Model selection and velocity estimation using novel priors for motion patterns

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21 - Proceedings of the 2008 Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1793-1800

  Wu, Shuang ^a   Lu, Hongjing ^a   Yuille, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; VISION;

COMPETING MODELS; MODEL SELECTION; MOTION PATTERN; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERFORMANCE; PRIOR MODELING; PSYCHOPHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS; SMOOTH ROTATION; STANDARD MODEL; VELOCITY ESTIMATION;

EXPANSION;

EID: 84863370534     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. J.F. Barraza and N.M. Grzywacz. Measurement of angular velocity in the perception of rotation. Vision Research, 42.2002.
2. J. Duchon. Lecture Notes in Math. 571, (eds Schempp, W. and Zeller, K.) 85-100. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979.
3. C. J. Duffy, and R. H. Wurtz. Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large field stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology. 65, 1329-1345. 1991.
4. T. Freeman, and M. Harris. Human sensitivity to expanding and rotating motion: effect of complementary masking and directional structure. Vision research, 32, 1992.
5. D. Knill and W. Richards (Eds). Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
6. A. Lee, A. Yuille, and H. Lu. Superior perception of circular/radial than translational motion cannot be explained by generic priors. VSS 2008.
7. H. Lu and A.L. Yuille. Ideal Observers for Detecting Motion: Correspondence Noise. NIPS 2005.
8. M. C. Morrone, D. C. Burr, and L. Vaina. Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion. Nature, 376, 507-509. 1995.
9. M. Morrone, M. Tosetti, D. Montanaro, A. Fiorentini, G. Cioni, and D. C. Burr. A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow revealed by fMRI. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1322-1328. 2000.
10. S. Nishida, K. Amano, M. Edwards, and D.R. Badcock. Global motion with multiple Gabors - A tool to investigate motion integration across orientation and space. VSS 2006.
11. R. Sekuler, S.N.J. Watamaniuk and R. Blake. Perception of Visual Motion. In Steven's Handbook of Experimental Psychology. Third edition. H. Pashler, series editor. S. Yantis, volume editor. J. Wiley Publishers. New York. 2002.
12. A.A. Stocker and E.P. Simoncelli. Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception Nature Neuroscience, vol. 9(4), pp. 578-585, Apr 2006.
13. A.A. Stocker, and E. Simoncelli. A Bayesian model of conditioned perception. Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems. 2007.
14. K. Tanaka, Y. Fukada, and H. Saito. Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the MST area of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology. 62, 642-656. 1989. (Pubitemid 19236119)
15. Y.Weiss, and E.H. Adelson. Slow and smooth: A Bayesian theory for the combination of local motion signals in human vision Technical Report 1624. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1998.
16. Y. Weiss, E.P. Simoncelli, and E.H. Adelson. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 598-604. 2002. (Pubitemid 34569003)
17. A.L. Yuille and N.M. Grzywacz. A computational theory for the perception of coherent visual motion. Nature, 333,71-74. 1988.