SWATgrid: An interface for setting up SWAT in a grid-based discretization scheme

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 45, Issue , 2012, Pages 161-167

  Rathjens, H ^a   Oppelt, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Discretization scheme; Grid cell; Hydrological modeling; Model development; SWAT

Indexed keywords

DISCRETIZATION SCHEME; GRID CELLS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; SWAT;

REMOTE SENSING; WATERSHEDS;

INPUT OUTPUT PROGRAMS;

DATA SET; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WATERSHED;

EID: 84863470084     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arabi M., Govindaraju R.S., Hantush M.M., Engel B.A. Role of watershed subdivision on modeling the effectiveness of best management practices with SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2006, 42:513-528.
2. Arnold J., Allen P., Volk M., Williams J., Bosch D. Assessment of different representations of spatial variability on SWAT model performance. Transactions of the ASABE 2010, 53:1433-1443.
3. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Engel B.A. Flexible watershed configurations for simulation models. Hydrological Science and Technology 1994, 10:1-9.
4. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., Williams J.R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1998, 34:73-89.
5. Chaubey I., Cotter A.S., Costello T.A., Soerens T.S. Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty. Hydrological Processes 2005, 19:621-628.
6. Chen E., Mackay D.S. Effects of distribution-based parameter aggregation on a spatially distributed agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 295:211-224. (Beschreibt Schwierigkeit des HRU-Konzepts bei der Implementierung von MUSLE).
7. Cho J., Lowrance R.R., Bosch D.D., Strickland T.C., Her Y., Vellidis G. Effect of watershed subdivision and filter width on SWAT simulation of a coastal plain watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2010, 46:586-602.
8. Dixon B., Earls J. Resample or not?! Effects of resolution of DEMs in watershed modeling. Hydrological Processes 2009, 23:1714-1724.
9. Douglas D.H. Experiments to locate ridges and channels to create a new type of digital elevation model. Cartographica 1986, 23:29-61.
10. Fairfield J., Leymarie P. Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 1991, 27:709-717.
11. FitzHugh T.W., Mackay D.S. Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. Journal of Hydrology 2000, 236:35-53.
12. Garbrecht, J., Martz, L., 2000. TOPAZ User Manual: Version 3.1, Technical Report. Grazinglands Research Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, El Reno, Oklahoma.
13. Gassman P.W., Reyes M.R., Green C.H., Arnold J.G. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transactions of the ASABE 2007, 50:1211-1250.
14. Haverkamp S., Fohrer N., Frede H.G. Assessment of the effect of land use patterns on hydrologic landscape functions: a comprehensive GIS-based tool to minimize model uncertainty resulting from spatial aggregation. Hydrological Processes 2005, 19:715-727.
15. Horton R.E. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin 1945, 56:275-370.
16. Immerzeel W., Droogers P. Calibration of a distributed hydrological model based on satellite evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology 2008, 349:411-424.
17. Jha M., Gassman P., Secchi S., Gu R., Arnold J. Effect of watershed subdivision on swat flow, sediment, and nutrient predictions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2004, 40:811-825. Katrin.
18. Krysanova V., Arnold J.G. Advances in ecohydrological modelling with swat-a review. Hydrological Sciences Journal 2008, 53:939-947.
19. Manguerra H.B., Engel B.A. Hydrologic parameterization of watersheds for runoff prediction using SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1998, 34:1149-1162.
20. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J.R., 2010. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input/Output File Documentation: Version 2009, Technical Report 365. Texas Water Resources Institute, Temple, TX.
21. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R., 2005. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation: Version 2005. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station (Texas) and USDA Agricultural Research Service (Texas), Temple, TX.
22. Ouyang W., Skidmore A.K., Toxopeus A., Hao F. Long-term vegetation landscape pattern with non-point source nutrient pollution in upper stream of yellow river basin. Journal of Hydrology 2010, 389:373-380.
23. Pandey V., Panda S.N., Sudhakar S. Modelling of an agricultural watershed using remote sensing and a geographic information system. Biosystems Engineering 2005, 90:331-347.
24. Quansah J.E., Engel B.A., Chaubey I. Tillage practices usage in early warning prediction of atrazine pollution. Transactions of the ASABE 2008, 51:1311-1321.
25. Strahler A.N. Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geological Society of America Bulletin 1952, 63:1117-1142.
26. White M., Storm D., Busteed P., Stoodley S., Phillips S. Evaluating nonpoint-source critical source area contributions at the watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Quality 2009, 38:1654-1663.
27. White M., Storm D., Busteed P., Stoodley S., Phillips S. Evaluating conservation program success with Landsat and SWAT. Environmental Management 2010, 45:1164-1174.
28. Winchell, M., Srinivasan, R., Di Luzio, M., Arnold, J.G., 2010. ArcSWAT Interface For SWAT 2009: User's Guide. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station (Texas) and USDA Agricultural Research Service (Texas). Temple, TX.
29. Xie X., Zhang D. Data assimilation for distributed hydrological catchment modeling via ensemble Kalman filter. Advances in Water Resources 2010, 33:678-690.
30. Xue B., Keming M., Liu Y., Jieyu Z., Xiaolei Z. Differences of ecological functions inside and outside the wetland nature reserves in Sanjiang plain, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2008, 28:620-626.
31. Yan, E., Milewski, A., Sultan, M., Abdeldayerm, A., Soliman, F., Gelil, K.A., 2010. Remote sensing based approach to improve regional estimation of renewable water resources for sustainable development. In: US-Egypt Workshop on Space Technology and Geoinformation for Sustainable Development, Cairo, Egypt.