Population genomics and phylogeography of an Australian dairy factory derived lytic bacteriophage

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 382-393

  Castro Nallar, Eduardo ^a   Chen, Honglei ^b,c   Gladman, Simon ^c   Moore, Sean C ^c   Seemann, Torsten ^d   Powell, Ian B ^b   Hillier, Alan ^c   Crandall, Keith A ^a   Chandr, P Scott ^c  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Dairy Innovation Australia   (Australia)

^c CSIRO   (Australia)

^d MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bacteriophage; Phylodynamics; Population genomics; Pyrosequencing; Selection

Indexed keywords

LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS;

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BACTERIOPHAGE; CLASSIFICATION; DAIRY PRODUCT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; METAGENOMICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; VIROLOGY;

AUSTRALIA; BACTERIOPHAGES; DAIRY PRODUCTS; GENETIC VARIATION; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; METAGENOMICS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84863217464     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evs017     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 19:716-723.
2. Bennett SN, et al. 2010. Epidemic dynamics revealed in dengue evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 27:811-818.
3. Boucher I, Emond E, Dion E, Montpetit D, Moineau S. 2000. Microbiological and molecular impacts of Abik on the lytic cycle of Lactococcus lactis phages of the 936 and P335 species. Microbiology 146:445-453.
4. Brussow H, Canchaya C, Hardt W. 2004. Phages and the evolution of bacterial pathogens: from genomic rearrangements to lysogenic conversion. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 68:560-602.
5. Casjens SR. 2005. Comparative genomics and evolution of the tailedbacteriophages. Curr Opin Microbiol. 8:451-458.
6. Chopin M, Chopin A, Bidnenko E. 2005. Phage abortive infection in lactococci: variations on a theme. Curr Opin Microbiol. 8:473-479.
7. Crutz-Le Coq A, Cesselin B, Commissaire J, Anba J. 2002. Sequence analysis of the lactococcal bacteriophage biL170: insights into structural proteins and Hnh endonucleases in dairy phages. Microbiology 148:985-1001.
8. de Fabrizio SV, Ledford RA, Shieh YSC, Brown J, Parada JL. 1991. Comparison of lactococcal bacteriophage isolated in the United States and Argentina. Int J Food Microbiol. 13:285-293.
9. De Haard HJW, et al. 2005. Llama antibodies against a lactococcal protein located at the tip of the phage tail prevent phage infection. J Bacteriol. 187:4531-4541.
10. Delport W, Poon AFY, Frost SDW, Kosakovsky Pond SL. 2010. Datamonkey 2010: a suite of phylogenetic analysis tools for evolutionary biology. Bioinformatics 26:2455-2457.
11. Deveau H, Labrie SJ, Chopin M, Moineau S. 2006. Biodiversity and classification of lactococcal phages. Appl Environ Microbiol. 72:4338-4346.
12. Drummond AJ, Ho S, Phillips M, Rambaut A. 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 4:e88.
13. Drummond AJ, Nicholls G, Rodrigo A, Solomon W. 2002. Estimating mutation parameters, population history and genealogy simultaneously from temporally spaced sequence data. Genetics 161:1307-1320.
14. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. Beast: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 7:214.
15. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A, Shapiro B, Pybus O. 2005. Bayesian coalescent inference of past population dynamics from molecular sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1185-1192.
16. Dupont K, Vogensen FK, Neve H, Bresciani J, Josephsen J. 2004. Identification of the receptor-binding protein in 936-species lactococcal bacteriophages. Appl Environ Microbiol. 70:5818-5824.
17. Egan AN, Crandall KA. 2008. Incorporating gaps as phylogenetic characters across eight DNA regions: ramifications for North American Psoraleeae (Leguminosae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 46:532-546.
18. Fortier L, Bransi A, Moineau S. 2006. Genome sequence and global gene expression of Q54, a new phage species linking the 936 and C2 phage species of Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 188:6101-6114.
19. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2010. Seaview version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol. 27:221-224.
20. Hejnowicz MS, Golebiewski M, Bardowski J. 2009. Analysis of the complete genome sequence of the lactococcal bacteriophage biBB29. Int J Food Microbiol. 131:52-61.
21. Heled J, Drummond AJ. 2008. Bayesian inference of population size history from multiple loci. BMC Evol Biol. 8:289.
22. Hendrix RW. 2003. Bacteriophage genomics. Curr Opin Microbiol. 6:506-511.
23. Holmes EC. 2009. The evolutionary genetics of emerging viruses. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 40:353-372.
24. Hudson RR. 2001. Two-locus sampling distributions and their application. Genetics 159:1805-1817.
25. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. 2005. Mafft version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:511-518.
26. Kendall MG. 1938. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30:81-93.
27. Kosakovsky Pond SL, Frost SDW. 2005. A genetic algorithm approach to detecting lineage-specific variation in selection pressure. Mol Biol Evol. 22:478-485.
28. Ledeboer AM, et al. 2002. Preventing phage lysis of Lactococcus lactis in cheese production using a neutralizing heavy-chain antibody fragment from llama. J Dairy Sci. 85:1376-1382.
29. Lemey P, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Suchard MA. 2009. Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots. PLoS Comput Biol. 5:e1000520.
30. Librado P, Rozas J. 2009. Dnasp V5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451-1452.
31. Madera C, Monjardin C, Suarez JE. 2004. Milk contamination and resistance to processing conditions determine the fate of Lactococcus lactis bacteriophages in dairies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 70:7365-7371.
32. McVean G, Awadalla P, Fearnhead P. 2002. A coalescent-based method for detecting and estimating recombination from gene sequences. Genetics 160:1231-1241.
33. Pérez-Losada M, Viscidi RP, Demma JC, Zenilman J, Crandall KA. 2005. Population genetics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in a high-prevalence community using a hypervariable outer membrane porB and 13 slowly evolving housekeeping genes. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1887-1902.
34. Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1253-1256.
35. Pybus OG, Rambaut A. 2009. Evolutionary analysis of the dynamics of viral infectious disease. Nat Rev Genet. 10:540-550.
36. Rousseau GM, Moineau S. 2009. Evolution of Lactococcus lactis phages within a cheese factory. Appl Environ Microbiol. 75:5336-5344.
37. Sharp PM. 1997. In search of molecular Darwinism. Nature 385:111-112.
38. Spinelli S, et al. 2005. Lactococcal bacteriophage P2 receptor-binding protein structure suggests a common ancestor gene with bacterial and mammalian viruses. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 13:85-89.
39. Suárez V, Moineau S, Reinheimer J, Quiberoni A. 2008. Argentinean Lactococcus lactis bacteriophages: genetic characterization and adsorption studies. J Appl Microbiol. 104:371-379.
40. Tazi L, et al. 2010. Population dynamics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Shanghai, China: a comparative study. BMC Infect Dis. 10:13.
41. Tcherepanov V, Ehlers A, Upton C. 2006. Genome annotation transfer utility (GATU): rapid annotation of viral genomes using a closely related reference genome. BMC Genomics. 7:150.
42. Tremblay DM, et al. 2006. Receptor-binding protein of Lactococcus lactis phages: identification and characterization of the saccharide receptor-binding site. J Bacteriol. 188:2400-2410.
43. Watterson GA. 1975. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 7:256-276.