Auralist: Introducing serendipity into music recommendation

WSDM 2012 - Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 13-22

  Zhang, Yuan Cao ^a   Séaghdha, Diarmuid Ó ^a   Quercia, Daniele ^a   Jambor, Tamas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Cation; Collaborative; Diversi; Ltering; Metrics; Novelty; Recommender systems; Serendipity

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; COLLABORATIVE; DIVERSI; LTERING; METRICS; NOVELTY; SERENDIPITY;

ALGORITHMS; DATA MINING; POSITIVE IONS; WEBSITES;

RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84863241097     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2124295.2124300     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. G. Adomavicius and Y. O. Kwon. Towards more diverse recommendations: Item re-ranking methods for recommender systems. In Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems, 2009.
2. J. An, D. Quercia, and J. Crowcroft. This paper won't change your mind, but...: Why individuals seek diverse opinions (or why they don't). In Technical Report of the University of Cambridge, 2012.
3. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. Joural of Machine Learning Research, 2003.
4. O. Celma and P. Cano. From hits to niches?: or how popular artists can bias music recommendation and discovery. In ACM NETFLIX, 2008.
5. O. Celma and P. Herrera. A new approach to evaluating novel recommendations. In ACM RecSys, 2008.
6. D. A. Easley and J. M. Kleinberg. Networks, Crowds, and Markets - Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
7. T. L. Griffiths and M. Steyvers. Finding scientific topics. PNAS, 2004.
8. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, L. G. Terveen, and J. T. Riedl. Evaluating collaborative flltering recommender systems. ACM Transactions of Information Systems, 2004.
9. T. Hofmann. Latent semantic models for collaborative flltering. ACM Transactions of Information Systems, 2004.
10. Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Collaborative flltering for implicit feedback datasets. In Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2008.
11. T. Jambor and J. Wang. Optimizing multiple objectives in collaborative flltering. In ACM RecSys, 2010.
12. M. Levy and K. Bosteels. Music recommendation and the long tail. In WOMRAD, 2010.
13. G. Linden, B. Smith, and J. York. Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative flltering. IEEE Internet Computing, 2003.
14. A. K. McCallum. Mallet: A machine learning for language toolkit. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu, 2002.
15. S. M. McNee, J. Riedl, and J. A. Konstan. Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In ACM CHI EA, 2006.
16. T. Murakami, K. Mori, and R. Orihara. Metrics for evaluating the serendipity of recommendation lists. In JSAI, 2007.
17. E. Pariser. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Group USA, 2011.
18. P. Pu and L. Chen. A user-centric evaluation framework of recommender systems. In UCERSTI Workshop, ACM RecSys, 2010.
19. R. K. Ratner, B. E. Kahn, and D. Kahneman. Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. The Journal of Consumer Research, 1999.
20. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Reidl. Item-based collaborative flltering recommendation algorithms. In ACM WWW, 2001.
21. J. B. Schafer, J. Konstan, and J. Riedi. Recommender systems in e-commerce. In ACM EC, 1999.
22. X. Su and T. M. Khoshgoftaar. A survey of collaborative flltering techniques. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 2009.
23. K. Swearingen and R. Sinha. Beyond Algorithms: An HCI Perspective on Recommender Systems. SIGIR, 2001.
24. K. O. Takayuki Akiyama and M. Tanizaki. Proposal and evaluation of serendipitous recommendation method using general unexpectedness. In PRSAT, 2010.
25. S. Vargas and P. Castells. Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. ACM RecSys, 2011.
26. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 1998.
27. T. Zhuo, Z. Kuscik, J.-G. Liu, M. Medo, J. R. Wakeling, and Y.-C. Zhang. Solving the apparent diversity-accuracy dilemma of recommender systems. PNAS, 2010.
28. C.-N. Ziegler, G. Lausen, and S.-T. Lars. Taxonomy-driven computation of product recommendations. In ACM CIKM, 2004.
29. C.-N. Ziegler, S. M. McNee, J. A. Konstan, and G. Lausen. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In ACM WWW, 2005.