An investigation of an adaptive poker player

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2256, Issue , 2001, Pages 189-200

  Kendall, Graham ^a   Willdig, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

ADAPTIVE LEARNING; DEVELOPING PROJECTS; HUMAN PLAYERS; IMPERFECT INFORMATION; INTERNAL LEARNING; PLAYING STRATEGIES; PLAYING STYLE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84863223687     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45656-2_17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Barone L. and While L. 1998. Evolving Computer Opponents to Play a Game of Simplified Poker. In proceedings of the 1998 International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC’98), pp 108-113
2. Barone L. and While L. 1999. An Adaptive Learning Model for Simplified Poker Using Evolutionary Algorithms. In proceedings of Congress of Evolutionary Computation 1999 (CEC’99), July 6-9, Washington DC, pp 153-160.
3. Barone L. and While L. 2000. Adaptive Learning for Poker. In proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2000 (GECCO’2000), July 10-12, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp 560-573
4. Billings, D., Papp, D., Schaeffer, J. and Szafron, D. 1998a. Poker as a Testbed for AI Research. In Proceedings of AI’98, The Twelfth Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Mercer, R.E., and Neufeld, E. (eds), Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, pp 228-238
5. th National AAAI Conference (AAAI-98), pp 493-499
6. Billings, D., Peňa, L P., Schaeffer, J. and Szafron, D. 1999. Using Probabilistic Knowledge and Simulation to Play Poker. In Proceedings of AAAI-99 (Sixteenth National Conference of the Association for Artificial Intelligence).
7. Chellapilla, K. and Fogel, D. B. 2000. Anaconda Defeats Hoyle 6-0: A Case Study Competing an Evolved Checkers Program against Commercially Available Software. In Proceedings of Congress on Evolutionary Computation, July 16-19 2000, La Jolla Marriot Hotel, La Jolla, California, USA, pp 857-863
8. Findler N. 1977. Studies in machine cognition using the game of poker. Communications of the ACM, 20(4):230-245.
9. Fogel D. 2001. Blondie24: Playing at the Edge of AI, Morgan Kaufmann, ISBN 1-55860-783-8
10. Hamilton, S., Garber, L. 1997. Deep Blue’s Hardware-Software Synergy. IEEE, pp 29-35
11. Kendall, G and Whitwell, G. 2001. An Evolutionary Approach for the Tuning of a Chess Evaluation Function using Population Dynamics. In proceedings of Congress of Evolutionary Computation 2001 (CEC 2001), May 27-30 2001, COEX, Seoul, Korea, pp 995-1002.
12. Koller, D. and Pfeffer, A. 1997. Representations and Solutions for Game-Theoritic Problems. Artificial Intelligence 94(1-2), pp 167-215
13. von Neumann, J and Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of Gamesand Economic Behavior. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
14. Samuel A. L. 1959. Some Studies in Machine Learning using the Game of Checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 3(3), pp 210-229
15. Samuel A. L. 2000. Some Studies in Machine Learning using the Game of Checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vol. 44 No. 1/2 January/March, pp 207-226
16. Schaeffer, J. 1996. One Jump Ahead: Challenging Human Supremacy in Checkers, Springer, Berlin
17. Schaeffer, J., Billings, D., Peňa, L P. and Szafron, D. 1999. Learning to Play Strong Poker. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-99) (invited paper)
18. Sklansky, D. 1994. Theory of Poker. Two Plus Two Publishing, ISBN 1-880685-00-0
19. Sklansky, D. 1996. Hold'em Poker. Two Plus Two Publishing, ISBN 1-880685-08-6