Perceived performance of decentralised water systems: A survey approach

Water Science and Technology: Water Supply

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 516-526

  Moglia, Magnus ^a   Sharma, Ashok ^a   Alexander, Kim ^a   Mankad, Aditi ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Community engagement; Decentralised systems; Social learning; Survey methods

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC POLICY; WATER RESOURCES; WATERWORKS;

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT; DECENTRALISED SYSTEMS; GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES; MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION; PERCEIVED PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL LEARNING; SURVEY METHODS; URBAN WATER SERVICES;

SURVEYS;

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; DATA ACQUISITION; DECENTRALIZATION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; LEARNING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MAINTENANCE; PERCEPTION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; SERVICE PROVISION; URBAN AREA; WATER SUPPLY;

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BIOSAFETY; DECENTRALIZATION; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; RURAL AREA; URBAN AREA; WATER SUPPLY;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 84863393359     PISSN: 16069749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2011.081     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alexander, K. S., Levett, K. J. & Vanderzalm, J. L. 2010 Community management of onsite wastewater treatment systems- what they want in Mount Gambier, South Australia. Water Practice and Technology 5 (1), 1-10.
2. Babbie, E. 1995 The Practice of Social Research. Wadsworth Publishing Company, US.
3. Biggs, C, Ryan, C, Wiseman, J. & Larsen, K. 2009 Distributed Water Systems: A Networked and Localised Approach for Sustainable Water Services. Victorian Eco-Innovation Lab (VEIL), Melbourne, Australia.
4. Cook, S., Tjandraatmadja, G., Ho, A. & Sharma, A. 2009. Definition of Decentralised Systems in the South East Queensland Context. Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report No. 12. CSIRO Land and Water, Melbourne, Australia.
5. Dillman, D. 2007 Mail and Internet Surveys: the Tailored Design Method. Wiley, New York, US.
6. Geels, F. W. 2002 Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case study. Research Policy 31 (8-9), 1257-1274.
7. Geels, F. W. 2005 Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: refining the coevolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 72 (6), 681-696. (Pubitemid 40792392)
8. Goddard, M. 2006 Urban greywater reuse at the D'LUX development. Desalination 188 (1-3), 135-140. (Pubitemid 43137480)
9. Hurlimann, A. 2008 Community Attitudes to Recycled Water Use: an Urban Australian Case Study: Part 2. Research Report 56.CRC for Water Quality and Treatment, Adelaide, Australia.
10. CRC for Water Quality and Treatment, Adelaide, Australia. Hurlimann, A. & Dolnicar, S. 2009 When public opposition defeats alternative water projects: the case of Toowoomba Australia. Water Research 44 (1), 287-297.
11. Hurlimann, A. & McKay, J. 2004 Attitudes to reclaimed water for domestic use: part 2. Trust, water. Journal of the Australian Water Association 31 (5), 40-45. (Pubitemid 351249952)
12. Hurlimann, A. & McKay, J. M. 2006 What attributes of recycled water make it fit for residential purposes? The Mawson Lakes experience. Desalination 187 (1-3), 167-177. (Pubitemid 43137447)
13. Mankad, A. & Tapsuwan, S. 2010 Review of socio-economic drivers of community acceptance and adoption of decentralised systems. Journal of Environmental Management 92 (3), 380-391.
14. Marks, J. S. 2006 Taking the public seriously: the case of potable and non-potable reuse. Desalination 187 (1-3), 137-47. (Pubitemid 43137444)
15. Marks, J. S. & Zadaroznyj, M. 2005 Managing Sustainable urban water reuse: structural contexts and cultures of trust. Society and Natural Resources 18 (6), 557-572. (Pubitemid 40990412)
16. Moglia, M. 2011 Householder Survey Data on the Web [Online]. CSIRO Land and Water. Available from: https://wiki.csiro.au/confluence/pages/ viewpageattachments.action?pageId=385123334&highlight=Capo+di+Monte. pdf#Home-attachment-Capo+di+Monte.pdf (accessed 27 July 2011).
17. Moglia, M. & Sharma, A. S. 2009 Incorporating the Social Dimension into the Assessment of Urban Water Services: With a Particular Focus on Greenfield Developments. Water for a Healthy Country Flagship Report Series. CSIRO Land and Water, Melbourne, Australia.
18. Moglia, M., Cook, S., Sharma, A. & Burn, S. 2010 Assessing decentralised water solutions: towards a framework for adaptive learning. Water Resources Management 25 (1), 217-238.
19. Moglia, M., Alexander, K S. & Sharma, A. 2011 Discussion of the enabling environments for decentralised water systems. Water Science and Technology 63 (10), 2331-2339.
20. Nancarrow, B. E., Leviston, Z. & Tucker, D. I. 2009 Measuring the predictors of communities' behavioural decisions for potable reuse of wastewater. Water Science and Technology 60 (12), 3199-3209.
21. Nancarrow, B. E., Porter, N. B. & Leviston, Z. 2010 Predicting community acceptability of alternative urban water supply systems: a decision making model. Urban Water Journal 7 (3), 197-210.
22. Sharma, A. K, Grant, A. L., Grant, T, Pamminger, F. & Opray, L. 2009 Environmental and economic assessment of urban water services for a greenfield development. Environmental Engineering Science 26 (5), 921-934.
23. Söderberg, H. & Åberg, H. 2002 Assessing socio-cultural aspects of sustainable urban water systems: the case of Hamarby sjöstad. Water Science and Technology 2 (4), 203-210.
24. Tjandraatmadja, G., Cook, S., Sharma, A., Diaper, C, Grant, A., Toifl, M., Barron, O., Burn, S. & Gregory, A. 2008 ICON Water Sensitive Urban Developments. Water for a Healthy Flagship Report. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.