Creation of a new domain and evaluation of comparison generation in a natural language generation system

INLG 2008 - 5th International Natural Language Generation Conference, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 169-172

  Marge, Matthew ^a   Isard, Amy ^b   Moore, Johanna ^b  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENERATION ALGORITHM; NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION SYSTEMS; PARAMETERIZED;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84863411648     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1708322.1708354     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. I. Androutsopoulos, J. Oberlander, and V. Karkaletsis. 2007. Source authoring for multilingual generation of personalised object descriptions. Natural Language Engineering, 13:191-233.
2. R. Cox, M. O'Donnell, and J. Oberlander. 1999. Dynamic versus static hypermedia in museum education: an evaluation of ILEX, the intelligent labelling explorer. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Education conference, Le Mans.
3. R. Dale, J. Green, M. Milosavljevic, C. Paris, C. Verspoor, and S. Williams. 1998. The realities of generating natural language from databases. In Proceedings of the 11th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Brisbane, Australia.
4. D. Galanis and I. Androutsopoulos. 2007. Generating multilingual descriptions from linguistically annotated OWL ontologies: the NaturalOWL system. In Proceedings of ENLG 2007.
5. A. Isard, J. Oberlander, I. Androutsopoulos, and C. Matheson. 2003. Speaking the users' languages. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 18(1):40-45. Special Issue on Advances in Natural Language Processing.
6. A. Isard. 2007. Choosing the best comparison under the circumstances. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Personalization Enhanced Access to Cultural Heritage, Corfu, Greece.
7. A. Karasimos and A. Isard. 2004. Multi-lingual evaluation of a natural language generation system. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal.
8. R. Likert. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140):1-55.
9. M. Marge. 2007. An evaluation of comparison generation in the methodius natural language generation system. Master's thesis, University of Edinburgh.
10. K. McKeown. 1985. Text Generation: Using Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to Generate Natural Language Text. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
11. M. Milosavljevic. 1997. Content selection in comparison generation. In 6th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation), Duisburg, Germany.
12. M. O'Donnell, C. Mellish, J. Oberlander, and A. Knott. 2001. ILEX: An architecture for a dynamic hypertext generation system. Natural Language Engineering, 7:225-250.
13. M. White. 2006. Efficient realization of coordinate structures in combinatory categorial grammar. Research on Language and Computation, 4(1):39-75. (Pubitemid 43830209)