Minimally invasive versus conventional dynamic hip screw for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in older patients

Orthopedics

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Zhou, Zhiping ^a   Zhang, Xingxiang ^a   Tian, Shoujin ^a   Wu, Yaogang ^a  

^a Zhangjiagang First Pepole's Hospital   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; DATA ANALYSIS; ELDERLY CARE; FEMUR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOBILIZATION; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

BONE SCREWS; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; PREVALENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84863145502     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120123-42     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kyle RF, Gustilo RB, Premer RF. Analysis of six hundred and twenty-two intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979; 61(2):216-221.
2. Alobaid A, Harvey EJ, Elder GM, Lander P, Guy P, Reindl R. Minimally invasive dynamic hip screw: prospective randomized trial of two techniques of insertion of a standard dynamic fixation device. J Orthop Trauma. 2004; 18(4):207-212. (Pubitemid 38578784)
3. Morris AH, Zuckerman JD, AAOS Council of Health Policy and Practice, USA. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. National Consensus Conference on improving the continuum of care for patients with hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(4):670- 674.
4. Browner BD, Alberta FG, Mastella DJ. A new era in orthopedic trauma care. Surg Clin North Am. 1999; 79(6):1431-1448.
5. Ho M, Garau G, Walley G, et al. Minimally invasive dynamic hip screw for fixation of hip fractures [published online ahead of print May 14, 2008]. Int Orthop. 2009; 33(2):555-560.
6. Wong TC, Chiu Y, Tsang WL, Leung WY, Yeung SH. A double-blind, prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial of minimally invasive dynamic hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. Injury. 2009; 40(4):422-427.
7. Lee YS, Huang HL, Lo TY, Huang CR. Dynamic hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: a comparison of two fixation methods [published online ahead of print October 12, 2006]. Int Orthop. 2007; 31(5):683-688.
8. Wang JP, Yang TF, Kong QQ, et al. Minimally invasive technique versus conventional technique of dynamic hip screws for intertrochanteric femoral fractures [published online ahead of print October 10, 2009]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010; 130(5):613-620.
9. Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet. 2001; 358(9285):870-875. (Pubitemid 32900568)
10. Panesar SS, Mirza S, Bharadwaj G, Woolf V, Ravikumar R, Athanasiou T. The percutaneous compression plate versus the dynamic hip screw: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008; 74(1):38-48.
11. Bolhofner BR, Russo PR, Carmen B. Results of intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with a 135-degree sliding screw with a twohole side plate. J Orthop Trauma. 1999; 13(1):5-8. (Pubitemid 128701894)
12. McLoughlin SW, Wheeler DL, Rider J, Bolhofner B. Biomechanical evaluation of the dynamic hip screw with two- and fourhole side plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2000; 14(5):318-323.
13. Lyons AR. Clinical outcomes and treatment of hip fractures. Am J Med. 1997; 103(2A):51S-63S.
14. Jones HW, Johnston P, Parker M. Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3,279 fractures [published online ahead of print February 22, 2006]. Int Orthop. 2006; 30(2):69-78.
15. Hardy DC, Descamps PY, Krallis P, et al. Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80(5):618-630.
16. Shah MR, Aharonoff GB, Wolinsky P, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ. Outcome after hip fracture in individuals ninety years of age and older. J Orthop Trauma. 2001; 15(1):34-39. (Pubitemid 33602163)
17. Hoeksma HL, Van Den Ende CH, Ronday HK, Heering A, Breedveld FC. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003; 62(10):935-938. (Pubitemid 37159490)
18. Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48(1):167-171.
19. Bailar JC III. The promise and problems of meta-analysis. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(8):559-561.