Application of residual-based cumulative sum control charts for detecting faults in autocorrelated processes

Zhendong Ceshi Yu Zhenduan/Journal of Vibration, Measurement and Diagnosis

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 73-77

  Wang, Haitao ^a,b   Chen, Youming ^a   Chan, C W H ^c   Qin, Jianying ^c  

^a HUNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HENAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c Swire Properties LTD Hong Kong   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Autocorrelated process; Cumulative sum control chart; Fault detection; First order autoregressive model; Residual

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY RATE; AUTO-REGRESSIVE; AUTOCORRELATED PROCESS; AVERAGE RUN LENGTHS; CONTROL CHARTS; CUMULATIVE SUM CONTROL CHART; CUMULATIVE SUM CONTROL CHARTS; CUSUM CONTROL CHART; EFFECTIVE TOOL; FALSE ALARMS; FIRST ORDER AUTOREGRESSIVE MODEL; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; POOR PERFORMANCE; PROCESS ERRORS; RESIDUAL; SERIAL CORRELATION; TIME SERIES MODELS;

FAULT DETECTION; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES;

FLOWCHARTING;

EID: 84863385299     PISSN: 10046801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Jones L, Champ C, Rigdon S. The run length distribution of the CUSUM with estimated parameters [J]. Journal of Quality Technology. 2004, 36: 95-108.
2. Johnson R, Bagshaw M. The effect of serial correlation on the performance of CUSUM tests [J]. Technometrics, 1974, 15: 103-112.
3. Bagshaw M, Johnson R. The effect of serial correlation on the performance of CUSUM tests II [J]. Technometrics, 1975, 17: 73-80.
4. Alwan L. Effects of autocorrelation on control chart performance [J]. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 1992, 21: 1025-1049.
5. Montgomery D, Woodall W. A discussion on statistically based process monitoring and control [J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 1997, 29: 121-162.
6. Yashchin E. Performance of CUSUM control schemes for serially correlated observations [J]. Technometrics, 1993, 35: 37-52.
7. Wang Zhen, Du Lizhen, Cheng Yuansheng. Sensitivities of autoregressive coefficients of time series model and structural damage identification using control charts [J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis, 2010, 30 (4): 394-399. (in Chinese)
8. Huang Quanshui, Jiang Guohe, Xiao Jiankun, et al. Fault diagnosis of diesel engine based on auto regressive model and neural network [J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis, 2009, 29 (3): 362-365. (in Chinese)
9. Page E. Continuous inspection schemes [J]. Biometrika, 1954, 41: 100-115.
10. Siegmung D. Sequential analysis: Tests and confidence intervals [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985: 16-112.
11. Lu C, Reynolds M. CUSUM chart for monitorinj autocorrelated process [J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 2001, 33: 316-334.
12. Alwan L, Roberts H. Time series modeling for statistical process control [J]. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1988, 6: 87-95.
13. Montgomery D, Mastrangelo C. Some statistical psocess control methods for autocorrelated data [J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 1991, 23: 179-193.
14. VanBrackle L, Reynolds M. Ewma and cusum cont charts in the presence of correlation [J]. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 1997, 26: 979-1008.
15. Jones L, Champ C, Rigdon S. The run length dial bution of the CUSUM with estimated parameters [J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 2004, 36: 95-108.