The performance analysis of ARM NEON technology for mobile platforms

Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Research in Applied Computation Symposium, RACS 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 104-106

  Jang, Minwoo ^a   Kim, Kukhyun ^a   Kim, Kanghee ^a  

^a Soongsil University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

ARM cortex A8; embedded system; mobile platform; NEON technology; SIMD

Indexed keywords

3D GRAPHICS; ARM CORTEX-A8; ARM PROCESSOR; COMPUTING POWER; EVALUATION CRITERIA; EXECUTION TIME; MEDIA PROCESSING; MOBILE PLATFORM; OPEN-SOURCE; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; PROGRAM CODE; SIMD; SINGLE INSTRUCTION MULTIPLE DATA; VECTOR OPERATIONS;

EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; MOBILE PHONES;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84863178491     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2103380.2103401     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Bowman, M., Debray, S. K., and Peterson, L. L. 1993. Reasoning about naming systems. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 15, 5 (Nov. 1993), 795-825. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/161468.161471.
2. Fröhlich, B. and Plate, J. 2000. The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands, April 01 - 06, 2000). CHI '00. ACM Press, New York, NY, 526-531. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/ 332040.332491
3. Ding, W. and Marchionini, G. 1997 A Study on Video Browsing Strategies. Technical Report. University of Maryland at College Park.
4. Sannella, M. J. 1994 Constraint Satisfaction and Debugging for Interactive User Interfaces. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: UMI Order No. GAX95-09398., University of Washington.
5. Forman, G. 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003), 1289-1305.