|
Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 684-687
|
Comparison of transparent conductive indium tin oxide, titanium-doped indium oxide, and fluorine-doped tin oxide films for dye-sensitized solar cell application
|
Author keywords
Dye sensitized solar cell; RF magnetron sputtering; Titanium doped indium oxide; Transparent conductive oxide
|
Indexed keywords
AFM;
AFTER-HEAT TREATMENT;
COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS;
DYE SENSITIZATION;
DYE-SENSITIZED SOLAR CELL;
DYE-SENSITIZED SOLAR CELLS;
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY;
FLUORINE DOPED TIN OXIDE;
FLUORINE-DOPED TIN OXIDE FILMS;
INDIUM TIN OXIDE;
LIGHT INTENSITY;
NEAR INFRARED;
PHOTOCONVERSION EFFICIENCY;
PHOTOVOLTAIC PERFORMANCE;
RADIO FREQUENCY MAGNETRON SPUTTERING;
RF-MAGNETRON SPUTTERING;
SODA LIME GLASS SUBSTRATE;
TITANIUM-DOPED INDIUM OXIDE;
TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE;
TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE OXIDES;
CONDUCTIVE FILMS;
ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY;
INDIUM;
INDIUM COMPOUNDS;
INFRARED RADIATION;
MAGNETRON SPUTTERING;
NANOCOMPOSITES;
PHOTOELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS;
SOLAR CELLS;
SUBSTRATES;
TIN;
TIN OXIDES;
TITANIUM;
TITANIUM OXIDES;
X RAY DIFFRACTION;
OXIDE FILMS;
|
EID: 84863239806
PISSN: 19750102
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.5370/JEET.2011.6.5.684 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (47)
|
References (9)
|