Consensus recommendations of the German Radiology Society (DRG), the German Cardiac Society (DGK) and the German Society for Pediatric Cardiology (DGPK) on the Use of Cardiac Imaging with Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging;Konsensusempfehlungen der DRG/DGK/DGPK zum Einsatz der Herzbildgebung mit Computertomografie und Magnetresonanztomografie

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 184, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 345-368

  Achenbach, S ^b   Barkhausen, J ^a   Beer, M ^a   Beerbaum, P ^b   Dill, T ^b   Eichhorn, J ^b   Fratz, S ^b   Gutberlet, M ^a   Hoffmann, M ^a   Huber, A ^b   Hunold, P ^a   Klein, C ^b   Krombach, G ^a   Kreitner, K F ^a   Kuhne T ^b   Lotz, J ^a   Maintz, D ^a   Marholdt, H ^b   Merkle, N ^b   Messroghli, D ^b   Miller, S ^a   Paetsch, I ^b   Radke, P ^b   Steen, H ^b   Thiele, H ^b   Sarikouch, S ^b   Fischbach, R ^a   more..

^a ASKLEPIOS KLINIK ALTONA   (Germany)

^b Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie Herz und Kreislaufforschung ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOMYOPATHY; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONGENITAL HEART MALFORMATION; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERICARDIAL DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

ADULT; CARDIAC IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CHILD; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; GERMANY; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; INFANT; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84863404990     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299400     Document Type: Article

References (395)

1. Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med: 2008; 358 1336 1345 (Pubitemid 351468410)
2. Arad Y, Goodman KJ, Roth M et al. Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: the St. Francis Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2005; 46 158 165 (Pubitemid 40905145)
3. Park R, Detrano R, Xiang M et al. Combined use of computed tomography coronary calcium scores and C-reactive protein levels in predicting cardiovascular events in nondiabetic individuals. Circulation: 2002; 106 2073 2077 (Pubitemid 35192813)
4. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP et al. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. Jama: 2004; 291 210 215 (Pubitemid 38082815)
5. Taylor AJ, Bindeman J, Feuerstein I et al. Coronary calcium independently predicts incident premature coronary heart disease over measured cardiovascular risk factors: mean three-year outcomes in the Prospective Army Coronary Calcium (PACC) project. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2005; 46 807 814 (Pubitemid 41224803)
6. Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2010; 56 2182 2199
7. Erbel R, Möhlenkamp S, Moebus S et al. Coronary risk stratification, discrimination, and reclassification improvement based on quantification of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2010; 56 1397 1406
8. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2008; 52 2135 2144
9. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2008; 52 1724 1732
10. Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS et al. 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart: 2008; 94 1386 1393
11. Scheffel H, Leschka S, Plass A et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for the preoperative detection of coronary artery disease in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol: 2007; 100 701 776
12. Catalan P, Leta R, Hidalgo A et al. Ruling out coronary artery disease with noninvasive coronary multidetector CT angiography before noncoronary cardiovascular surgery. Radiology: 2011; 258 426 434
13. Poldermans D, Bax JJ, Boersma E et al. Guidelines for pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery: the Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur Heart J: 2009; 30 2769 2812
14. Rerkpattanapipat P, Morgan TM, Neagle CM et al. Assessment of preoperative cardiac risk with magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol: 2002; 90 416 419
15. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests. Adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation: 2007; 115 1769 1776 (Pubitemid 46648614)
16. Bernhardt P, Engels T, Levenson B et al. Prediction of necessity for coronary artery revascularization by adenosine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiol: 2006; 112 184 190 (Pubitemid 44353795)
17. Costa MA, Shoemaker S, Futamatsu H et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2007; 50 514 522 (Pubitemid 47126780)
18. Gebker R, Jahnke C, Manka R et al. Additional value of myocardial perfusion imaging during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging: 2008; 1 122 130
19. Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation: 2004; 110 835 842 (Pubitemid 39096012)
20. Schwitter J, Wacker C, van Rossum A et al. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. European Heart Journal: 2008; 29 480 489 (Pubitemid 351264187)
21. Bodi V, Sanchis J, Lopez-Lereu MP et al. Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2007; 50 1174 1179 (Pubitemid 47375015)
22. Korosoglou G, Elhmidi Y, Steen H et al. Prognostic value of high-dose dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging in 1,493 consecutive patients: Assessment of myocardial wall motion and perfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2010; 56 1225 1234
23. Bodi V, Husser O, Sanchis J et al. Prognostic implications of dipyridamole cardiac MR imaging: a prospective multicenter registry. Radiology: 2012; 262 91 100
24. Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet: 2011; 379 453 460
25. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CA, Mollet NR et al. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2007; 50 1469 1475 (Pubitemid 47496246)
26. Hadamitzky M, Freissmuth B, Meyer T et al. Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 404 411
27. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Berman DS et al. Costs and clinical outcomes in individuals without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography from an analysis of Medicare category III transaction codes. Am J Cardiol: 2008; 102 672 678
28. Ostrom MP, Gopal A, Ahmadi N et al. Mortality incidence and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2008; 52 1335 1343
29. Gopal A, Nasir K, Ahmadi N et al. Cardiac computed tomographic angiography in an outpatient setting: an analysis of clinical outcomes over a 40-month period. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr: 2009; 3 90 95
30. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Hendel RC et al. Prognosis by coronary computed tomographic angiography: matched comparison with myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr: 2008; 2 93 101
31. van Werkhoven JM, Gaemperli O, Schuijf JD et al. Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for risk stratification in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood. Heart: 2009; 95 1607 1611
32. Shuman WP, May JM, Branch KR et al. Negative ECG-gated cardiac CT in patients with low-to-moderate risk chest pain in the emergency department: 1-year follow-up. American journal of roentgenology: 2010; 195 923 927
33. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2010; 56 1864 1894
34. Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF et al. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2007; 50 1343 1353 (Pubitemid 47449733)
35. Hines JL, Danciu SC, Shah M et al. Use of multidetector computed tomography after mildly abnormal myocardial perfusion stress testing in a large single-specialty cardiology practice. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr: 2008; 2 372 378
36. Danciu SC, Herrera CJ, Stecy PJ et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to identify patients with abnormal myocardial perfusion stress in whom diagnostic catheterization may be safely avoided. Am J Cardiol: 2007; 100 1605 1608 (Pubitemid 350122324)
37. Abidov A, Gallagher MJ, Chinnaiyan KM et al. Clinical effectiveness of coronary computed tomographic angiography in the triage of patients to cardiac catheterization and revascularization after inconclusive stress testing: results of a 2-year prospective trial. J Nucl Cardiol: 2009; 16 701 713
38. Cury RC, Shash K, Nagurney JT et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance with T2-weighted imaging improves detection of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Circulation: 2008; 118 837 844
39. Hombach V, Merkle N, Kestler HA et al. Characterization of patients with acute chest pain using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Res Cardiol: 2008; 97 760 767
40. Lockie T, Nagel E, Redwood S et al. Use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation: 2009; 119 1671 1681
41. Hollander JE, Chang AM, Shofer FS et al. One-year outcomes following coronary computerized tomographic angiography for evaluation of emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome. Acad Emerg Med: 2009; 16 693 698
42. Hollander JE, Chang AM, Shofer FS et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography for rapid discharge of low-risk patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med: 2009; 53 295 304
43. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW et al. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2007; 49 863 871 (Pubitemid 46275355)
44. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F et al. Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation: 2006; 114 2251 2260 (Pubitemid 44801488)
45. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T et al. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation: 2007; 115 1762 1768 (Pubitemid 46648613)
46. Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae CU et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2009; 53 1642 1650
47. Chang SA, Choi SI, Choi EK et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography as an initial diagnostic approach in patients with acute chest pain. Am Heart J: 2008; 156 375 383
48. Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A et al. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2011; 58 1414 1422
49. Eitel I, Behrendt F, Schindler K et al. Differential diagnosis of the apical ballooning syndrome using contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J: 2008; 29 2651 2659
50. Eitel I, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Bernhardt P et al. Clinical characteristics and cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in stress (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy: A multicenter series in Europe and North America. JAMA: 2011; 306 277 286
51. Assomull RG, Lyne JC, Keenan N et al. The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients presenting with chest pain, raised troponin, and unobstructed coronary arteries. Eur Heart J: 2007; 28 1242 1249 (Pubitemid 47343853)
52. Baccouche H, Mahrholdt H, Meinhardt G et al. Diagnostic synergy of non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive endomyocardial biopsy in troponin-positive patients without coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J: 2009; 30 2869 2879
53. Laissy JP, Hyafil F, Feldman LJ et al. Differentiating acute myocardial infarction from myocarditis: diagnostic value of early- and delayed-perfusion cardiac MR imaging. Radiology: 2005; 237 75 82 (Pubitemid 41346148)
54. Mewton N, Bonnefoy E, Revel D et al. Presence and extent of cardiac magnetic resonance microvascular obstruction in reperfused non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction and correlation with infarct size and myocardial enzyme release. Cardiology: 2009; 113 50 58
55. Raman SV, Simonetti OP, Winner MW III et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance with edema imaging identifies myocardium at risk and predicts worse outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2010; 55 2480 2488
56. Beek AM, Kuhl HP, Bondarenko O et al. Delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of regional functional improvement after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2003; 42 895 901 (Pubitemid 37059750)
57. Bruder O, Breuckmann F, Jensen C et al. Prognostic impact of contrast-enhanced CMR early after acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a regional STEMI network: results of the Herzinfarktverbund Essen" Herz: 2008; 33 136 142 (Pubitemid 351437851)
58. Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA et al. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting improvement of regional myocardial function in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation: 2002; 106 1083 1089 (Pubitemid 34970848)
59. Hombach V, Grebe O, Merkle N et al. Sequelae of acute myocardial infarction regarding cardiac structure and function and their prognostic significance as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J: 2005; 26 549 557 (Pubitemid 40461096)
60. Nijveldt R, Beek AM, Hofman MB et al. Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of infarct size and microvascular obstruction in optimally treated patients after acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2007; 9 765 770 (Pubitemid 47463905)
61. Shapiro MD, Nieman K, Nasir K et al. Utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to predict left ventricular recovery after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol: 2007; 100 211 216 (Pubitemid 47041979)
62. Wu E, Ortiz JT, Tejedor P et al. Infarct size by contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is a stronger predictor of outcomes than left ventricular ejection fraction or end-systolic volume index: prospective cohort study. Heart: 2008; 94 730 736 (Pubitemid 351744690)
63. Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation: 1998; 97 765 772 (Pubitemid 28135339)
64. de Waha S, Desch S, Eitel I et al. Impact of early vs. late microvascular obstruction assessed by magnetic resonance imaging on long-term outcome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison with traditional prognostic markers. Eur Heart J: 2010; 31 2660 2668
65. Eitel I, Desch S, Fuernau G et al. Prognostic significance and determinants of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2010; 55 2470 2479
66. Eitel I, Behrendt F, Schindler K et al. Differential diagnosis of suspected apical ballooning syndrome using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J: 2008; 29 2651 2659
67. Nienaber CA, Kische S, Skriabina V et al. Noninvasive imaging approaches to evaluate the patient with known or suspected aortic disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 499 506
68. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Apfel CC et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med: 2006; 166 1350 1356 (Pubitemid 44036346)
69. Erbel R, Alfonso F, Boileau C et al. Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection. Eur Heart J: 2001; 22 1642 1681
70. Mammen L, Yucel E, Khan A et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria acute chest pain - suspected aortic dissection. Reston (VA) American College of Radiology (ACR) online publication: 2008; 1 6
71. Haage P, Piroth W, Krombach G et al. Pulmonary embolism: comparison of angiography with spiral computed tomography, magnetic resonance angiography, and real-time magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Respir Crit Care Med: 2003; 167 729 734 (Pubitemid 36801750)
72. Kluge A, Luboldt W, Bachmann G. Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT. Am J Roentgenol: 2006; 187 W7 W14
73. Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR et al. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology: 2007; 245 315 329 (Pubitemid 47612510)
74. Stein PD, Woodard PK, Weg JG et al. Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II investigators. Am J Med: 2006; 119 1048 1055 (Pubitemid 44826939)
75. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation: 2007; 115 1769 1776 (Pubitemid 46648614)
76. Wallace EL, Morgan TM, Walsh TF et al. Dobutamine cardiac magnetic resonance results predict cardiac prognosis in women with known or suspected ischemic heart disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 299 307
77. Bodi V, Sanchis J, Lopez-Lereu MP et al. Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2007; 50 1174 1179 (Pubitemid 47375015)
78. Bodi V, Sanchis J, Lopez-Lereu MP et al. Prognostic and therapeutic implications of dipyridamole stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance on the basis of the ischaemic cascade. Heart: 2009; 95 49 55
79. Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R et al. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. Eur Heart J: 2004; 25 1657 1665 (Pubitemid 39209287)
80. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med: 2009; 360 213 224
81. Watkins S, McGeoch R, Lyne J et al. Validation of magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary heart disease. Circulation: 2009; 120 2207 2213
82. Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation: 2004; 110 732 737 (Pubitemid 39056274)
83. Kaandorp TA, Bax JJ, Schuijf JD et al. Head-to-head comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging in men with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol: 2004; 93 1461 1464 (Pubitemid 38749199)
84. Wellnhofer E, Olariu A, Klein C et al. Magnetic resonance low-dose dobutamine test is superior to SCAR quantification for the prediction of functional recovery. Circulation: 2004; 109 2172 2174 (Pubitemid 38625392)
85. Baer FM, Voth E, Deutsch HJ et al. Predictive value of low dose dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for recovery of regional left ventricular function after successful revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol: 1996; 28 60 69 (Pubitemid 26266623)
86. Baer FM, Voth E, Schneider CA et al. Comparison of low-dose dobutamine-gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. A functional and morphological approach to the detection of residual myocardial viability. Circulation: 1995; 91 1006 1015
87. Gutberlet M, Frohlich M, Mehl S et al. Myocardial viability assessment in patients with highly impaired left ventricular function: comparison of delayed enhancement, dobutamine stress MRI, end-diastolic wall thickness, and TI201-SPECT with functional recovery after revascularization. Eur Radiol: 2005; 15 872 880 (Pubitemid 41166718)
88. Hunold P, Kreitner KF, Barkhausen J. [Dead or alive?": how and why myocardial viability imaging by cardiac MRI works]. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2007; 179 1016 1024 (Pubitemid 47596613)
89. Sandstede JJ, Bertsch G, Beer M et al. Detection of myocardial viability by low-dose dobutamine Cine MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging: 1999; 17 1437 1443
90. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med: 2000; 343 1445 1453
91. Klein C, Nagel E, Gebker R et al. Magnetic resonance adenosine perfusion imaging in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 437 445
92. Kuhl HP, Beek AM, van der Weerdt AP et al. Myocardial viability in chronic ischemic heart disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2003; 41 1341 1348 (Pubitemid 36442708)
93. Soon KH, Cox N, Wong A et al. CT coronary angiography predicts the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion. J Interv Cardiol: 2007; 20 359 366 (Pubitemid 47429139)
94. Mollet NR, Hoye A, Lemos PA et al. Value of preprocedure multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to predict the outcome of percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions. Am J Cardiol: 2005; 95 240 243 (Pubitemid 40092090)
95. Gasparovic H, Rybicki FJ, Millstine J et al. Three dimensional computed tomographic imaging in planning the surgical approach for redo cardiac surgery after coronary revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg: 2005; 28 244 249 (Pubitemid 41020691)
96. Aviram G, Sharony R, Kramer A et al. Modification of surgical planning based on cardiac multidetector computed tomography in reoperative heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg: 2005; 79 589 595 (Pubitemid 40186565)
97. Kamdar AR, Meadows TA, Roselli EE et al. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography in planning of reoperative cardiothoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg: 2008; 85 1239 1245 (Pubitemid 351381667)
98. Cho JR, Kim YJ, Ahn CM et al. Quantification of regional calcium burden in chronic total occlusion by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography and procedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol: 2010; 145 9 14
99. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M et al. Improvement of myocardial perfusion reserve early after coronary intervention: assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2000; 36 1557 1564
100. Fenchel M, Franow A, Stauder NI et al. Myocardial perfusion after angioplasty in patients suspected of having single-vessel coronary artery disease: improvement detected at rest-stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging - initial experience. Radiology: 2005; 237 67 74 (Pubitemid 41346147)
101. Hundley WG, Morgan TM, Neagle CM et al. Magnetic resonance imaging determination of cardiac prognosis. Circulation: 2002; 106 2328 2333 (Pubitemid 35244733)
102. Duerinckx AJ, Atkinson D, Hurwitz R. Assessment of coronary artery patency after stent placement using magnetic resonance angiography. Journal Of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: 1998; 8 896 902 (Pubitemid 28357598)
103. Hug J, Nagel E, Bornstedt A et al. Coronary arterial stents: Safety and artifacts during MR imaging. Radiology: 2000; 216 781 787 (Pubitemid 30660854)
104. Maintz D, Botnar RM, Fischbach R et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for assessment of the stent lumen: a phantom study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2002; 4 359 367 (Pubitemid 34983289)
105. Klem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ et al. Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2006; 47 1630 1638
106. Nagel E, Thouet T, Klein C et al. Noninvasive determination of coronary blood flow velocity with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after stent deployment. Circulation: 2003; 107 1738 1743 (Pubitemid 36418353)
107. Saito Y, Sakuma H, Shibata M et al. Assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve using fast velocity-encoded cine MRI for noninvasive detection of restenosis after coronary stent implantation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2001; 3 209 214 (Pubitemid 33062625)
108. Bernhardt P, Spiess J, Levenson B et al. Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass grafts: a multicenter study of an integrated cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 1292 1300
109. Cury RC, Cattani CA, Gabure LA et al. Diagnostic performance of stress perfusion and delayed-enhancement MR imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. Radiology: 2006; 240 39 45 (Pubitemid 43902593)
110. Doesch C, Seeger A, Hoevelborn T et al. Adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of ischemic heart disease. Clin Res Cardiol: 2008; 97 905 912
111. Pilz G, Bernhardt P, Klos M et al. Clinical implication of adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as potential gatekeeper prior to invasive examination in patients with AHA/ACC class II indication for coronary angiography. Clin Res Cardiol: 2006; 95 531 538 (Pubitemid 44496717)
112. Steel K, Broderick R, Gandla V et al. Complementary prognostic values of stress myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Circulation: 2009; 120 1390 1400
113. Heilmaier C, Bruder O, Meier F et al. Dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients after invasive coronary revascularization with stent placement. Acta Radiol: 2009; 50 1134 1141
114. Hundley WG, Hamilton CA, Thomas MS et al. Utility of fast cine magnetic resonance imaging and display for the detection of myocardial ischemia in patients not well suited for second harmonic stress echocardiography. Circulation: 1999; 100 1697 1702 (Pubitemid 29485251)
115. Korosoglou G, Lossnitzer D, Schellberg D et al. Strain-encoded cardiac MRI as an adjunct for dobutamine stress testing: incremental value to conventional wall motion analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 132 140
116. Kuijpers D, Ho KY, van Dijkman PR et al. Dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of myocardial ischemia with the use of myocardial tagging. Circulation: 2003; 107 1592 1597 (Pubitemid 36397326)
117. Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Ferrari VA et al. Determination of interobserver variability for identifying inducible left ventricular wall motion abnormalities during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J: 2006; 27 1459 1464 (Pubitemid 43998080)
118. Wahl A, Paetsch I, Roethemeyer S et al. High-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular MR imaging after coronary revascularization in patients with wall motion abnormalities at rest. Radiology: 2004; 233 210 216 (Pubitemid 39280976)
119. Dikkers R, Willems TP, de Jonge GJ et al. Accuracy of noninvasive coronary stenosis quantification of different commercially available dedicated software packages. J Comput Assist Tomogr: 2009; 33 505 512
120. Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, de Roos A et al. Detection of vein graft disease using high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography. Circulation: 2002; 105 328 333 (Pubitemid 34106181)
121. Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the noninvasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts and recipient coronary arteries. Circulation: 2003; 107 1502 1508 (Pubitemid 36378488)
122. Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW et al. Vein graft function improvement after percutaneous intervention: evaluation with MR flow mapping. Radiology: 2003; 228 834 841 (Pubitemid 37025496)
123. Salm LP, Bax JJ, Vliegen HW et al. Functional significance of stenoses in coronary artery bypass grafts. Evaluation by single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2004; 44 1877 1882 (Pubitemid 39424089)
124. Salm LP, Langerak SE, Vliegen HW et al. Blood flow in coronary artery bypass vein grafts: volume versus velocity at cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology: 2004; 232 915 920 (Pubitemid 39100282)
125. Salm LP, Vliegen HW, Langerak SE et al. Evaluation of saphenous vein coronary artery bypass graft flow by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2005; 7 631 637 (Pubitemid 41176828)
126. Stauder NI, Klumpp B, Stauder H et al. Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol: 2007; 80 975 983
127. Meyer TS, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M et al. Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient population. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2007; 49 946 950
128. Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Chihara R et al. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Am Heart J: 2007; 154 519 526 (Pubitemid 47271927)
129. Weustink AC, Nieman K, Pugliese F et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography in patients after bypass grafting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 816 824
130. Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation: 2006; 114 2334 2341; quiz (Pubitemid 44847450)
131. Nazeri I, Shahabi P, Tehrai M et al. Assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting using 64-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol: 2009; 103 667 673
132. Angelini P, Velasco JA, Flamm S. Coronary anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical relevance. Circulation: 2002; 105 2449 2454 (Pubitemid 34556400)
133. Vliegen HW, Doornbos J, de Roos A et al. Value of fast gradient echo magnetic resonance angiography as an adjunct to coronary arteriography in detecting and confirming the course of clinically significant coronary artery anomalies. Am J Cardiol: 1997; 79 773 776 (Pubitemid 27152335)
134. Post JC, van Rossum AC, Bronzwaer JG et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of anomalous coronary arteries. A new gold standard for delineating the proximal course? Circulation: 1995; 92 3163 3171
135. Taylor AM, Thorne SA, Rubens MB et al. Coronary artery imaging in grown up congenital heart disease: complementary role of magnetic resonance and x-ray coronary angiography. Circulation: 2000; 101 1670 1678 (Pubitemid 30196627)
136. Kacmaz F, Ozbulbul NI, Alyan O et al. Imaging of coronary artery anomalies: the role of multidetector computed tomography. Coron Artery Dis: 2008; 19 203 209 (Pubitemid 351555975)
137. Shi H, Aschoff AJ, Brambs HJ et al. Multislice CT imaging of anomalous coronary arteries. Eur Radiol: 2004; 14 2172 2181 (Pubitemid 40057927)
138. Duran C, Kantarci M, Durur Subasi I et al. Remarkable anatomic anomalies of coronary arteries and their clinical importance: a multidetector computed tomography angiographic study. J Comput Assist Tomogr: 2006; 30 939 948 (Pubitemid 44704420)
139. Schmid M, Achenbach S, Ludwig J et al. Visualization of coronary artery anomalies by contrast-enhanced multi-detector row spiral computed tomography. Int J Cardiol: 2006; 111 430 435 (Pubitemid 44205297)
140. Kim SY, Seo JB, Do KH et al. Coronary artery anomalies: classification and ECG-gated multi-detector row CT findings with angiographic correlation. Radiographics: 2006; 26 317 333; discussion 33-34 (Pubitemid 43515309)
141. Hachulla AL, Launay D, Gaxotte V et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional observational study of 52 patients. Ann Rheum Dis: 2009; 68 1878 1884
142. Ichinose A, Otani H, Oikawa M et al. MRI of cardiac sarcoidosis: basal and subepicardial localization of myocardial lesions and their effect on left ventricular function. Am J Roentgenol: 2008; 191 862 869
143. Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Hawkins PN et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and prognosis in cardiac amyloidosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2008; 10 54
144. Mavrogeni S, Manoussakis MN, Karagiorga TC et al. Detection of coronary artery lesions and myocardial necrosis by magnetic resonance in systemic necrotizing vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum: 2009; 61 1121 1129
145. Patel MR, Cawley PJ, Heitner JF et al. Detection of myocardial damage in patients with sarcoidosis. Circulation: 2009; 120 1969 1977
146. Pepe A, Positano V, Santarelli MF et al. Multislice multiecho T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of the heterogeneous distribution of myocardial iron overload. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2006; 23 662 668
147. Vogelsberg H, Mahrholdt H, Deluigi CC et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in clinically suspected cardiac amyloidosis: noninvasive imaging compared to endomyocardial biopsy. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2008; 51 1022 1030 (Pubitemid 351318125)
148. Thiele H, Nagel E, Paetsch I et al. Functional cardiac MR imaging with steady-state free precession (SSFP) significantly improves endocardial border delineation without contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2001; 14 362 367 (Pubitemid 32906553)
149. Thiele H, Paetsch I, Schnackenburg B et al. Improved accuracy of quantitative assessment of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by geometric models with steady-state free precession. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2002; 4 327 339 (Pubitemid 34983286)
150. Codreanu A, Djaballah W, Angioi M et al. Detection of myocarditis by contrast-enhanced MRI in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome but no coronary stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2007; 25 957 964 (Pubitemid 46697565)
151. O'Hanlon R, Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of hypertrophic and infiltrative cardiomyopathies. Heart Fail Clin: 2009; 5 369 387, vi
152. Shehata ML, Turkbey EB, Vogel-Claussen J et al. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Top Magn Reson Imaging: 2008; 19 43 57
153. Wu KC, Weiss RG, Thiemann DR et al. Late gadolinium enhancement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance heralds an adverse prognosis in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2008; 51 2414 2421 (Pubitemid 351826874)
154. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW et al. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function and volumes with 64-slice MSCT: a comparison with 2D echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol: 2006; 13 480 487 (Pubitemid 44204142)
155. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S et al. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology: 2005; 234 381 390 (Pubitemid 40139906)
156. Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol: 2003; 38 653 661 (Pubitemid 37140288)
157. Raman SV, Cook SC, McCarthy B et al. Usefulness of multidetector row computed tomography to quantify right ventricular size and function in adults with either tetralogy of Fallot or transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol: 2005; 95 683 686 (Pubitemid 40255271)
158. Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B et al. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J: 2006; 151 736 744 (Pubitemid 43290272)
159. Hansen MW, Merchant N. MRI of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: part 2, Differential diagnosis, risk stratification, and posttreatment MRI appearances. Am J Roentgenol: 2007; 189 1344 1352 (Pubitemid 350174793)
160. Nazarian S, Lima JA. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for risk stratification of arrhythmia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2008; 51 1375 1376
161. Assomull RG, Prasad SK, Lyne J et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, fibrosis, and prognosis in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2006; 48 1977 1985 (Pubitemid 44738448)
162. Koikkalainen JR, Antila M, Lotjonen JM et al. Early familial dilated cardiomyopathy: identification with determination of disease state parameter from cine MR image data. Radiology: 2008; 249 88 96
163. Shimizu I, Iguchi N, Watanabe H et al. Delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a novel technique to predict cardiac events in dilated cardiomyopathy patients. Int J Cardiol: 2010; 142 224 229
164. Giorgi B, Mollet NR, Dymarkowski S et al. Clinically suspected constrictive pericarditis: MR imaging assessment of ventricular septal motion and configuration in patients and healthy subjects. Radiology: 2003; 228 417 424 (Pubitemid 36910081)
165. Hancock EW. Differential diagnosis of restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis. Heart: 2001; 86 343 349 (Pubitemid 32800092)
166. Miller S, Riessen R. [MR imaging in cardiomyopathies]. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2005; 177 1497 505
167. Moreo A, Ambrosio G, De Chiara B et al. Influence of myocardial fibrosis on left ventricular diastolic function: noninvasive assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance and echo. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 437 443
168. Biagini E, Ragni L, Ferlito M et al. Different types of cardiomyopathy associated with isolated ventricular noncompaction. Am J Cardiol: 2006; 98 821 824 (Pubitemid 44301022)
169. Patlas M, Strohm O, Filipchuk N et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Can J Cardiol: 2008; 24 798
170. Sen-Chowdhry S, Prasad SK, Syrris P et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy revisited: comparison with task force criteria and genotype. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2006; 48 2132 2140 (Pubitemid 44738443)
171. White RD, Trohman RG, Flamm SD et al. Right ventricular arrhythmia in the absence of arrhythmogenic dysplasia: MR imaging of myocardial abnormalities. Radiology: 1998; 207 743 751 (Pubitemid 28279908)
172. Crean A, Greenwood JP, Plein S. Contribution of noninvasive imaging to the diagnosis and follow-up of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 519 521
173. Yilmaz A, Kindermann I, Kindermann M et al. Comparative evaluation of left and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: differences in complication rate and diagnostic performance. Circulation: 2010; 122 900 909
174. Gutberlet M, Spors B, Thoma T et al. Suspected chronic myocarditis at cardiac MR: diagnostic accuracy and association with immunohistologically detected inflammation and viral persistence. Radiology: 2008; 246 401 409
175. Mahrholdt H, Goedecke C, Wagner A et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of human myocarditis: a comparison to histology and molecular pathology. Circulation: 2004; 109 1250 1258 (Pubitemid 38379570)
176. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Deluigi CC et al. Presentation, patterns of myocardial damage, and clinical course of viral myocarditis. Circulation: 2006; 114 1581 1590 (Pubitemid 44547428)
177. Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A JACC White Paper. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2009; 53 1475 1487
178. Lin CH, Chang WN, Chua S et al. Idiopathic hypereosinophilia syndrome with loeffler endocarditis, embolic cerebral infarction, and left hydranencephaly: a case report. Acta Neurol Taiwan: 2009; 18 207 212
179. Germans T, van Rossum AC. The use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to determine the aetiology of left ventricular disease and cardiomyopathy. Heart: 2008; 94 510 518 (Pubitemid 351441415)
180. Harris SR, Glockner J, Misselt AJ et al. Cardiac MR imaging of nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am: 2008; 16 165 183, vii (Pubitemid 351649375)
181. Duckett SG, Chiribiri A, Ginks MR et al. Cardiac MRI to investigate myocardial scar and coronary venous anatomy using a slow infusion of dimeglumine gadobenate in patients undergoing assessment for cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2011; 33 87 95
182. Chiribiri A, Kelle S, Köhler U et al. Magnetic resonance cardiac vein imaging: relation to mitral valve annulus and left circumflex coronary artery. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2008; 1 729 738
183. Jongbloed MR, Lamb HJ, Bax JJ et al. Noninvasive visualization of the cardiac venous system using multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2005; 45 749 753 (Pubitemid 40278974)
184. Kim YH, Marom EM, Herndon JE et al. Pulmonary vein diameter, cross-sectional area, and shape: CT analysis. Radiology: 2005; 235 43 49; discussion 9-50 (Pubitemid 40432233)
185. Van de Veire NR, Marsan NA, Schuijf JD et al. Noninvasive imaging of cardiac venous anatomy with 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography and noninvasive assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by 3-dimensional tissue synchronization imaging in patients with heart failure scheduled for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol: 2008; 101 1023 1029
186. Choure AJ, Garcia MJ, Hesse B et al. In vivo analysis of the anatomical relationship of coronary sinus to mitral annulus and left circumflex coronary artery using cardiac multidetector computed tomography: implications for percutaneous coronary sinus mitral annuloplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2006; 48 1938 1945 (Pubitemid 44755342)
187. Tops LF, Van de Veire NR, Schuijf JD et al. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary sinus anatomy and its relation to the mitral valve annulus: implications for percutaneous mitral annuloplasty. Circulation: 2007; 115 1426 1432 (Pubitemid 46648378)
188. Bleeker GB, Kaandorp TA, Lamb HJ et al. Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation: 2006; 113 969 976 (Pubitemid 43879472)
189. Delgado V, van Bommel RJ, Bertini M et al. Relative merits of left ventricular dyssynchrony, left ventricular lead position, and myocardial scar to predict long-term survival of ischemic heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation: 2011; 123 70 78
190. Marsan NA, Westenberg JJ, Ypenburg C et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: relative merits of left ventricular dyssynchrony and scar tissue. Eur Heart J: 2009; 30 2360 2367
191. White JA, Yee R, Yuan X et al. Delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intraventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2006; 48 1953 1960 (Pubitemid 44738444)
192. Ypenburg C, Schalij MJ, Bleeker GB et al. Impact of viability and scar tissue on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischaemic heart failure patients. Eur Heart J: 2007; 28 33 41 (Pubitemid 46134955)
193. England B, Lee A, Tran T et al. Magnetic resonance criteria for future trials of cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2005; 7 827 834 (Pubitemid 41770062)
194. Muellerleile K, Stork A, Bansmann M et al. Detection of mechanical ventricular asynchrony by high temporal resolution cine MRI. Eur Radiol: 2008; 18 1329 1337
195. Zwanenburg JJ, Gotte MJ, Kuijer JP et al. Timing of cardiac contraction in humans mapped by high-temporal-resolution MRI tagging: early onset and late peak of shortening in lateral wall. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol: 2004; 286 H1872 H1880 (Pubitemid 38525476)
196. Truong QA, Singh JP, Cannon CP et al. Quantitative analysis of intraventricular dyssynchrony using wall thickness by multidetector computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2008; 1 772 781
197. Choi EY, Choi BW, Kim SA et al. Patterns of late gadolinium enhancement are associated with ventricular stiffness in patients with advanced non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail: 2009; 11 573 580
198. Maron MS, Appelbaum E, Harrigan CJ et al. Clinical profile and significance of delayed enhancement in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail: 2008; 1 184 191
199. Jain A, Tandri H, Calkins H et al. Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2008; 10 32
200. Tandri H, Saranathan M, Rodriguez ER et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial fibrosis in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy using delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2005; 45 98 103 (Pubitemid 40052034)
201. Chyou JY, Biviano A, Magno P et al. Applications of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in percutaneous ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol: 2009; 26 47 57
202. Hamdan A, Charalampos K, Roettgen R et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for characterization of pulmonary vein morphology before radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol: 2009; 104 1540 1546
203. Mansour M, Holmvang G, Sosnovik D et al. Assessment of pulmonary vein anatomic variability by magnetic resonance imaging: implications for catheter ablation techniques for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol: 2004; 15 387 393 (Pubitemid 38510093)
204. Jongbloed MR, Dirksen MS, Bax JJ et al. Atrial fibrillation: multi-detector row CT of pulmonary vein anatomy prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation - initial experience. Radiology: 2005; 234 702 709 (Pubitemid 40250811)
205. Martinek M, Nesser HJ, Aichinger J et al. Accuracy of integration of multislice computed tomography imaging into three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping for real-time guided radiofrequency ablation of left atrial fibrillation-influence of heart rhythm and radiofrequency lesions. J Interv Card Electrophysiol: 2006; 17 85 92 (Pubitemid 46434831)
206. Martinek M, Nesser HJ, Aichinger J et al. Impact of integration of multislice computed tomography imaging into three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping on clinical outcomes, safety, and efficacy using radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol: 2007; 30 1215 1223 (Pubitemid 47493124)
207. Jongbloed MR, Bax JJ, Lamb HJ et al. Multislice computed tomography versus intracardiac echocardiography to evaluate the pulmonary veins before radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a head-to-head comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2005; 45 343 350 (Pubitemid 40186782)
208. Kistler PM, Rajappan K, Jahngir M et al. The impact of CT image integration into an electroanatomic mapping system on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol: 2006; 17 1093 1101 (Pubitemid 44401569)
209. Dill T, Neumann T, Ekinci O et al. Pulmonary vein diameter reduction after radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation evaluated by contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation: 2003; 107 845 850 (Pubitemid 36241042)
210. Kluge A, Dill T, Ekinci O et al. Decreased pulmonary perfusion in pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency ablation: assessment with dynamic magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. Chest: 2004; 126 428 437 (Pubitemid 39093427)
211. Neumann T, Kuniss M, Conradi G et al. Pulmonary vein stenting for the treatment of acquired severe pulmonary vein stenosis after pulmonary vein isolation: clinical implications after long-term follow-up of 4 years. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol: 2009; 20 251 257
212. Packer DL, Keelan P, Munger TM et al. Clinical presentation, investigation, and management of pulmonary vein stenosis complicating ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation: 2005; 111 546 554 (Pubitemid 40216481)
213. Peters DC, Wylie JV, Hauser TH et al. Recurrence of atrial fibrillation correlates with the extent of post-procedural late gadolinium enhancement: a pilot study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 308 316
214. Barrett CD, Di Biase L, Natale A. How to identify and treat patient with pulmonary vein stenosis post atrial fibrillation ablation. Curr Opin Cardiol: 2009; 24 42 49
215. Burgstahler C, Trabold T, Kuettner A et al. Visualization of pulmonary vein stenosis after radio frequency ablation using multi-slice computed tomography: initial clinical experience in 33 patients. Int J Cardiol: 2005; 102 287 291 (Pubitemid 40854044)
216. Malyar NM, Schlosser T, Barkhausen J et al. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography. Cardiology: 2008; 109 126 134
217. O'Brien KR, Gabriel RS, Greiser A et al. Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2009; 11 49
218. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A et al. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology: 2006; 240 47 55 (Pubitemid 43904342)
219. Halpern EJ, Mallya R, Sewell M et al. Differences in aortic valve area measured with CT planimetry and echocardiography (continuity equation) are related to divergent estimates of left ventricular outflow tract area. Am J Roentgenol: 2009; 192 1668 1673
220. LaBounty TM, Sundaram B, Agarwal P et al. Aortic valve area on 64-MDCT correlates with transesophageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis. Am J Roentgenol: 2008; 191 1652 1658
221. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A et al. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology: 2007; 244 745 754 (Pubitemid 47292085)
222. Gelfand EV, Hughes S, Hauser TH et al. Severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimizing correlation with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2006; 8 503 507
223. Kozerke S, Schwitter J, Pedersen EM et al. Aortic and mitral regurgitation: quantification using moving slice velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2001; 14 106 112 (Pubitemid 32709468)
224. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A et al. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2007; 26 1436 1443 (Pubitemid 350291270)
225. Tanaka K, Makaryus AN, Wolff SD. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2007; 9 799 805 (Pubitemid 47463908)
226. Lin SJ, Brown PA, Watkins MP et al. Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area with magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2004; 44 133 137 (Pubitemid 38968471)
227. Kon MW, Myerson SG, Moat NE et al. Quantification of regurgitant fraction in mitral regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of techniques. J Heart Valve Dis: 2004; 13 600 607
228. Kilner PJ, Sievers B, Meyer GP et al. Double-chambered right ventricle or sub-infundibular stenosis assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2002; 4 373 379 (Pubitemid 34983290)
229. Kivelitz DE, Dohmen PM, Lembcke A et al. Visualization of the pulmonary valve using cine MR imaging. Acta Radiol: 2003; 44 172 176
230. Rebergen SA, Chin JG, Ottenkamp J et al. Pulmonary regurgitation in the late postoperative follow-up of tetralogy of Fallot. Volumetric quantitation by nuclear magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Circulation: 1993; 88 2257 2266 (Pubitemid 23326106)
231. Therrien J, Provost Y, Merchant N et al. Optimal timing for pulmonary valve replacement in adults after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Am J Cardiol: 2005; 95 779 782 (Pubitemid 40332662)
232. Stollberger C, Kopsa W, Finsterer J. Non-compaction of the right atrium and left ventricle in Ebstein's malformation. J Heart Valve Dis: 2006; 15 719 720
233. Reynier C, Garcier J, Legault B et al. [Cross-sectional imaging of post endocarditis paravalvular myocardial abscesses of native mitral valves: 4 cases]. J Radiol: 2001; 82 665 669 (Pubitemid 32624767)
234. LaBounty TM, Agarwal PP, Chughtai A et al. Hemodynamic and functional assessment of mechanical aortic valves using combined echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr: 2009; 3 161 167
235. Schultz CJ, Weustink A, Piazza N et al. Geometry and degree of apposition of the CoreValve ReValving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2009; 54 911 918
236. Harris KM, Ang E, Lesser JR et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for detection of an abscess associated with prosthetic valve endocarditis: a case report. Heart Surg Forum: 2007; 10 E186 E187
237. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA et al. Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2006; 48 1658 1665 (Pubitemid 44528167)
238. Tops LF, Delgado V, van der Kley F et al. Percutaneous aortic valve therapy: clinical experience and the role of multi-modality imaging. Heart: 2009; 95 1538 1546
239. Wood DA, Tops LF, Mayo JR et al. Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol: 2009; 103 1295 1301
240. Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2008; 1 321 330 (Pubitemid 351681425)
241. Kahlert P, Plicht B, Janosi RA et al. The role of imaging in percutaneous mitral valve repair. Herz: 2009; 34 458 467
242. Delgado V, Tops LF, Schuijf JD et al. Assessment of mitral valve anatomy and geometry with multislice computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 556 565
243. Rienmuller R, Groll R, Lipton MJ. CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. Radiol Clin North Am: 2004; 42 587 601, vi (Pubitemid 38749104)
244. Wang ZJ, Reddy GP, Gotway MB et al. CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. Radiographics: 2003; 23 S167 S180 (Pubitemid 38037242)
245. Rifkin RD, Mernoff DB. Noninvasive evaluation of pericardial effusion composition by computed tomography. Am Heart J: 2005; 149 1120 1127 (Pubitemid 40848159)
246. Francone M, Dymarkowski S, Kalantzi M et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the pericardium. A pictorial essay. Radiol Med: 2005; 109 64 74; quiz 5-6
247. Misselt AJ, Harris SR, Glockner J et al. MR imaging of the pericardium. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am: 2008; 16 185 199, vii (Pubitemid 351636225)
248. Smith WH, Beacock DJ, Goddard AJ et al. Magnetic resonance evaluation of the pericardium. Br J Radiol: 2001; 74 384 392 (Pubitemid 32509762)
249. Troughton RW, Asher CR, Klein AL. Pericarditis. Lancet: 2004; 363 717 727 (Pubitemid 38296562)
250. Bauner K, Horng A, Schmitz C et al. New observations from MR velocity-encoded flow measurements concerning diastolic function in constrictive pericarditis. Eur Radiol: 2010; 20 1831 1840
251. Francone M, Dymarkowski S, Kalantzi M et al. Assessment of ventricular coupling with real-time cine MRI and its value to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Eur Radiol: 2006; 16 944 951 (Pubitemid 43380255)
252. Myers RB, Spodick DH. Constrictive pericarditis: clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics. Am Heart J: 1999; 138 219 232 (Pubitemid 29379671)
253. Nishimura RA. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: a diagnostic dilemma. Heart: 2001; 86 619 623 (Pubitemid 33086873)
254. Suh SY, Rha SW, Kim JW et al. The usefulness of three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography to delineate pericardial calcification in constrictive pericarditis. Int J Cardiol: 2006; 113 414 416 (Pubitemid 44708319)
255. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Lieberknecht M et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Sixteen-slice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of calcified pericardium. Circulation: 2003; 108 e48 e49
256. Khan NU, Yonan N. Does preoperative computed tomography reduce the risks associated with re-do cardiac surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg: 2009; 9 119 123
257. Schwefer M, Aschenbach R, Heidemann J et al. Constrictive pericarditis, still a diagnostic challenge: comprehensive review of clinical management. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg: 2009; 36 502 510
258. Chiles C, Woodard PK, Gutierrez FR et al. Metastatic involvement of the heart and pericardium: CT and MR imaging. Radiographics: 2001; 21 439 449 (Pubitemid 33707769)
259. Grebenc ML, Rosado de Christenson ML, Burke AP et al. Primary cardiac and pericardial neoplasms: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics: 2000; 20 1073 1103
260. Syed IS, Feng D, Harris SR et al. MR imaging of cardiac masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am: 2008; 16 137 164, vii (Pubitemid 351636224)
261. Kim JS, Kim HH, Yoon Y. Imaging of pericardial diseases. Clin Radiol: 2007; 62 626 631 (Pubitemid 46840208)
262. Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV et al. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy. Circulation: 1999; 100 1380 1386 (Pubitemid 29451696)
263. Sengupta PP, Eleid MF, Khandheria BK. Constrictive pericarditis. Circ J: 2008; 72 1555 1562
264. Spottiswoode B, Russell JB, Moosa S et al. Abnormal diastolic and systolic septal motion following pericardiectomy demonstrated by cine DENSE MRI. Cardiovasc J Afr: 2008; 19 208 209
265. Agelopoulou P, Kapatais A, Varounis C et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma with invasion into the right atrium. Report of two cases and review of the literature. Hepatogastroenterology: 2007; 54 2106 2108
266. Hoffmann U, Globits S, Schima W et al. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging of cardiac and paracardiac masses. Am J Cardiol: 2003; 92 890 895 (Pubitemid 37163597)
267. Juan O, Esteban E, Sotillo J et al. Atrial flutter and myocardial
268. Schnarkowski P, Wallner B, von Gumppenberg R et al. [Magnetic resonance tomography and magnetic resonance angiography of an infiltration of the left and right atria by a liver metastasis]. Röntgenpraxis: 1992; 45 98 99
269. Vanheste R, Vanhoenacker P, D'Haenens P. Primary cardiac lymphoma. JBR-BTR: 2007; 90 109 111 (Pubitemid 46797927)
270. van Beek EJ, Stolpen AH, Khanna G et al. CT and MRI of pericardial and cardiac neoplastic disease. Cancer Imaging: 2007; 7 19 26 (Pubitemid 47528073)
271. Kim EY, Choe YH, Sung K et al. Multidetector CT and MR imaging of cardiac tumors. Korean J Radiol: 2009; 10 164 175
272. Krombach GA, Spuentrup E, Buecker A et al. [Heart tumors: magnetic resonance imaging and multislice spiral CT]. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2005; 177 1205 1218 (Pubitemid 41290816)
273. Kraemer N, Balzer JC, Schoth F et al. [Atrial tumors in cardiac MRI]. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2009; 181 1038 1049
274. Mohrs OK, Nowak B, Petersen SE et al. Thrombus detection in the left atrial appendage using contrast-enhanced MRI: a pilot study. Am J Roentgenol: 2006; 186 198 205 (Pubitemid 46100381)
275. Hur J, Kim YJ, Lee HJ et al. Left atrial appendage thrombi in stroke patients: detection with two-phase cardiac CT angiography versus transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology: 2009; 251 683 690
276. Hur J, Kim YJ, Lee HJ et al. Cardiac computed tomographic angiography for detection of cardiac sources of embolism in stroke patients. Stroke: 2009; 40 2073 2078
277. Hur J, Kim YJ, Nam JE et al. Thrombus in the left atrial appendage in stroke patients: detection with cardiac CT angiography - a preliminary report. Radiology: 2008; 249 81 87
278. Martinez MW, Kirsch J, Williamson EE et al. Utility of nongated multidetector computed tomography for detection of left atrial thrombus in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 69 76
279. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Bonatti JO et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac 64-slice computed tomography in detecting atrial thrombi. Comparative study with transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac surgery. Invest Radiol: 2008; 43 794 801
280. Barkhausen J, Hunold P, Eggebrecht H et al. Detection and characterization of intracardiac thrombi on MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol: 2002; 179 1539 1544 (Pubitemid 35386657)
281. Bruder O, Waltering KU, Hunold P et al. [Detection and characterization of left ventricular thrombi by MRI compared to transthoracic echocardiography]. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2005; 177 344 349 (Pubitemid 40363281)
282. Paydarfar D, Krieger D, Dib N et al. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and surgical histopathology of intracardiac masses: distinct features of subacute thrombi. Cardiology: 2001; 95 40 47 (Pubitemid 32506960)
283. Weinsaft JW, Kim HW, Shah DJ et al. Detection of left ventricular thrombus by delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance prevalence and markers in patients with systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2008; 52 148 157 (Pubitemid 351885445)
284. Weinsaft JW, Kim RJ, Ross M et al. Contrast-enhanced anatomic imaging as compared to contrast-enhanced tissue characterization for detection of left ventricular thrombus. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 969 979
285. Araoz PA, Eklund HE, Welch TJ et al. CT and MR imaging of primary cardiac malignancies. Radiographics: 1999; 19 1421 1434
286. Kaminaga T, Takeshita T, Kimura I. Role of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of tumors in the cardiac region. Eur Radiol: 2003; 13 L1 L10 (Pubitemid 38008286)
287. O'Donnell DH, Abbara S, Chaithiraphan V et al. Cardiac tumors: optimal cardiac MR sequences and spectrum of imaging appearances. Am J Roentgenol: 2009; 193 377 387
288. Strotmann J. [Cardiac tumors - clinical symptoms, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic aspects]. Med Klin: 2008; 103 175 180 (Pubitemid 351437838)
289. Henrikson CA, Leng CT, Yuh DD et al. Computed tomography to assess possible cardiac lead perforation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol: 2006; 29 509 511
290. Hirschl DA, Jain VR, Spindola-Franco H et al. Prevalence and characterization of asymptomatic pacemaker and ICD lead perforation on CT. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol: 2007; 30 28 32 (Pubitemid 46114925)
291. Burgstahler C, Wohrle J, Kochs M et al. Magnetic resonance imaging to assess acute changes in atrial and ventricular parameters after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2007; 25 1136 1140 (Pubitemid 46870269)
292. Mohrs OK, Petersen SE, Erkapic D et al. Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale using contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI: a pilot study. Am J Roentgenol: 2005; 184 234 240 (Pubitemid 40040936)
293. Mohrs OK, Petersen SE, Erkapic D et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI before and after transcatheter occlusion of patent foramen ovale. Am J Roentgenol: 2007; 188 844 849
294. Nusser T, Hoher M, Merkle N et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transesophageal echocardiography in patients with transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2006; 48 322 329
295. Weber C, Weber M, Ekinci O et al. Atrial septal defects type II: noninvasive evaluation of patients before implantation of an Amplatzer Septal Occluder and on follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging compared with TEE and invasive measurement. Eur Radiol: 2008; 18 2406 2413
296. Sarikouch S, Peters B, Gutberlet M et al. Sex-specific pediatric percentiles for ventricular size and mass as reference values for cardiac MRI: assessment by steady-state free-precession and phase-contrast MRI flow. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging: 2010; 3 65 76
297. Vashist S, Singh GK. Acute myocarditis in children: current concepts and management. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med: 2009; 11 383 391
298. Siegel MJ. Multiplanar and three-dimensional multi-detector row CT of thoracic vessels and airways in the pediatric population. Radiology: 2003; 229 641 650 (Pubitemid 37467564)
299. Gilkeson RC, Markowitz AH, Ciancibello L. Multisection CT evaluation of the reoperative cardiac surgery patient. Radiographics: 2003; 23 S3 S17 (Pubitemid 38037226)
300. Eichhorn J, Fink C, Delorme S et al. Rings, slings and other vascular abnormalities. Ultrafast computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography in pediatric cardiology. Z Kardiol: 2004; 93 201 208 (Pubitemid 38406411)
301. Eichhorn JG, Fink C, Long F et al. [Multidetector CT for the diagnosis of congenital vascular anomalies and associated complications in newborns and infants]. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2005; 177 1366 1372 (Pubitemid 41482397)
302. Eichhorn JG, Ley S. [Congenital abnormalities of the aorta in children and adolescents]. Radiologe: 2007; 47 974 981 (Pubitemid 350172613)
303. Eichhorn JG, Long FR, Hill SL et al. Assessment of in-stent stenosis in small children with congenital heart disease using multi-detector computed tomography: a validation study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv: 2006; 68 11 20 (Pubitemid 44024455)
304. Gutberlet M, Abdul-Khaliq H, Grothoff M et al. [Evaluation of left ventricular volumes in patients with congenital heart disease and abnormal left ventricular geometry. Comparison of MRI and transthoracic 3-dimensional echocardiography]. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2003; 175 942 951 (Pubitemid 36903560)
305. Sarikouch S, Koerperich H, Boethig D et al. Reference values for atrial size and function in children and young adults by cardiac MR: a study of the German competence network congenital heart defects. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2011; 33 1028 1039
306. Cohen MS, Anderson RH, Cohen MI et al. Controversies, genetics, diagnostic assessment, and outcomes relating to the heterotaxy syndrome. Cardiol Young: 2007; 17 29 43 (Pubitemid 350237742)
307. Geva T, Vick GW 3rd, Wendt RE et al. Role of spin echo and cine magnetic resonance imaging in presurgical planning of heterotaxy syndrome. Comparison with echocardiography and catheterization. Circulation: 1994; 90 348 356 (Pubitemid 24203698)
308. Hong YK, Park YW, Ryu SJ et al. Efficacy of MRI in complicated congenital heart disease with visceral heterotaxy syndrome. J Comput Assist Tomogr: 2000; 24 671 682 (Pubitemid 32204294)
309. Lee EY, Zurakowski D, Waltz DA et al. MDCT evaluation of the prevalence of tracheomalacia in children with mediastinal aortic vascular anomalies. J Thorac Imaging: 2008; 23 258 265
310. Lee EY, Siegel MJ, Hildebolt CF et al. MDCT evaluation of thoracic aortic anomalies in pediatric patients and young adults: comparison of axial, multiplanar, and 3D images. Am J Roentgenol: 2004; 182 777 784 (Pubitemid 38269545)
311. Ou P, Marini D, Celermajer DS et al. Non-invasive assessment of congenital pulmonary vein stenosis in children using cardiac-non-gated CT with 64-slice technology. Eur J Radiol: 2009; 70 595 599
312. Ou P, Celermajer DS, Calcagni G et al. Three-dimensional CT scanning: a new diagnostic modality in congenital heart disease. Heart: 2007; 93 908 913 (Pubitemid 47122036)
313. Oh KH, Choo KS, Lim SJ et al. Multidetector CT evaluation of total anomalous pulmonary venous connections: comparison with echocardiography. Pediatr Radiol: 2009; 39 950 954
314. Gilkeson RC, Ciancibello L, Zahka K. Pictorial essay. Multidetector CT evaluation of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. Am J Roentgenol: 2003; 180 973 980 (Pubitemid 36363035)
315. Selby JB, Poghosyan T, Wharton M. Asymptomatic partial anomalous pulmonary venous return masquerading as pulmonary vein occlusion following radiofrequency ablation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging: 2006; 22 719 722
316. Wang XM, Wu LB, Sun C et al. Clinical application of 64-slice spiral CT in the diagnosis of the Tetralogy of Fallot. Eur J Radiol: 2007; 64 296 301 (Pubitemid 47588745)
317. Beerbaum P, Korperich H, Barth P et al. Noninvasive quantification of left-to-right shunt in pediatric patients: phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging compared with invasive oximetry. Circulation: 2001; 103 2476 2482 (Pubitemid 32493374)
318. Beerbaum P, Korperich H, Esdorn H et al. Atrial septal defects in pediatric patients: noninvasive sizing with cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology: 2003; 228 361 369 (Pubitemid 36910073)
319. Durongpisitkul K, Tang NL, Soongswang J et al. Predictors of successful transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Cardiol: 2004; 25 124 130 (Pubitemid 38268093)
320. Piaw CS, Kiam OT, Rapaee A et al. Use of non-invasive phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging for estimation of atrial septal defect size and morphology: a comparison with transesophageal echo. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol: 2006; 29 230 234 (Pubitemid 43234684)
321. Thomson LE, Crowley AL, Heitner JF et al. Direct en face imaging of secundum atrial septal defects by velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients evaluated for possible transcatheter closure. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging: 2008; 1 31 40
322. Valente AM, Sena L, Powell AJ et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of sinus venosus defects: comparison to surgical findings. Pediatr Cardiol: 2007; 28 51 56
323. Rajiah P, Kanne JP. Computed tomography of septal defects. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr: 2010; 4 231 245
324. Beerbaum P, Parish V, Bell A et al. Atypical atrial septal defects in children: noninvasive evaluation by cardiac MRI. Pediatr Radiol: 2008; 38 1188 1194
325. Grosse-Wortmann L, Al-Otay A, Goo HW et al. Anatomical and functional evaluation of pulmonary veins in children by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2007; 49 993 1002
326. Riesenkampff EM, Schmitt B, Schnackenburg B et al. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage in young pediatric patients: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Cardiol: 2009; 30 458 464
327. Bass JE, Redwine MD, Kramer LA et al. Spectrum of congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava: cross-sectional imaging findings. Radiographics: 2000; 20 639 652
328. Greil GF, Powell AJ, Gildein HP et al. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary and systemic venous anomalies. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2002; 39 335 341 (Pubitemid 34084642)
329. Kersting-Sommerhoff BA, Diethelm L, Teitel DF et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of congenital heart disease: sensitivity and specificity using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Am Heart J: 1989; 118 155 161 (Pubitemid 19183591)
330. Sorensen TS, Korperich H, Greil GF et al. Operator-independent isotropic three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for morphology in congenital heart disease: a validation study. Circulation: 2004; 110 163 169 (Pubitemid 38924584)
331. Brown ML, Dearani JA, Danielson GK et al. The outcomes of operations for 539 patients with Ebstein anomaly. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2008; 135 1120 36
332. Malhotra SP, Petrossian E, Reddy VM et al. Selective right ventricular unloading and novel technical concepts in Ebstein's anomaly. Ann Thorac Surg: 2009; 88 1975 1981
333. Gutberlet M, Oellinger H, Ewert P et al. [Pre- and postoperative evaluation of ventricular function, muscle mass and valve morphology by magnetic resonance tomography in Ebstein's anomaly]. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2000; 172 436 442 (Pubitemid 30435906)
334. Bell A, Beerbaum P, Greil G et al. Noninvasive assessment of pulmonary artery flow and resistance by cardiac magnetic resonance in congenital heart diseases with unrestricted left-to-right shunt. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 1285 1291
335. Grosse-Wortmann L, Yun TJ, Al-Radi O et al. Borderline hypoplasia of the left ventricle in neonates: insights for decision-making from functional assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2008; 136 1429 1436
336. Shuhaiber JH, Ho SY, Rigby M et al. Current options and outcomes for the management of atrioventricular septal defect. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg: 2009; 35 891 900
337. Marijon E, Ou P, Fermont L et al. Diagnosis and outcome in congenital ventricular diverticulum and aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2006; 131 433 437 (Pubitemid 43121568)
338. McMahon CJ, Moniotte S, Powell AJ et al. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of congenital left ventricular aneurysms. Am J Cardiol: 2007; 100 310 315 (Pubitemid 47041994)
339. Ohlow MA. Congenital left ventricular aneurysms and diverticula: definition, pathophysiology, clinical relevance and treatment. Cardiology: 2006; 106 63 72
340. Hoppe UC, Dederichs B, Deutsch HJ et al. Congenital heart disease in adults and adolescents: comparative value of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and MR imaging. Radiology: 1996; 199 669 677 (Pubitemid 26157464)
341. Kellenberger CJ, Yoo SJ, Buchel ER. Cardiovascular MR imaging in neonates and infants with congenital heart disease. Radiographics: 2007; 27 5 18
342. Kersting-Sommerhoff BA, Diethelm L, Stanger P et al. Evaluation of complex congenital ventricular anomalies with magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J: 1990; 120 133 142 (Pubitemid 20210237)
343. Kersting-Sommerhoff BA, Seelos KC, Hardy C et al. Evaluation of surgical procedures for cyanotic congenital heart disease by using MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol: 1990; 155 259 266 (Pubitemid 20227847)
344. Kilner PJ, Geva T, Kaemmerer H et al. Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J: 2010; 31 794 805
345. Rutledge JM, Nihill MR, Fraser CD et al. Outcome of 121 patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Pediatr Cardiol: 2002; 23 137 145 (Pubitemid 36927889)
346. Salehian O, Schwerzmann M, Merchant N et al. Assessment of systemic right ventricular function in patients with transposition of the great arteries using the myocardial performance index: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation: 2004; 110 3229 3233 (Pubitemid 39525070)
347. Samyn MM. A review of the complementary information available with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and multi-slice computed tomography (CT) during the study of congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging: 2004; 20 569 578 (Pubitemid 40372373)
348. Sarikouch S, Schaeffler R, Korperich H et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for intensive care infants: safe and effective? Pediatr Cardiol: 2009; 30 146 152
349. Wood JC. Anatomical assessment of congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2006; 8 595 606
350. Chaturvedi RR, Redington AN. Pulmonary regurgitation in congenital heart disease. Heart: 2007; 93 880 889 (Pubitemid 46998997)
351. Geva T. Indications and timing of pulmonary valve replacement after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu: 2006; 11 22
352. Harrild DM, Berul CI, Cecchin F et al. Pulmonary valve replacement in tetralogy of Fallot: impact on survival and ventricular tachycardia. Circulation: 2009; 119 445 451
353. Henkens IR, van Straten A, Schalij MJ et al. Predicting outcome of pulmonary valve replacement in adult tetralogy of Fallot patients. Ann Thorac Surg: 2007; 83 907 911 (Pubitemid 46331828)
354. Oosterhof T, van Straten A, Vliegen HW et al. Preoperative thresholds for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation: 2007; 116 545 551 (Pubitemid 47450263)
355. Vliegen HW, van Straten A, de Roos A et al. Magnetic resonance imaging to assess the hemodynamic effects of pulmonary valve replacement in adults late after repair of tetralogy of fallot. Circulation: 2002; 106 1703 1707
356. Dincer TC, Basarici I, Calisir C et al. Ruptured aneurysm of noncoronary sinus of Valsalva: demonstration with magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol: 2008; 49 889 892
357. Feldman DN, Roman MJ. Aneurysms of the sinuses of Valsalva. Cardiology: 2006; 106 73 81
358. Karaaslan T, Gudinchet F, Payot M et al. Congenital aneurysm of sinus of valsalva ruptured into right ventricle diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Cardiol: 1999; 20 212 214 (Pubitemid 29152962)
359. Ozkara A, Cetin G, Mert M et al. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm: surgical approaches to complicated cases. ANZ J Surg: 2005; 75 51 54 (Pubitemid 40394705)
360. Bricker AO, Avutu B, Mohammed TL et al. Valsalva sinus aneurysms: findings at CT and MR imaging. Radiographics: 2010; 30 99 110
361. Crean A. Cardiovascular MR and CT in congenital heart disease. Heart: 2007; 93 1637 1647 (Pubitemid 350205570)
362. Dillman JR, Yarram SG, D'Amico AR et al. Interrupted aortic arch: spectrum of MRI findings. Am J Roentgenol: 2008; 190 1467 1474 (Pubitemid 351798553)
363. Eichhorn JG, Fink C, Delorme S et al. Magnetic resonance blood flow measurements in the follow-up of pediatric patients with aortic coarctation - a re-evaluation. Int J Cardiol: 2006; 113 291 298 (Pubitemid 44708327)
364. Geva T, Greil GF, Marshall AC et al. Gadolinium-enhanced 3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary blood supply in patients with complex pulmonary stenosis or atresia: comparison with x-ray angiography. Circulation: 2002; 106 473 478 (Pubitemid 34803693)
365. Grosse-Wortmann L, Al-Otay A, Yoo SJ. Aortopulmonary collaterals after bidirectional cavopulmonary connection or Fontan completion: quantification with MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging: 2009; 2 219 225
366. Kastler B. [Value of MRI in the evaluation of congenital anomalies of the heart and great vessels]. J Radiol: 2004; 85 1851 1853 (Pubitemid 39462829)
367. McLaren CA, Elliott MJ, Roebuck DJ. Vascular compression of the airway in children. Paediatr Respir Rev: 2008; 9 85 94
368. Nielsen JC, Powell AJ, Gauvreau K et al. Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of coarctation severity. Circulation: 2005; 111 622 628 (Pubitemid 40216490)
369. Prakash A, Torres AJ, Printz BF et al. Usefulness of magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of complex congenital heart disease in newborns and infants. Am J Cardiol: 2007; 100 715 721 (Pubitemid 47223151)
370. Prasad SK, Soukias N, Hornung T et al. Role of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of major aortopulmonary collateral arteries and partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. Circulation: 2004; 109 207 214 (Pubitemid 38114141)
371. Steffens JC, Bourne MW, Sakuma H et al. Quantification of collateral blood flow in coarctation of the aorta by velocity encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation: 1994; 90 937 943 (Pubitemid 24242765)
372. Boxt LM. Magnetic resonance and computed tomographic evaluation of congenital heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2004; 19 827 847 (Pubitemid 38788662)
373. Chandran A, Fricker FJ, Schowengerdt KO et al. An institutional review of the value of computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis of congenital cardiac malformations. Cardiol Young: 2005; 15 47 51 (Pubitemid 41388098)
374. Taylor AM, Dymarkowski S, Hamaekers P et al. MR coronary angiography and late-enhancement myocardial MR in children who underwent arterial switch surgery for transposition of great arteries. Radiology: 2005; 234 542 547 (Pubitemid 40139927)
375. Arnold R, Ley S, Ley-Zaporozhan J et al. Visualization of coronary arteries in patients after childhood Kawasaki syndrome: value of multidetector CT and MR imaging in comparison to conventional coronary catheterization. Pediatr Radiol: 2007; 37 998 1006 (Pubitemid 47423295)
376. Hong C, Woodard PK, Bae KT. Congenital coronary artery anomaly demonstrated by three dimensional 16 slice spiral CT angiography. Heart: 2004; 90 478 (Pubitemid 38530151)
377. Turner A, Gavel G, Coutts J. Vascular rings - presentation, investigation and outcome. Eur J Pediatr: 2005; 164 266 270 (Pubitemid 40603308)
378. Caputo GR, Kondo C, Masui T et al. Right and left lung perfusion: in vitro and in vivo validation with oblique-angle, velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. Radiology: 1991; 180 693 698
379. Fratz S, Hess J, Schwaiger M et al. More accurate quantification of pulmonary blood flow by magnetic resonance imaging than by lung perfusion scintigraphy in patients with fontan circulation. Circulation: 2002; 106 1510 1513
380. Klimes K, Abdul-Khaliq H, Ovroutski S et al. Pulmonary and caval blood flow patterns in patients with intracardiac and extracardiac Fontan: a magnetic resonance study. Clin Res Cardiol: 2007; 96 160 167 (Pubitemid 46363764)
381. Brenner LD, Caputo GR, Mostbeck G et al. Quantification of left to right atrial shunts with velocity-encoded cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol: 1992; 20 1246 1250
382. Hundley WG, Li HF, Lange RA et al. Assessment of left-to-right intracardiac shunting by velocity-encoded, phase-difference magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison with oximetric and indicator dilution techniques. Circulation: 1995; 91 2955 2960
383. Beerbaum P, Barth P, Kropf S et al. Cardiac function by MRI in congenital heart disease: impact of consensus training on interinstitutional variance. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2009; 30 956 966
384. Fratz S, Schuhbaeck A, Buchner C et al. Comparison of accuracy of axial slices versus short-axis slices for measuring ventricular volumes by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with corrected tetralogy of fallot. Am J Cardiol: 2009; 103 1764 1769
385. Zahn EM, Hellenbrand WE, Lock JE et al. Implantation of the melody transcatheter pulmonary valve in patients with a dysfunctional right ventricular outflow tract conduit early results from the u. s. Clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2009; 54 1722 1729
386. Buechel ER, Balmer C, Bauersfeld U et al. Feasibility of perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance in paediatric patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: 2009; 11 51
387. Gutberlet M, Boeckel T, Hosten N et al. Arterial switch procedure for D-transposition of the great arteries: quantitative midterm evaluation of hemodynamic changes with cine MR imaging and phase-shift velocity mapping-initial experience. Radiology: 2000; 214 467 475 (Pubitemid 30077703)
388. Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Chino S et al. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2006; 48 1946 1950 (Pubitemid 44738453)
389. Gutberlet M, Hoffmann J, Kunzel E et al. [Preoperative and postoperative imaging in patients with transposition of the great arteries]. Radiologe: 2011; 51 15 22
390. Cohen MD, Johnson T, Ramrakhiani S. MRI of surgical repair of transposition of the great vessels. Am J Roentgenol: 2010; 194 250 260
391. Fogel MA, Hubbard A, Weinberg PM. A simplified approach for assessment of intracardiac baffles and extracardiac conduits in congenital heart surgery with two- and three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J: 2001; 142 1028 1036 (Pubitemid 33131812)
392. Hager A, Kaemmerer H, Leppert A et al. Follow-up of adults with coarctation of the aorta: comparison of helical CT and MRI, and impact on assessing diameter changes. Chest: 2004; 126 1169 1176 (Pubitemid 39391247)
393. Krishnam MS, Tomasian A, Deshpande V et al. Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol: 2008; 43 411 420 (Pubitemid 351769899)
394. Masui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the evaluation of congenital cardiovascular disease pre- and postoperative states in infants and children. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2000; 12 1034 1042
395. Potthast S, Mitsumori L, Stanescu LA et al. Measuring aortic diameter with different MR techniques: comparison of three-dimensional (3D) navigated steady-state free-precession (SSFP), 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), 2D T2 black blood, and 2D cine SSFP. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2010; 31 177 184