Peerage of Science: Will it work?

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 189-190

  Hettyey, Attila ^a,b   Griggio, Matteo ^a,c   Mann, Marlene ^a   Raveh, Shirley ^a   Schaedelin, Franziska C ^a   Thonhauser, Kerstin E ^a   Thoß, Michaela ^a   van Dongen, Wouter F D ^a   White, Joël ^a,d   Zala, Sarah M ^a   Penn, Dustin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LETTER; PEER REVIEW; SCIENCE;

PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; SCIENCE;

EID: 84863393155     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.005     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Horton R. Genetically modified food: consternation, confusion, and crack-up. Med. J. Aust. 2000, 172:148-149.
2. Wilson R. 'Referee factor' would reward a vital contribution. Nature 2006, 441:812.
3. Liu S.V. Why are people reluctant to join in open review?. Nature 2007, 447:1052.