Phytomonitoring in realization of irrigation strategies for wine grapes

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 652, Issue , 2004, Pages 167-173

  Ton, Y ^a   Kopyt, M ^a  

^a PhyTech LTD   (Israel)

Author keywords

Grape quality; Irrigation control; Sensors; Vineyards

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863130433     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.652.20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Archer, P., Cohen, M., Ameglio, T., Valancogne, C. and Anton, A. 2001. Trunk diameter variations in relation to walnut water potential. Acta Hort. 562: 47-53.
2. Dry, P.R., Loveys, B.R., McCarthy, M.G. and Stoll, M. 2001. Strategic irrigation management in Australian vineyards. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin. 35(3): 129-139.
3. Goldhamer, D., Fereres, E., Cohen, M., Girona, J. and Mata, M. 2000. Comparison of continuous and discrete plant-based monitoring for detecting tree water deficits and barriers to grower adoption for irrigation management. Acta Hort. 537: 431-445.
4. Goldhamer, D.A. and Ferefes, E. 2001. Irrigation scheduling protocols using continuously recorded trunk diameter measurements. Irrigation Science. 20:115-125.
5. Huguet, J.G., Li, S.H., Lorendeau, J.Y and Pelloux, G. 1992. Specific micromorphometric reactions of fruit trees to water stress and irrigation scheduling automation. Journal of Horticultural Science. 67:631-640.
6. Jackson, D. and Lombard, P. 1993. Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 44: 409-430.
7. Matthews, M.A., Anderson, M.M. and Schultz, H.R. 1987. Phenologic and growth responses to early and late season water deficits in Cabernet franc. Vitis. 26:147-160.
8. McCarthy, M. G., 1993. Deficit irrigation experiment bearing results. The Australian Grapegrower and Winemaker. 359: 75-77.
9. Michelakis, N. 1997. Daily stem radius variations as indicators to optimize olive tree irrigation scheduling. Acta Horticulturae. 449: 297-304.
10. Nadal, M. and Arola, L. 1995. Effects of limited irrigation on the composition of must and wine of Cabernet Sauvignon under semi-arid conditions. Vitis. 34: 151-154.
11. Naor, A., Bravdo, B. and Hepner, Y. 1993. Effect of post-veraison irrigation level on Sauvignon blank yield, juice quality and water relations. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitis. 14: 19- 25.
12. Nilov, N.G. 1993. The main task of the phytomonitoring in viticulture. Vinogradarstvo i Vinodelie (rus.). 11: 19-25.
13. Smart, R.E. and Coombe, B.J. 1983. Water relations of grapevines. In: Kozlowski T.T.(ed) Water deficits and plant growth. VII: 137-196.
14. So, H.B. 1979. An analysis of the relationship between stem diameter and leaf water potentials. Agronomy Journal. 71: 675-679.
15. So, H.B., Reicosky, D.C. and Taylor, H.M. 1979. Utility of stem diameter changes as predictors of plant canopy water potential. Agronomy Journal. 71: 707-713.
16. Ton, Y. 1997. Phytomonitoring system. IV International congress on new agricultural technologies. Puerto Vallarta. Jalisco. Mexico: 89-95.
17. Ton, Y., Nilov, N. and Kopyt, M. 2001. Phytomonitoring: the new information technology for improving crop production. Acta Hort. 562: 257-262.
18. Ton, Y., Kopyt, M., Zachs, I. and Ben-Ner, Z. 2002. Phytomonitoring technique for tuning irrigation of fruit trees. International water and irrigation. 22. No 4: 48 - 49.
19. Ton, Y., Kopyt, M. and Nilov, N. 2004. Phytomonitoring technique for tuning irrigation of vineyards. Acta Hort. 646: 133-139.
20. Van Leeuwen, C., Chone, X., Tregoat, O. and Gaudillere, J-P. 2001. The use of physiological indicators to assess vine water uptake and to manage vineyard irrigation. The Australian Grapegrower and Winemaker. 449: 18-24.
21. Winkler, A.J., Cook, J.A., Kliewer, W.M and Lider, L.A. 1994. General Viticulture. Second edition. California. The University of California Press. 710p.