Porcine androgenetic embryos develop to fetal stage in recipient mothers

Theriogenology

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 225-231

  Sembon, S ^a   Iwamoto, M ^a   Hashimoto, M ^a   Oishi, T ^a   Fuchimoto, D ^a   Suzuki, S ^a   Yazaki, S ^b   Onishi, A ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGROBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b Prime Tech Ltd   (Japan)

Author keywords

Androgenesis; Embryo development; Enucleated oocytes; IVF; Pig

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FETUS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HAPLOIDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OOCYTE; PARTHENOGENESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SPERMATOZOON; SWINE; Y CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FETUS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HAPLOIDY; MALE; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; OOCYTES; PARTHENOGENESIS; PREGNANCY; SPERMATOZOA; SWINE; Y CHROMOSOME;

OVIS ARIES; SUIDAE; SUS;

EID: 84863399188     PISSN: 0093691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.01.021     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barton S.C., Surani M.A., Norris M.L. Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development. Nature 1984, 311:374-376.
2. McGrath J., Solter D. Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 1984, 37:179-183.
3. Kaufman M.H., Lee K.K., Speirs S. Post-implantation development and cytogenetic analysis of diandric heterozygous diploid mouse embryos. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1989, 52:15-18.
4. Surani M.A., Barton S.C., Norris M.L. Nuclear transplantation in the mouse: heritable differences between parental genomes after activation of the embryonic genome. Cell 1986, 45:127-136.
5. Latham K.E., Solter D. Effect of egg composition on the developmental capacity of androgenetic mouse embryos. Development 1991, 113:561-568.
6. Hagemann L.J., Peterson A.J., Weilert L.L., Lee R.S., Tervit H.R. In vitro and early in vivo development of sheep gynogenones and putative androgenones. Mol Reprod Dev 1998, 50:154-162.
7. Matsukawa K., Turco M.Y., Scapolo P.A., Reynolds L., Ptak G., Loi P. Development of sheep androgenetic embryos is boosted following transfer of male pronuclei into androgenetic hemizygotes. Clon Stem Cells 2007, 9:374-381.
8. Lagutina I., Lazzari G., Duchi R., Galli C. Developmental potential of bovine androgenetic and parthenogenetic embryos: a comparative study. Biol Reprod 2004, 70:400-405.
9. Kono T., Sotomaru Y., Sato Y., Nakahara T. Development of androgenetic mouse embryos produced by in vitro fertilization of enucleated oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1993, 34:43-46.
10. Obata Y., Ono Y., Akuzawa H., Kwon O.Y., Yoshizawa M., Kono T. Post-implantation development of mouse androgenetic embryos produced by in-vitro fertilization of enucleated oocytes. Hum Reprod 2000, 15:874-880.
11. Bavister B.D., Leibfried M.L., Lieberman G. Development of preimplantation embryos of the golden hamster in a defined culture medium. Biol Reprod 1983, 28:235-247.
12. Kikuchi K., Onishi A., Kashiwazaki N., Iwamoto M., Noguchi J., Kaneko H., et al. Successful piglet production after transfer of blastocysts produced by a modified in vitro system. Biol Reprod 2002, 66:1033-1041.
13. Funahashi H., Cantley T.C., Day B.N. Synchronization of meiosis in porcine oocytes by exposure to dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate improves developmental competence following in vitro fertilization. Biol Reprod 1997, 57:49-53.
14. Petters R.M., Wells K.D. Culture of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1993, 48(Suppl):61-73.
15. Onishi A., Iwamoto M., Akita T., Mikawa S., Takeda K., Awata T., et al. Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science 2000, 289:1188-1190.
16. Yoshioka K., Suzuki C., Tanaka A., Anas I.M., Iwamura S. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol Reprod 2002, 66:112-119.
17. Kikuchi K., Nagai T., Kashiwazaki N., Ikeda H., Noguchi J., Shimada A., et al. Cryopreservation and ensuing in vitro fertilization ability of boar spermatozoa from epididymides stored at 4 degrees C. Theriogenology 1998, 50:615-623.
18. Suzuki K., Asano A., Eriksson B., Niwa K., Nagai T., Rodriguez-Martinez H. Capacitation status and in vitro fertility of boar spermatozoa: effects of seminal plasma, cumulus-oocyte-complexes-conditioned medium and hyaluronan. Int J Androl 2002, 25:84-93.
19. Sembon S., Suzuki S., Fuchimoto D., Iwamoto M., Kawarasaki T., Onishi A. Sex identification of pigs using polymerase chain reaction amplification of the amelogenin gene. Zygote 2008, 16:327-332.
20. Funahashi H., Cantley T.C., Stumpf T.T., Terlouw S.L., Day B.N. In vitro development of in vitro-matured porcine oocytes following chemical activation or in vitro fertilization. Biol Reprod 1994, 50:1072-1077.
21. Funahashi H., Kim N.H., Stumpf T.T., Cantley T.C., Day B.N. Presence of organic osmolytes in maturation medium enhances cytoplasmic maturation of porcine oocytes. Biol Reprod 1996, 54:1412-1419.
22. Rath D., Niemann H., Torres C.R. In vitro development to blastocysts of early porcine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro. Theriogenology 1995, 43:913-926.
23. Macháty Z., Day B.N., Prather R.S. Development of early porcine embryos in vitro and in vivo. Biol Reprod 1998, 59:451-455.
24. Han Y.M., Wang W.H., Abeydeera L.R., Petersen A.L., Kim J.H., Murphy C., et al. Pronuclear location before the first cell division determines ploidy of polyspermic pig embryos. Biol Reprod 1999, 61:1340-1346.
25. Kure-Bayashi S., Miyake M., Katayama M., Miyano T., Kato S. Development of porcine blastocysts from in vitro- matured and activated haploid and diploid oocytes. Theriogenology 1996, 46:1027-1036.
26. Cha S.K., Kim N.H., Lee S.M., Baik C.S., Lee H.T., Chung K.S. Effect of cytochalasin B and cycloheximide on the activation rate, chromosome constituent and in vitro development of porcine oocytes following parthenogenetic stimulation. Reprod Fertil Dev 1997, 9:441-446.
27. Lee J.W., Tian X.C., Yang X. Optimization of parthenogenetic activation protocol in porcine. Mol Reprod Dev 2004, 68:51-57.
28. Kim N.H., Uhm S.J., Ju J.Y., Lee H.T., Chung K.S. Blastocoele formation and cell allocation to the inner cell mass and trophectoderm in haploid and diploid pig parthenotes developing in vitro. Zygote 1997, 5:365-370.
29. Latham K.E., Akutsu H., Patel B., Yanagimachi R. Comparison of gene expression during preimplantation development between diploid and haploid mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 2002, 67:386-392.