Feasible optical weak measurements of complementary observables via a single hamiltonian

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 108, Issue 8, 2012, Pages

  Wu, Shengjun ^a   Aukowski, Marek ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GDA SK   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INITIAL STATE; NONLINEAR CRYSTALS; PARAMETRIC DOWN-CONVERSION; SIGNAL TO NOISE; THREE WAVE MIXING; WEAK MEASUREMENTS; WEAK VALUES;

ATOMIC PHYSICS; PHYSICS;

MEASUREMENTS;

EID: 84863182387     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.080403     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Y. Aharonov, D.Z. Albert, and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1351
2. N.W.M. Ritchie, J.G. Story, and R.G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1107 (1991). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1107
3. G.J. Pryde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 220405 (2005). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.220405 (Pubitemid 41636596)
4. O. Hosten and P. Kwiat, Science 319, 787 (2008). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1152697 (Pubitemid 351225863)
5. Y. Aharonov, Phys. Lett. A 301, 130 (2002). PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00986-6
6. H.M. Wiseman, New J. Phys. NJOPFM 1367-2630 9, 165 (2007). 10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/165 (Pubitemid 46950633)
7. R. Mir, New J. Phys. 9, 287 (2007). NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/9/ 8/287 (Pubitemid 47340153)
8. N.S. Williams and A.N. Jordan, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 100, 026804 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.026804
9. L.M. Johansen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 120402 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.120402
10. O. Hosten and P. Kwiat, Science 319, 787 (2008). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1152697 (Pubitemid 351225863)
11. K.J. Resch, Science 319, 733 (2008). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1154149 (Pubitemid 351225857)
12. P.B. Dixon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 173601 (2009). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.173601
13. D.J. Starling, Phys. Rev. A 80, 041803(R) (2009). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.041803
14. N. Brunner and C. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 010405 (2010). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.010405
15. J.S. Lundeen, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 474, 188 (2011). 10.1038/nature10120
16. O. Zilberberg, A. Romito, and Y. Gefen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 080405 (2011). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.080405
17. A. Feizpour, X. Xing, and A.M. Steinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 133603 (2011). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.133603
18. J.-W. Pan, Rev. Mod. Phys. (to be published); RMPHAT 0034-6861
19. J.-W. Pan arXiv:0805.2853.
20. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. A 84, 052111 (2011). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.052111
21. S. Wu and Y. Li, Phys. Rev. A 83, 052106 (2011). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.052106
22. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.108.080403 for a discussion on weak measurements with imperfect pre- and postselection.
23. G.S. Agarwal and P.K. Pathak, Phys. Rev. A 75, 032108 (2007). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032108 (Pubitemid 46418244)