Varying effects of connectivity and dispersal on interacting species dynamics

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 242, Issue , 2012, Pages 81-91

  Salau, Kehinde ^a   Schoon, Michael L ^a   Baggio, Jacopo A ^a   Janssen, Marco A ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent based model; Density dependent dispersal; Habitat connectivity; Landscape fragmentation; Metapopulation; Predator prey

Indexed keywords

AGENT-BASED MODEL; DENSITY-DEPENDENT; HABITAT CONNECTIVITY; LANDSCAPE FRAGMENTATION; METAPOPULATIONS; PREDATOR-PREY;

BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS;

DYNAMICS;

BIODIVERSITY; COEXISTENCE; DECISION MAKING; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; DEVELOPING WORLD; DISPERSAL; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; LANDSCAPE; METAPOPULATION; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; PROTECTED AREA; RISK FACTOR; TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 84863428607     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.04.028     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Amarasekare P. The role of density-dependent dispersal in source-sink dynamics. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2004, 226:159-168.
2. Bach L.A., Thomsen R., Pertoldi C., Loeschke V. Kin competition and the evolution of dispersal in an individual-based model. Ecological Modelling 2006, 192:658-666.
3. Baggio J.A., Salau K., Janssen M.A., Schoon M.L., Bodin ö Landscape connectivity and predator-prey population dynamics. Landscape Ecology 2011, 26:33-45.
4. Bartumeus F., Levin S.A. Fractal reorientation clocks:linking animal behavior to statistical patterns of search. PNAS 2008, 105:19072-19077.
5. Beier P., Noss R.F. Do habitat corridors provide connectivity. Conservation Biology 1998, 12:1241-1252.
6. Bodin Ö., Norberg J. A network approach for analyzing spatially structured populations in fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecologyl 2007, 22:31-44.
7. Boitani L., Falcucci A., Maiorano L., Rondinini C. Ecological networks as conceptual frameworks or operational tools in conservation. Conservation Biology 2007, 21:1414-1422.
8. Bonabeau E. Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2002, 99:7280-7287.
9. Brockington D., Duffy R., Igoe J. Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism and the Future of Protected Areas 2008, Earthscan, London.
10. Brown K. Innovation for conservation and development. Geographical Journal 2002, 168:6-17.
11. Creel S., Winnie J., Maxwell B., Hamlin K., Creel M. Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves. Ecology 2005, 86:3387-3397.
12. Child B. Parks in Transition: Biodiversity, Rural Development, and the Bottom Line 2004, Earthscan, London.
13. Cuddington K.M., Yodzis P. Diffusion-limited predator-prey dynamics in Euclidean environments: an allometric individual-based model. Theoretical Population Biology 2000, 58:259-278.
14. Droz M., Pekalski A. Coexistence in a predator-prey system. Physical Review A 2001, 63(051909):51901-51906.
15. Fischhoff I.R., Sundaresan S.R., Cordingley J., Rubenstein D.I. Habitat use and movements of plains zebra (Equus burchelli) in response to predation danger from lions. Behavioral Ecology 2007, 18:725-729.
16. Focardi S., et al. Do ungulates exhibit a food density threshold? A field study of optimal foraging and movement patterns. Journal of Animal Ecology 1996, 65:606-620.
17. Giske J., Mangel M., Jakobsen P., Huse G., Wilcox C., Strand E. Explicit trade-off rules in proximate adaptive agents. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2003, 5:835-865.
18. Gotelli N.J. A Primer of Ecology 2008, Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
19. Hilty J.A., Lidicker W.Z., Merenlender A.M. Corridor Ecology: The Science and Practice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation 2006, Island Press, Washington, DC.
20. Holland M.D., Hastings A. Strong effect of dispersal network structure on ecological dynamics. Nature 2008, 456:792-795.
21. Holling C.S. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Canadian Entomologist 1959, 91:293-320.
22. Hovestadt T., Kubisch A., Poethke H.J. Information processing in models for density-dependent emigration: a comparison. Ecological Modelling 2010, 221:405-410.
23. Hudgens B.R., Haddad N.M. Predicting which species will benefit from corridors in fragmented landscapes from population growth models. American Naturalist 2003, 161:808-820.
24. Ioannou C.C., Ruxton G.D., Krause J. Search rate, attack probability, and the relationship between prey density and prey encounter rate. Behavioral Ecology 2008, 19:842-846.
25. Ives A.R., Dobson A.P. Antipredator behavior and the population dynamics of simple predator-prey systems. American Naturalist 1987, 130:431-447.
26. Kun A., Scheuring I. The evolution of density-dependent dispersal in a noisy spatial population model. Oikos 2006, 115:308-320.
27. Lima S.L. Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2002, 17:70-75.
28. Linhares A. Synthesizing a predatory search strategy for VLSI layouts. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 1999, 3:147-152.
29. Lotka A.J. Element of Physical Biology 1925, Willimas & Wilkins, Baltimore, Reissued as Elements of Mathematical Biology, Dover, New York, 1956.
30. Luttberg B., Schmitz O.J. Predator and prey models with flexible individual behavior and imperfect information. American Naturalist 2000, 155:669-683.
31. McLane A.J., Semeniuk C., McDermid G.J., Marceau D.J. The role of agent-based models in wildlife ecology and management. Ecological Modelling 2011, 222:1544-1556.
32. Metz J.A.J., Gyllenberg M. How should we define fitness in structured metapopulation models? Including an application to the calculation of evolutionary stable dispersal strategies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 2001, 268:499-508.
33. Meyer W.B., Turner II B.L. Human population growth and global land-use/cover change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1992, 23:39-61.
34. Minor E.S., Urban D.L. Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. Ecological Applications 2007, 17:1771-1782.
35. Nelson E.H., Matthews C.E., Rosenheim J.A. Predators reduce prey population growth by inducing changes in prey behavior. Ecology 2004, 85:1853-1858.
36. Nonaka E., Holme P. Agent-based model approach to optimal foraging in heterogeneous landscapes: effects of patch clumpiness. Ecography 2007, 30:777-788.
37. Pyke G.H. Optimal foraging in hummingbirds: rule of movement between inflorescences. Animal Behaviour 1981, 29:889-896.
38. Railsback S.F. Concepts from complex adaptive systems as a framework for individual-based modeling. Ecological Modelling 2001, 139:47-62.
39. Ruxton G.D., Gonzalez-Andujar J.L., Perry J.N. Mortality during dispersal and the stability of a metapopulation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1997, 186:389-396.
40. Ruxton G.D., Rohani P. Fitness-dependent dispersal in metapopulations and its consequences for persistence and synchrony. Journal of Animal Ecology 1998, 68:530-539.
41. Sanchirico J., Wilen J. Bioeconomics of spatial exploitation in a patchy environment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1999, 37:129-150.
42. Sanchirico J.N., Wilen J.E. A bioeconomic model of marine reserve creation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2001, 42:257-276.
43. Sanchirico J., Wilen J. Optimal spatial management of renewable resources: matching policy scope to ecosystem scale. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2005, 50:23-46.
44. Schoon, M.L., 2008. Building robustness to disturbance: Governance in Southern African peace parks. Dissertation 2008. Indiana University.
45. Silva J.A.L., De Castro M.L., Justo D.A.R. Stability in a metapopulation model with density-dependent dispersal. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 2001, 63:485-506.
46. Soulé M.E., Terborgh J. Protecting nature at regional and continental scales: a conservation biology program for the new millennium. Bioscience 1999, 49:809-817.
47. Tang W., Bennett D.A. Agent-based modeling of animal movement: a review. Geography Compass 2010, 4:682-700.
48. Travis J.M.J., Murrell D.J., Dytham C. The evolution of density-dependent dispersal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 1999, 266:1837-1842.
49. Urban D.L., Keitt T. Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 2001, 82:1205-1218.
50. van Aarde R.J., Jackson T.P. Megaparks for metapopulations: addressing the causes of locally high elephant numbers in southern Africa. Biological Conservation 2007, 134:289-297.
51. Volterra V. Variazioni e fluttuazioni d'individui in specie animal. conventi. Mem. Acad. Lincei. 1926, 2:31-113. Translated as an appendix to Chapman, R.N., Animal Ecology, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1931.
52. Volterra V. Leçcons sur la Thóeorie Mathóematique de la Lutte popur la Vie 1931, Gauthier Villare, Paris.
53. Walters C. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources 1986, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
54. Wiens J.A., et al. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 1993, 66:369-380.
55. Wiens J.A. Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. Metapopulation Biology, Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution 1997, 43-62. Academic Press, New York. I.A. Hanski, M. Gilpin (Eds.).
56. Wilson W.G. Resolving discrepancies between deterministic population models and individual-based simulations. American Naturalist 1998, 151:116-134.