A new methodology for determining irrigation schedule of grapevines using photogrammetric measurement of berry diameter

Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 582-587

  Zhang, Qing Tao ^a,c   Wang, Shi Ping ^b,c   Inoue, Mitsuhiro ^c   Moritani, Shigeoki ^c   Tsuji, Wataru ^c   Geng, Shu ^a   Qiu, Guo Yu ^a   Xie, Qiang ^b  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c TOTTORI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Berry development stage 1; Berry diameter; Drylands; Irrigation schedule; Photogrammetry; Photosynthesis; Soil moisture; Soil water potential threshold; Transpiration; Vitis vinifera; Water stress

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BERRY; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; EVAPORATION; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FLOWERING; FRUIT MORPHOLOGY; FRUIT SIZE; GRAPE; IRRIGATION (AGRICULTURE); NONHUMAN; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT GROWTH; SOIL DEPTH; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL WATER CONTENT; SOIL WATER POTENTIAL; WATER DEFICIT; WATER STRESS;

PIONE; VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 84863160140     PISSN: 14590255     EISSN: 14590263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Qadir, M., Sharma, B. R., Bruggeman, A., Choukr-Allah, R. and Karajeh, F. 2007. Non-conventional water resources and opportunities for water augmentation to achieve food security in water scarce countries. Agric. Water Mgt. 87:2-22.
2. Jones, H. G. and Tardieu, F. 1998. Modelling water relations of horticultural crops: A review. Scientia Hort. 74:21-46.
3. Poni, S., Bernizzoni, F., Civardi, S., Gatti, M., Porro, D. and Camin, F. 2009. Performance and water-use efficiency (single-leaf vs. whole- canopy) of well-watered and half-stressed split-root Lambrusco grapevines grown in Po Valley (Italy). Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 129:97-106.
4. Lovisolo, C. and Schubert, A. 2006. Mercury hinders recovery of shoot hydraulic conductivity during grapevine rehydration: Evidence from a whole-plant approach. New Phytol. 172:469-478.
5. Lovisolo, C., Perrone, I., Hartung, W. and Schubert, A. 2008. An abscisic acid-related reduced transpiration promotes gradual embolism repair when grapevines are rehydrated after drought. New Phytol. 180:642-651.
6. Shani, U., Waisel, Y., Eshel, A., Xue, S. and Ziv, G. 1993. Responses to salinity of grapevines plants with split root systems. New Phytol. 124:695-701.
7. Williams, L. E., Grimes, D. W. and Phene, C. J. 2010. The effects of applied water amounts at various fractions of measured grapevine evapotranspiration (ETc) on phenology, water relations and vegetative growth of Thompson seedless grapevines. Irr. Sci. 28:221-232.
8. Fereres, E., Goldhamer, D. A. and Parsons, L. R. 2003. Irrigation water management of horticultural crops. HortSci. 38:1036-1042.
9. Ton, Y., Kopyt, M., Zachs, I. and Ben-Ner, Z. 2004. Phytomonitoring technique for tuning irrigation of fruit trees. Acta Hort. 646:127-132.
10. Fereres, E., Goldhamer, D., Cohen, M., Girona, J. and Mata, M. 1999. Continuous trunk diameter recording can reveal water stress in peach trees. California Agr. 53:21-25.
11. Goldhamer, D. and Fereres, E. 2004. Irrigation scheduling of almond trees with trunk diameter sensors. Irr. Sci. 23:11-19.
12. Selles, G. and Berger, A. 1990. Physiological indicators of plant water status as criteria for irrigation scheduling. Acta Hort. 278:87-100.
13. Avidan, A., Hazan, A., Kopyt, M. and Ton, Y. 2005. Application of the phytomonitoring technique for table grapes. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Advances in Grapevine and Wine Research. Venosa, Italy, pp. 15-17.
14. Gratacos, E. and Gurovitch, L. 2003. Phytomonitoring in kiwifruit orchards as a plant water status indicator and its use in irrigation scheduling. Cien. Inv. Agr. 30:113-137.
15. Kopyt, M., Ton, Y. and Tsadok, S. 2005. Chardonnay trunk diameter growth and microvariations: Four-year trial results and outlook for irrigation control. The Austral. and N. Z. Grapegrower and Winemaker 493:23-25.
16. Ton, Y., Kopyt, M. and Nilov, N. 2004. Phytomonitoring technique for tuning irrigation of vineyards. Acta Hort. 646:133-139.
17. Ton, Y. and Kopyt, M. 2004. Phytomonitoring in realization of irrigation strategies for wine grapes. Acta Hort. 652:167-173.
18. Intrigliolo, D. S. and Castel, J. R. 2007. Evaluation of grapevine water status from trunk diameter variations. Irr. Sci. 26:49-59.
19. Imai, S., Iwao, K. and Fujiwara, T. 1991. Measurements of plant physiological information of vine tree and indexation of soil moisture control. 3. Influence of soil moisture on daily variation-characteristics of stem and fruit diameter of vine trees. Environ. Control in Biol. 29:19-26 (in Japanese, with English abstract).
20. Chatelet, D. S., Rost, T. L., Matthews, M. A. and Shackel, K. A. 2008. The peripheral xylem of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) berries. 2. Anatomy and development. J. Expt. Bot. 59:1997-2007.
21. Coombe, B. G. and McCarthy, M. G. 2000. Dynamics of grape berry growth and physiology of ripening. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 6:131-135.
22. Coombe, B. G. 1987. Distribution of solutes within the developing grape berry in relation to its morphology. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 38:120-127.
23. Prichard, T., Hanson, B., Schwankl, L., Verdegaal, P. and Smith, R. 2004. Deficit irrigation of quality winegrapes using micro-irrigation techniques. In Handbook of Univ. of California Cooperative Ext., San Joaquin County, USA.
24. 13C-photosynthate from spur leaves during fruit growth of three Japanese pear cultivars differing in maturation date. Ann. Bot. 95:685-693.
25. McCarthy, M. G. 2000. Developmental variation in sensitivity of Vitis vinifera L. (Shiraz) berries to soil water deficit. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 6:136-140.
26. McCarthy, M. G. 1997. The effect of transient water deficit on berry development of cv. Shiraz (Vitis vinifera L.). Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 3:102-108.
27. Konukcu, F., Gowing, J. W. and Rose, D. A. 2005. Dry drainage: A sustainable solution to water logging and salinity problems in irrigation areas? Agric. Water Manag. 83:1-12.
28. Bravdo, B., Hepner, Y., Loinger, C., Cohen, S. and Tabacman, H. 1985. Effect of irrigation and crop level on growth, yield and wine quality of Cabernet Sauvignon. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 36:132-139.
29. Esteban, M. A., Villanueva, M. J. and Lissarrague, J. R. 2001. Effect of irrigation on changes in the anthocyanin composition of the skin of cv. Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.) grape berries during ripening. J. Sci. Food Agric. 81:409-420.
30. Pellegrino, A., Lebon, E., Voltz, M. and Wery, J. 2004. Relationships between plant and soil water status in vine (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Soil 266:129-142.
31. Poni, S., Lakso, A. N., Turner, J. R. and Melious, R. E. 1994. Interactions of crop level and late season water stress on growth and physiology of field-grown Concord grapevines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 45:252-258.
32. Reynolds, A. G., Lowrey, W. D. and Savigny, C. D. 2005. Influence of irrigation and fertigation on fruit composition, vine performance, and water relations of Concord and Niagara grapevines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 56:110-128.
33. Imai, S., Fujiwara, T., Tanaka, S. and Okamoto, G. 1991. Effect of soil moisture on vine growth and fruit production of Kyoho grapes growing on restricted rooting volume. Environ. Control in Biol. 29:133-140 (in Japanese, with English abstract).
34. Moritani, S., Yamamoto, T., Henintsoa, A. and Muraki, H. 2006. Monitoring of soil erosion using digital camera under simulated rainfall. Trans. of JSIDRE 244:143-149 (in Japanese, with English abstract).
35. Moritani, S., Yamamoto, T., Henintsoa, A. and Muraki, H. 2007. Monitoring of soil erosion using digital camera under simulated rainfall. Fall Meeting of Amer. Geophysical Union.
36. Pyle, C. J. and Richards, K. S. 1997. Digital photogrammetric monitoring of river bank erosion. Photogramm. Rec. 15:753-764.
37. Thippayarugs, S., Suzuki, K., Katsuta, Y., Yoshida, A., Matsumoto, N., Kabaki, N. and Wongwiwatchai, C. 2002. Vegetable production using energy-saving hydroponic system in Khon Kaen. JIRCAS Working Report 30:161-165.
38. Wang, S. P., Okamoto, G., Hirano, K., Lu, J. and Zhang, C. X. 2001. Effects of restricted rooting volume on vine growth and berry development of Kyoho grapevines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 52:248-253.
39. Marthaler, H. P., Vogelsanger, W., Richard, F. and Wierenga, P. J. 1983. A pressure transducer for field tensiometers. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47:624-627.
40. rd edn. Prentice-Hall International Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
41. Moran, M. S., Scott, R. L., Keefer, T. O., Emmerich, W. E., Hernández, M., Nearing, G. S., Paige, G. B., Cosh, M. H. and O'Neill, P. E. 2009. Partitioning evapotranspiration in semiarid grassland and shrubland ecosystems using time series of soil surface temperature. Agric. For. Meteorol. 149:59-72.
42. Coombe, B. G. and Bishop, G. R. 1980. Development of the grape berry. II. Changes in diameter and deformability during veraison. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 31:499-509.
43. Greenspan, M. D., Shackel, K. A. and Matthews, M. A. 1994. Developmental changes in the diurnal water budget of the grape berry exposed to water deficits. Plant Cell Environ. 17:811-820.
44. Resco, V., Ewers, B. E., Sun, W., Huxman, T. E., Weltzin, J. F. and Williams, D. G. 2009. Drought-induced hydraulic limitations constrain leaf gas exchange recovery after precipitation pulses in the C3 woody legume, Prosopis velutina. New Phytol. 181:672-682.
45. Santesteban, L. G. and Royo, J. B. 2006. Water status, leaf area and fruit load influence on berry weight and sugar accumulation of cv. Tempranillo under semiarid conditions. Scientia Hort. 109:60-65.
46. Bota, J., Flexas, J. and Medrano, H. 2004. Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress? New Phytol. 162:671-681.
47. Epron, D. and Dreyer, E. 1992. Effects of severe dehydration on leaf photosynthesis in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.: Photosystem II efficiency, photochemical and non-photochemical fluorescence quenching and electrolyte leakage. Tree Physiol. 10:273-284.
48. Sousa, T. A., Oliveira, M. T. and Pereira, J. M. 2005. Physiological indicators of plant water status of irrigated and non-irrigated grapevines grown in a low rainfall area of Portugal. Plant Soil 282:127-134.