Is that a gun? the influence of features of bags and threat items on detection performance

Contemporary Ergonomics 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 17-22

  Liu, Xi ^a   Gale, Alastair ^a   Purdy, Kevin ^a   Song, Tao ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR PASSENGERS; CONSPICUITY; DETECTION PERFORMANCE; DETECTION RATES; POTENTIAL TERRORIST; POTENTIAL THREATS; VISUAL ANGLE; VISUAL COMPLEXITY; VISUAL SEARCH; X-RAY IMAGE;

ERGONOMICS;

EYE MOVEMENTS;

EID: 84863229957     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Alario, E-X. and Ferrand, L. 1999, A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(3), 531-552.
2. Gale, A.G., Mugglestone, M., Purdy, K.J. and McClumpha, A. 2000, Is airport baggage inspection just another medical image? In E.A. Krupinski (ed.) Medical Imaging: Image Perception and Performance. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging, 1(26), 184-192.
3. Heaps, C. and Handel, C.H. 1999, Similarity and features of natural textures, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 299-320.
4. Kundel, H.L. and La Follette, P.S. 1972, Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images, Radiology, 103, 523-528.
5. Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F. and Carmody, D. 1978, Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection, Investigative Radiology, 13, 175-181.
6. Krupinski, E.A., Berger, W.G., Dallas, W.J. and Roehrig, H. 2003, Searching for nodules: what features attract attention and influence detection? Academic Radiology, 10, 861-868.
7. Liu, X., Gale, A.G. and Purdy, K. in press, Development of Expertise in Detecting Terrorist Threats at Airports. In D. de Waard et al (Eds). Proceedings of the HFES Europe Conference, 2005.
8. Mackworth, N.H. 1974, Stimulus density limits the useful field of view. In: R.A. Monty and J.W. Senders (eds.), Eye movement and psychological processes, (Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey), 307-321.
9. McCarley, J.S., Kramer, A.F., Wickens, C.D., Vidoni, E.D. and Boot, W.R. 2004, Visual skills in airport-security screening, Psychological Science, 15, 302-306.
10. Nodine, C.F., Kundel, H.L., Toto, L.C. and Krupinski, E.A. 1992, Recording and analyzing eye-position data using a microcomputer workstation, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 24(3), 475-485.
11. Schwaninger, A., Hardmeier, D. and Hofer, F. 2004, Measuring visual abilities and visual knowledge of aviation security screeners, IEEE ICCST Proceedings, 258-264.
12. Schwartz, S.H. 1994, Visual Perception: A Clinical Orientation, (East Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton and Lange), 3-21.
13. Swensson, R.G. 1980, A two-stage detection model applied to skilled visual search by radiologists, Perception & Psychophysics, 27(1), 11-16.