Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the introduction of innovative surgical procedures

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 256, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-9

  Strasberg, Steven M ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILE DUCT INJURY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BILE DUCTS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LEARNING CURVE; LENGTH OF STAY; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; THERAPIES, INVESTIGATIONAL;

EID: 84863333524     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825b381a     Document Type: Editorial

References (26)

1. Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Sampalis JS, et al. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group see comments. Lancet. 1992;340:1116-1119.
2. McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Baxter JN, et al. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1994;343:135-138.
3. Anonymous. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club published erratum appears in N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1517-1518 see comments. N Eng J Med. 1991;324:1073-1078.
4. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993;165:9-14.
5. BernardHR, Hartman TW. Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 93;165:533-535.
6. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, et al. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56,591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg. 2005;140:986-992.
7. Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C, et al. Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2003;290:2168-2173.
8. Waage A, NilssonM,Waage A, et al. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a populationbased study of 152, 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg. 2006;141:1207-1213.
9. NIH. The Belmont Report 1979: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Available at: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/ guidelines/belmont.html
10. Keus F, de Jong J, Gooszen H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;CD006231.
11. Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM. Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases.West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group see comments. Brit J Surg. 1996;83:1356-1360.
12. Wherry DC, Rob CG, Marohn MR, et al. An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in medical treatment facilities of the department of Defense. Ann Surg. 1994;220:626-634.
13. Joseph M, Phillips M, Farrell T, et al. Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate. A review and word of caution. Ann Surg. 2012;256:1195-1200.
14. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:101-125.
15. Rawlings A, Hodgett SE, Matthews BD, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:1-7.
16. Adamsen S, Hansen OH, Funch-Jensen P, et al. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184:571-578.
17. Aprea G, Coppola Bottazzi E, Guida F, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. J Surg Res. 2011;166:e109-e112.
18. Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Brit J Surg. 2011;98:1695-1702.
19. Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, et al. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2011;202:254-258.
20. Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS, et al. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Brit J Surg. 2010;97:1007-1012.
21. Lirici MM, Califano AD, Angelini P, et al. Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2011;202:45-52.
22. Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2011;254:22-27.
23. Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg. 2011;201:369-372.
24. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, et al. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1842-1848.
25. Porter ME. What is value in health care? New Engl J Med. 2011;363:2477-2481.
26. Strasberg SM, Ludbrook PA, Strasberg SM, et al. Who oversees innovative practice? Is there a structure that meets the monitoring needs of new techniques? J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:938-948.