Distinguishing objective from subjective assessments of the severity of medication-related safety events among people with Parkinson's disease: A qualitative study

Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 436-440

  Buetow, S ^a   Henshaw, J ^a   Cha, R ^a   O'Sullivan, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b Parkinson's New Zealand   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

medication errors; Parkinson's disease; patient acceptance of health care; qualitative research; safety

Indexed keywords

PERGOLIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG MEGADOSE; DRUG SAFETY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICATION ERROR; NEW ZEALAND; OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; PARKINSON DISEASE; PATIENT SAFETY; PRESCRIPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELF REPORT; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; TELEPHONE;

AGED; ANTIPARKINSON AGENTS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMMUNICATION; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICATION ERRORS; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; PARKINSON DISEASE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84863482674     PISSN: 02694727     EISSN: 13652710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2011.01316.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Burgender J,. Parkinson-Syndrom: iatrogene Ursachen, iatrogene Behandlungsfolgen. J Suisse Med, 1996; 126, 522-527.
2. Khadem N, Nirenberg M,. Carbidopa/Levodopa pharmacy errors in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord, 2010; 25, 2867-2870.
3. Buetow S, Bryant L, O'Sullivan D, Henshaw J,. Medication timing errors for Parkinson's disease in New Zealand: perceptions of caregivers and people with Parkinson's. Parkinson's Disease, 2010: 6 pages, Article ID 432983. doi:.
4. Vincent C, Coulter A,. Patient safety: what about the patient? Qual Saf Health Care, 2002; 11, 76-80. (Pubitemid 35265307)
5. Findley L, Baker M,. Treating neurodegenerative diseases. What patients want is not what doctors focus on. BMJ, 2002; 324, 1466-1467.
6. Burroughs T, Waterman A, Gallagher T, et al. Patients' concerns about medical errors during hospitalization. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2007; 33, 5-14.
7. Elwyn G, Buetow S, Hibbard J, Wensing M,. Respecting the subjective: quality measurement from the patient's perspective. BMJ, 2007; 335, 1021-1022. (Pubitemid 350157259)
8. Janca A,. A report on the WHO working group on Parkinson's disease. Neuroepidemiology, 1999; 18, 236-240. (Pubitemid 29399845)
9. Howe A,. Ally, advocate, authority: strengthening the patient voice in medical education. Clinical Teacher, 2007; 4, 170-174. (Pubitemid 47308263)
10. World Health Organization. World alliance for patient safety: forward programme 2008-2009. Geneva: WHO, 2008.
11. Anonymous. (2008) People with Parkinson's sought for research study. The Parkinsonian, (June), 3.
12. Buxton V,. How you can help people with Parkinson's get it on time. Br J Neurosci Nurs, 2007; 3, 140-144.
13. Thomas D,. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Evalu, 2006; 27, 1-10.
14. Williams S, Ashcroft D,. Medication errors: how reliable are the severity ratings reported to the national reporting and learning system? Int J Qual Health Care, 2009; 21, 316-320.
15. Dean B, Barber N,. A validated, reliable method of scoring the severity of medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 1999; 56, 57-62. (Pubitemid 29036344)
16. Albrecht G,. Using subjective health assessments in practice and policy-making. Health Care Anal, 1996; 4, 284-292. (Pubitemid 26411806)
17. Buetow S, Mintoft B,. When should patient intuition be taken seriously? J Gen Intern Med, 2011; 26, 433-436.
18. Fitzpatrick R, Hinton J, Newman S, Scambler G, Thompson J,. The social experience of illness. London: Tavistock Publications, 1984.
19. Koretz R,. Hepatitis C - the case against treatment. Eur J Surg, 2001; 167, S8, 34-39. (Pubitemid 32977802)
20. Rane L, Fekadua A, Wooderson S, Poonb L, Markopouloua K, Clearea A,. Discrepancy between subjective and objective severity in treatment-resistant depression: prediction of treatment outcome. J Psychiatr Res, 2010; 44, 1082-1087.
21. Yang H, Jeon Y, Pyun B,. Evaluation of patient's subjective severity using various scoring system in Korean children with atopic dermatitis. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol, 2010; 28, 130-135.
22. O'Donoghue G, Fox N, Heneghan C, Hurley D,. Objective and subjective assessment of sleep in chronic low back pain patients compared with healthy age and gender matched controls: a pilot study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord, 2009; 10, 122. doi:.
23. Holinagel H, Malterud K,. Shifting attention from objective risk factors to patients' self-assessed health resources: a clinical model for general practice. Fam Pract, 1995; 12, 423-429. (Pubitemid 26019891)
24. Boudon R,. Beyond rational choice theory. Ann Rev Sociol, 2003; 29, 1-21. (Pubitemid 37395363)
25. White C, Woodfield K, Ritchie J,. Reporting and presenting qualitative data. In:, Ritchie J, Lewis J, eds. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage, 287-320, 2003.
26. Buetow S, Elwyn G,. The window mirror: a new model of the patient-physician relationship. Open Medicine, 2008; 2, 1. E20-25
27. Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D,. The meaning of patient satisfaction: An explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med, 1988; 47, 1351-1359.
28. Buetow S, Elwyn G,. Patients and errors: a dangerous combination. Lancet, 2007; 369, 158-161.
29. Buetow S, Kiata-Holland L, Liew T, Kenealy T, Dovey S, Elwyn G,. Patient error: a preliminary taxonomy. Ann Fam Med, 2009; 7, 223-231.
30. Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M,. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
31. Morse JM,. What's wrong with random selection? Qual Health Res, 1998; 8, 733-735.
32. Damiano A, McGrath M, Willian M, Snyder C, LeWitt P, Reyes P, Richter RR, Means ED,. Evaluation of a measurement strategy for Parkinson's disease: assessing patient health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res, 2000; 9, 87-100. (Pubitemid 30670652)
33. National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Parkinson's disease. National clinical guideline for diagnosis and management in primary and secondary care. London, UK: Royal College of Physicians, 2006.
34. Department of Health. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. London, UK: Department of Health, 2001.
35. Ogden J, Bavalia K, Bull M, et al. "I want more time with my doctor": a quantitative study of time and the consultation. Fam Pract, 2004; 21, 470-483.