Who donates their body to science? An international, multicenter, prospective study

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 208-216

  Cornwall, Jon ^a   Perry, Gary F ^b   Louw, Graham ^c   Stringer, Mark D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Bequest programs; Body donations; Cadaver; Donor characteristics; Gross anatomy education; Medical teaching

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CLINICAL TRIAL; DONOR; FAMILY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; IRELAND; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEW ZEALAND; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIGION; SOUTH AFRICA; TRANSPLANTATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CADAVER; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FAMILY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IRELAND; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; NEW ZEALAND; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RELIGION; SOUTH AFRICA; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 84863321269     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: 19359780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.1278     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Akinola OB. 2011. Formal body bequest program in Nigerian medical schools: When do we start? Anat Sci Educ 4: 239-242.
2. Anyanwu GE, Udemezue OO, Obikili EN. 2011. Dark age of sourcing cadavers in developing countries: A Nigerian survey. Clin Anat 24: 831-836.
3. Aziz MA, McKenzie JC, Wilson JS, Cowie RJ, Sylvanus AA, Dunn BK. 2002. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anat Rec 269: 20-32.
4. Ballala K, Shetty A, Malpe SB. 2011. Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding whole body donation among medical professionals in a hospital in India. Anat Sci Educ 4: 142-150.
5. Bolt S, Eisinga R, Venbrux E, Kuks JB, Gerrits PO. 2011. Personality and motivation for body donation. Ann Anat 193: 112-117.
6. Bolt S, Venbrux E, Eisinga R, Gerrits PO. 2012. Anatomist on the dissecting table? Dutch anatomical professionals' views on body donation. Clin Anat 25: 168-175.
7. Bolt S, Venbrux E, Eisinga R, Kuks JB, Veening JG, Gerrits PO. 2010. Motivation for body donation to science: More than an altruistic act. Ann Anat 192: 70-74.
8. Boulware LE, Ratner LE, Cooper LA, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. 2004. Whole body donation for medical science: A population-based study. Clin Anat 17: 570-577.
9. Cahill KC, Ettarh RR. 2008. Students attitudes to whole body donation are influenced by dissection. Anat Sci Educ 1: 212-216.
10. Christmas AB, Burris GW, Bogart TA, Sing RF. 2008. Organ donation: Family members not honoring patient wishes. J Trauma 65: 1095-1097.
11. Cornwall J. 2011. The diverse utility of wet prosections and plastinated specimens in teaching gross anatomy in New Zealand. Anat Sci Educ 4: 269-274.
12. Cornwall J, Stringer MD. 2009. The wider importance of cadavers: Educational and research diversity from a body bequest program. Anat Sci Educ 2: 234-237.
13. CSO. 2011. Central Statistics Office. Census 2011: Preliminary Results. Central Statistics Office Ireland, Cork, Ireland. URL: [accessed 7 December 2011].
14. Dluzen DE, Brammer CM, Bernard JC, Keyser ML. 1996. Survey of cadaveric donors to a body donation program: 1978-1993. Clin Anat 9: 183-192.
15. Dunne P. 2007. Fostering a Culture of Charitable Giving. Beehive.govt.nz. The official website of the New Zealand Government. New Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand. URL: [accessed 8 December 2011].
16. Fennell S, Jones DG. 1992. The bequest of human bodies for dissection: A case study in the Otago Medical School. N Z Med J 105: 472-474.
17. Gangata H, Ntaba P, Akol P, Louw G. 2010. The reliance on unclaimed cadavers for anatomical teaching by medical schools in Africa. Anat Sci Educ 3: 174-183.
18. Garment A, Lederer S, Rogers N, Boult L. 2007. Let the dead teach the living: The rise of body bequeathal in 20th-century America. Acad Med 82: 1000-1005.
19. GiveLife. 2011. GiveLife.org.nz. Campaign for an Effective Organ Donor System. GiveLife.org.nz, Christchurch, New Zealand. URL: [accessed 4 December 2011].
20. Gunderman RB. 2008. Giving ourselves: The ethics of anatomical donation. Anat Sci Educ 1: 217-219.
21. Halperin EC. 2007. The poor, the Black, and the marginalized as the source of cadavers in United States anatomical education. Clin Anat 20: 489-495.
22. Healey J, Murphy M. 2011. Is social marketing the answer to blood donation? In: Proceedings of the 2nd World Non-Profit and Social Marketing Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 2011, April 11-12. p 18. Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide (Ogilvy), New York, NY.
23. Jones DG. 1994. Use of bequeathed and unclaimed bodies in the dissecting room. Clin Anat 7: 102-107.
24. Jones DG, Whitaker MI. 2012. Anatomy's use of unclaimed bodies: Reasons against continued dependence on an ethically dubious practice. Clin Anat 25: 246-254.
25. Labuschagne BC, Mathey B. 2000. Cadaver profile at University of Stellenbosch Medical School, South Africa, 1956-1996. Clin Anat 13: 88-93.
26. Lagwinski M, Bernard JC, Keyser ML, Dluzen DE. 1998. Survey of cadaveric donor application files: 1978-1993. Clin Anat 11: 253-262.
27. Lin SC, Hsu J, Fan VY. 2009. "Silent virtuous teachers": Anatomical dissection in Taiwan. BMJ 339: 19-26.
28. McClea K, Stringer MD. 2010. The profile of body donors at the Otago School of Medical Sciences-Has it changed? N Z Med J 123: 9-17.
29. McHanwell S, Brenner E, Chirculescu AR, Drukker J, Van Mameren H, Mazzotti G, Pais D, Paulsen F, Plaisant O, Caillaud MM, Laforêt E, Riederer BM, Sañudo JR, Bueno-López JL, Doñate-Oliver F, Sprumont P, Teofilovski-Parapid G, Moxham BJ. 2008. The legal and ethical framework governing body donation in Europe-A review of current practice and recommendations for good practice. Eur J Anat 12: 1-24.
30. NZBS. 2011. New Zealand Blood Service Annual Report 2010/2011. New Zealand Blood Service, Auckland, New Zealand. Available at: URL:. Accessed on 23 July 2011.
31. Park JT, Jang Y, Park MS, Pae C, Park J, Hu KS, Park JS, Han SH, Koh KS, Kim HJ. 2011. The trend of body donation for education based on Korean social and religious culture. Anat Sci Educ 4: 33-38.
32. Pawlina W, Hammer RR, Strauss JD, Heath SG, Zhao KD, Sahota S, Regnier TD, Freshwater DR, Feeley MA. 2011. The hand that gives the rose. Mayo Clin Proc 86: 139-144.
33. Perry GF, Ettarh RR. 2009. Age modulates attitudes to whole body donation among medical students. Anat Sci Educ 2: 167-172.
34. Richardson R, Hurwitz B. 1995. Donors' attitudes towards body donation for dissection. Lancet 346: 277-279.
35. Rizzolo LJ, Stewart WB. 2006. Should we continue teaching anatomy by dissection when. ? Anat Rec 289B: 215-218.
36. Sehirli ÜS, Saka E, Sarikaya Ö. 2004. Attitudes of Turkish anatomists toward cadaver donation. Clin Anat 17: 677-681.
37. Sque M, Long T, Payne S, Allardyce D. 2008. Why relatives do not donate organs for transplants: "Sacrifice" or "gift of life?" J Adv Nurs 61: 134-144.
38. Statistics NZ. 2011. Statistics New Zealand, Tatauranga Aotearoa. Annual Report of Statistics New Zealand for the year ended 30 June 2011. Statistics New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand. URL: [accessed 5 December 2011].
39. Statistics SA. 2011. Statistics South Africa. Statistics South Africa Annual Report 2010/2011. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa. URL: [accessed 6 December 2011].
40. Trotman P. 2009. Donated to Science (DVD). Dunedin, New Zealand: PRN Films. 80 min. URL: [accessed 8 December 2011].
41. Wijbenga BS, Koning RH, Kooistra-Akse BJ, Bolt S, Kuks JB, Van Zanten-Timmer G, Veening JG, Gerrits PO. 2010. "Last-minute" donations influence actuarial prediction in an anatomical donation program. Ann Anat 192: 2-6.