Grouping axioms for more coherent ontology descriptions

INLG 2010 - Proceedings of the 6th International Natural Language Generation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 197-201

  Williams, Sandrsandra ^a   Power, Richard ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; HUMAN DOMAIN; LOGICAL STRUCTURE; NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION; RESEARCH GROUPS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84863404248     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. K. Bontcheva and Y. Wilks. 2004. Automatic report generation from ontologies: the MIAKT approach. In Nineth International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems (NLDB'2004), pages 214-225, Manchester, UK.
2. Hercules Dalianis and Eduard H. Hovy. 1996. Aggregation in natural language generation. In EWNLG '93: Selected papers from the Fourth European Workshop on Trends in Natural Language Generation, An Artificial Intelligence Perspective, pages 88-105, London, UK. Springer-Verlag. (Pubitemid 126054965)
3. Paolo Dongilli. 2008. Natural language rendering of a conjunctive query. Technical Report Knowledge Representation Meets Databases (KRDB) Research Centre Technical Report: KRDB08-3, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.
4. Dimitrios Galanis and Ion Androutsopoulos. 2007. Generating multilingual descriptions from linguistically annotated OWL ontologies: the NaturalOWL system. In Proceedings of the 11th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 143-146, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Dimitrios Galanis, George Karakatsiotis, Gerasimos Lampouras, and Ion Androutsopoulos. 2009. An open-source natural language generator for OWL ontologies and its use in protégé, and second life. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Demonstrations Session, pages 17-20, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Feikje Hielkema. 2009. Using Natural Language Generation to Provide Access to Semantic Metadata. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen.
7. Kaarel Kaljurand and Norbert Fuchs. 2007. Verbalizing OWL in Attempto Controlled English. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions OWLED 2007.
8. Holger Knublauch, Ray W. Fergerson, Natalya Fridman Noy, and Mark A. Musen. 2004. The Protégé OWL Plugin: An Open Development Environment for SemanticWeb Applications. In International Semantic Web Conference, pages 229-243. (Pubitemid 39743886)
9. Richard Power. 2010. Complexity assumptions in ontology verbalisation. In 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Michael Reape and Chris Mellish. 1999. Just what is aggregation anyway? In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 20-29, Toulouse, France.
11. Rolf Schwitter, Kaarel Kaljur, Anne Cregan, Catherine Dolbear, and Glen Hart. 2008. A comparison of three controlled natural languages for owl 1.1. In 4th OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop (OWLED 2008).
12. Paul Smart. 2008. Controlled Natural Languages and the Semantic Web. Technical Report Technical Report ITA/P12/SemWebCNL, School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton),.