Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment for choledocholithiasis: A meta-analysis

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 464-471

  Liu, Yangyang ^a   Su, Peizhu ^a   Lin, Siheng ^a   Xiao, Kun ^a   Chen, Pingyan ^b   An, Shengli ^b   Zhi, Fachao ^a   Bai, Yang ^a  

^a FIRST MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Nanfang Medical University   (China)

Author keywords

Balloon dilation; Choledocholithiasis; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Endoscopic sphincterotomy; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BALLOON DILATATION; BILE DUCT BASKET IMPACTION; BILE DUCT INJURY; BILIARY TRACT HEMORRHAGE; CHOLANGITIS; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; ENDOSCOPIC MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPSY; ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLARY BALLOON DILATATION; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LITHOTRIPSY; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREATITIS; PATIENT SAFETY; PERFORATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT DISEASE;

EID: 84863164641     PISSN: 08159319     EISSN: 14401746     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06912.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Yasuda I. Management of the bile duct stone: current situation in Japan. Dig. Endosc. 2010; 22: S76-8.
2. Staritz M, Ewe K, Meyer ZBK. Endoscopic papillary dilation (EPD) for the treatment of common bile duct stones and papillary stenosis. Endoscopy 1983; 15 (Suppl. 1): 197-8.
3. May GR, Cotton PB, Edmunds SE etal. Removal of stones from the bile duct at ERCP without sphincterotomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1993; 39: 749-54.
4. Katanuma A, Maguchi H, Osanai M etal. Complications and risk management of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation. Dig. Endosc. 2007; 19: S68-71.
5. Weinberg BM, Shindy W, Lo S. Endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2006; (4): D4890.
6. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D etal. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control. Clin. Trials 1996; 17: 1-12.
7. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ etal. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyzes. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-60.
8. Lijmer JG, Bossuyt PMM, Heisterkamp SH. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. Stat. Med. 2002; 21: 1525-37.
9. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 1959; 22: 719-48.
10. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials 1986; 7: 177-88.
11. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 (Updated February 2008) [Document on the Internet]. The Cochrane Library. Issue 2, Chichester, UK: John Wiley&Sons Ltd, 2008. Cited Apr 2008. Available from URL:
12. Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J etal. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 1985; 27: 335-71.
13. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50: 1088-101.
14. Watanabe H, Yoneda M, Tominaga K etal. Comparison between endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones. J. Gastroenterol. 2007; 42: 56-62.
15. Lin CK, Lai KH, Chan HH etal. Endoscopic balloon dilatation is a safe method in the management of common bile duct stones. Dig. Liver Dis. 2004; 36: 68-72.
16. Tanaka S, Sawayama T, Yoshioka T. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term outcomes in a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004; 59: 614-18.
17. Disario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ etal. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 1291-9.
18. Vlavianos P, Chopra K, Mandalia S etal. Endoscopic balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for the removal of bile duct stones: a prospective randomised trial. Gut 2003; 52: 1165-9.
19. Natsui M, Narisawa R, Motoyama H etal. What is an appropriate indication for endoscopic papillary balloon dilation? Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2002; 14: 635-40.
20. Bergman JJ, van Berkel AM, Bruno MJ etal. Is endoscopic balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones associated with an increased risk for pancreatitis or a higher rate of hyperamylasemia? Endoscopy 2001; 33: 416-20.
21. Bergman JJ, van Berkel AM, Bruno MJ etal. A randomized trial of endoscopic balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones in patients with a prior Billroth II gastrectomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001; 53: 19-26.
22. Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y etal. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003; 57: 151-5.
23. Arnold JC, Benz C, Martin WR etal. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation vs. sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized pilot study. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 563-7.
24. Igarashi Y, Yasuda I. Risk management for endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones: endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. Dig. Endosc. 2007; 19: 40-3.
25. Park DH, Kim M, Lee SK etal. Endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for choledocholithiasis in liver cirrhosis with coagulopathy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004; 60: 181-5.
26. Kojima Y, Nakagawa H, Miyata A etal. Long-term prognosis of bile duct stones: endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy. Dig. Endosc. 2010; 22: 21-4.
27. Liao WC, Huang SP, Wu MS etal. Comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and sphincterotomy for lithotripsy in difficult sphincterotomy. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2008; 42: 295-9.
28. Toda N, Saito K, Wada R etal. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005; 52: 700-4.
29. Attila T, May GR, Kortan P. Nonsurgical management of an impacted mechanical lithotriptor with fractured traction wires: endoscopic intracorporeal electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy followed by extra-endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 2008; 22: 699-702.
30. Fujita R, Yamamura M, Fujita Y. Combined endoscopic sphincterotomy and percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1988; 34: 91-4.
31. Tsujino T, Kawabe T, Isayama H etal. Efficacy and safety of low-pressured and short-time dilation in endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone removal. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008; 23: 867-71.
32. Tsujino T, Isayama H, Komatsu Y etal. Risk factors for pancreatitis in patients with common bile duct stones managed by endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2005; 100: 38-42.
33. Nakagawa H, Ohara K. Safeguards against acute pancreatitis associated with endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation. J. Hepatobiliary. Pancreat. Surg. 2006; 13: 75-9.
34. Bergman JJ, van der Mey S, Rauws EA etal. Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60years of age. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1996; 44: 643-9.
35. Bergman JJ, van Berkel AM, Groen AK etal. Biliary manometry, bacterial characteristics, bile composition, and histologic changes fifteen to seventeen years after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1997; 45: 400-5.
36. Rolny P, Andren-Sandberg A, Falk A. Recurrent pancreatitis as a late complication of endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: diagnosis and therapy. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 356-9.