Can we make the basilic vein larger? maneuvers to facilitate ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous access: A prospective cross-sectional study

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Mahler, Simon A ^a   Massey, Greta ^b   Meskill, Liliana ^c   Wang, Hao ^d   Arnold, Thomas C ^e  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio   (United States)

^d John Peter Smith Health Network   (United States)

^e Louisiana State University School of Medicine Shreveport   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BASAL VEIN; BLOOD PRESSURE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERIPHERAL VEIN; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOURNIQUET; VEIN DIAMETER;

EID: 84863289379     PISSN: 18651372     EISSN: 18651380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1865-1380-4-53     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Keyes LE, Frazee BW, Snoey ER, Simon BC, Christy D: Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 1999, 34(6):711-714.
2. Chinnock B, Thornton S, Hendey GW: Predictors of success in nurseperformed ultrasound-guided cannulation. J Emerg Med 2007, 33(4):401-405. (Pubitemid 350181256)
3. Mahler SA, Wang H, Lester C, Conrad SA: Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access in the emergency department using a modified seldinger technique. J Emerg Med 2010, 39(3):325-9.
4. Costantino TG, Kirtz JF, Satz WA: Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access vs. The external jugular vein as the initial approach to the patient with difficult vascular access. J Emerg Med .
5. Brannam L, Blaivas M, Lyon M, Flake M: Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients. Acad Emerg Med 2004, 11(12):1361-1363. (Pubitemid 39572897)
6. Costantino TG, Parikh AK, Satz WA, Fojtik JP: Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 2005, 46(5):456-461. (Pubitemid 41552395)
7. Steele R, Irvin CB: Central line mechanical complication rate in emergency medicine patients. Acad Emerg Med 2001, 8(2):204-207. (Pubitemid 32125348)
8. Panebianco NL, Fredette JM, Szyld D, Sagalyn EB, Pines JM, Dean AJ: What you see (sonographically) is what you get: vein and patient characteristics associated with successful ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in patients with difficult access. Acad Emerg Med 2009, 16(12):1298-1303.
9. Witting MD, Schenkel SM, Lawner BJ, Euerle BD: Effects of Vein Width and Depth on Ultrasound-guided Peripheral IV Success Rates. J Emerg Med 2010, 39(1):70-5.
10. Fronek A, Criqui MH, Denenberg J, Langer RD: Common femoral vein dimensions and hemodynamics including Valsalva response as a function of sex, age, and ethnicity in a population study. J Vasc Surg 2001, 33(5):1050-1056. (Pubitemid 33586350)
11. Mallory DL, Shawker T, Evans RG, McGee WT, Brenner M, Parker M, Morrison G, Mohler P, Veremakis C, Parrillo JE: Effects of clinical maneuvers on sonographically determined internal jugular vein size during venous cannulation. Crit Care Med 1990, 18(11):1269-1273. (Pubitemid 20377780)
12. Rippey JC, Pascu O, Jacobs I: Abdominal compression effectively increases the size of the common femoral vein, as measured by ultrasonography. Ann Emerg Med 2008, 52(4):446-452.
13. Stone MB, Price DD, Anderson BS: Ultrasonographic investigation of the effect of reverse Trendelenburg on the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein. J Emerg Med 2006, 30(2):211-213.
14. Verghese ST, Nath A, Zenger D Patel RI, Kaplan RF, Patel KM: The effects of the simulated Valsalva maneuver, liver compression, and/or Trendelenburg position on the cross-sectional area of the internal jugular vein in infants and young children. Anesth Analg 2002, 94(2):250-4. (Pubitemid 34106809)
15. Hedges JR, Weinshenker E, Dirksing R: Evaluation of venous distension device: potential aid for intravenous cannulation. Ann Emerg Med 1986, 15(5):540-543. (Pubitemid 16052105)
16. Korten E, Spronk S, Hoedt MT, et al: Distensibility of forearm veins in haemodialysis patients on duplex ultrasound testing using three provocation methods. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009, 38(3):375-380.
17. Nee PA, Picton AJ, Ralston DR, Perks AG: Facilitation of peripheral intravenous access: an evaluation of two methods to augment venous filling. Ann Emerg Med 1994, 24(5):944-946. (Pubitemid 24337516)
18. Planken RN, Keuter XH, Hoeks AP, Kooman JP, van der Sande FM, Kessels AG, Leiner T, Tordoir JH: Diameter measurements of the forearm cephalic vein prior to vascular access creation in end-stage renal disease patients: graduated pressure cuff versus tourniquet vessel dilatation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006, 21(3):802-806. (Pubitemid 43372934)
19. Planken RN, Keuter XH, Kessels AG, Hoeks AP, Leiner T, Tordoir JH: Forearm cephalic vein cross-sectional area changes at incremental congestion pressures: towards a standardized and reproducible vein mapping protocol. J Vasc Surg 2006, 44(2):353-358. (Pubitemid 44142936)
20. Van Bemmelen PS, Kelly P, Blebea J: Improvement in the visualization of superficial arm veins being evaluated for access and bypass. J Vasc Surg 2005, 42(5):957-962. (Pubitemid 41571965)