Utility and limitations of PHQ-9 in a clinic specializing in psychiatric care

BMC Psychiatry

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Inoue, Takeshi ^a   Tanaka, Teruaki ^a   Nakagawa, Shin ^a   Nakato, Yasuya ^a   Kameyama, Rie ^a   Boku, Shuken ^a   Toda, Hiroyuki ^a   Kurita, Tsugiko ^a   Koyama, Tsukasa ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DSM-IV-TR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; PATIENT HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE 9; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PSYCHIATRIST; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; ADOLESCENT; AGED; BIPOLAR DISORDER; COMORBIDITY; MENTAL DISEASE; MOOD DISORDER; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RELIABILITY; SELF REPORT; VALIDITY; VERY ELDERLY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84863206373     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1471244X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-73     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, . PHQ Primary Care Study Group Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. JAMA 1999, 282:1737-1744. 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737, 10568646, PHQ Primary Care Study Group.
2. Furukawa TA. Assessment of mood: guides for clinicians. J Psychosom Res 2010, 68:581-589. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.05.003, 20488276.
3. Gilbody S, Richards D, Brealey S, Hewitt C. Screening for depression in medical settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): a diagnostic meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2007, 22:1596-1602. 10.1007/s11606-007-0333-y, 2219806, 17874169.
4. Wittkampf KA, Naeije L, Schene AH, Huyser J, van Weert HC. Diagnostic accuracy of the mood module of the Patient Health Questionnaire: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2007, 29:388-395. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.06.004, 17888804.
5. Löwe B, Unützer J, Callahan CM, Perkins AJ, Kroenke K. Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the patient health questionnaire-9. Med Care 2004, 42:1194-1201. 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00006, 15550799.
6. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001, 16:606-613. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x, 1495268, 11556941.
7. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR 2000, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, 4, American Psychiatric Association.
8. Muramatsu K, Miyaoka H, Kamijima K, Muramatsu Y, Yoshida M, Otsubo T, Gejyo F. The patient health questionnaire, Japanese version: validity according to the mini-international neuropsychiatric interview-plus. Psychol Rep 2007, 101:952-960.
9. Montgomery SA, Åsberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979, 134:382-389. 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382, 444788.
10. Williams JB. A structured interview guide for the Hamilton depression rating scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988, 45:742-747. 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320058007, 3395203.
11. Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr 2007, 96:644-647. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00178.x, 17376185.
12. Perlis RH, Brown E, Baker RW, Nierenberg AA. Clinical features of bipolar depression versus major depressive disorder in large multicenter trials. Am J Psychiatry 2006, 163:225-231. 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.2.225, 16449475.
13. Wittkampf K, van Ravesteijn H, Baas K, van de Hoogen H, Schene A, Bindels P, Lucassen P, van de Lisdonk E, van Weert H. The accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in detecting depression and measuring depression severity in high-risk groups in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2009, 31:451-459. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.06.001, 19703639.
14. Carmody TJ, Rush AJ, Bernstein I, Warden D, Brannan S, Burnham D, Woo A, Trivedi MH. The Montgomery Asberg and the Hamilton ratings of depression: a comparison of measures. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2006, 16:601-611. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.04.008, 2151980, 16769204.