External costs as driving forces of land use changes

Sustainability

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1035-1054

  Loehr, Dirk ^a  

^a TRIER UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Financial equalization scheme; Land use changes; Planning; Property tax

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863113064     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su2041035     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. German Federal Parliament (Deutscher Bundestag). Große Anfrage-Instrumente zur Reduzierung des Flächenverbrauchs; Printed matter Inc.: Berlin, Germany, 2007; Available online: http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/16/073/1607360.pdf (accessed on 6 April 2010).
2. Federal Environment Agency Germany (Umweltbundesamt). Towards More Effective and Sustainable Brownfield Revitalization Policies. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Managing Urban Land, Stuttgart, Germany, 25-27 April 2007.
3. Ding, C. Farmland Preservation in China. Land Lines 2004, 16, No. 3; Available online: www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/913_Farmland-Preservation-in-China (accessed on 6 April 2010).
4. Jiang, X.; Zhao, W.; Ma, S. Don't move my food-Chinese netizens rebuke economist's attack on farm land bottom line. China View, 26 December 2008; Available online: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-12/26/content_10563842.htm (accessed on 6 April 2010).
5. Interview with Ralf Symann. DED Cambodia, 9 March 2010.
6. Economic Land Concessions in Cambodia-A Human Rights Perspective; United Nations Cambodia Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights: Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2007; Available online: http://cambodia.ohchr.org/webdocuments/reports/Thematic_rpt/Thematic%20Report%20on%20ELC_12-Jun-07_eng.pdf (accessed on 2 January 2010).
7. Economic Land Concession, Information Center; Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF): Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2009; Available online: http://www.elc.maff.gov.kh/index.html (accessed on 14 December 2009).
8. A Fair Share for Women: Cambodia. Gender Assessment; The World Bank: Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2004. p. 60.
9. Sharing Growth: Equity and Development in Cambodia-Equity Report 2007; The World Bank: Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2007; Available online: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/EASTASIAPACIFICEXT/CAMBODIAEXTN/0,contentMDK:21368241~pagePK:141137~piPK:141127~theSitePK:293856,00.html (accessed on 8 November 2009).
10. Cambodia: Halving Poverty by 2015?: Poverty Assessment; The World Bank: Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2006
11. A Fair Share for Women: Cambodia Gender Assessment; The World Bank, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2004; p
12. Hansen, K.; Top, N. Natural Forest Benefits and Economic Analysis of Natural Forest Conversion in Cambodia; Cambodia Development Research Institute (CDRI): Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2006.
13. Eswaran, H.; Lal, R.; Reich, P.F. Land degradation: An overview. In Responses to Land Degradation, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Land Degradation and Desertification, Khon Kaen, Thailand, 25-29 January, 1999; Bridges, E.M., Hannam, I.D., Oldeman, L.R., Pening de Vries, F.W.T., Scherr, S.J., Sompatpanit, S., Eds.; Oxford Press: New Delhi, India, 2001; Available online: http://soils.usda.gov/use/worldsoils/papers/land-degradation-overview.html (accessed on 14 December 2009).
14. Tan, R.; Beckmann, V.; van den Berg, L.; Qu, F. Governing farmland conversion: Comparing China with The Netherlands and Germany. Land Use Policy 2009, 26, 961-974.
15. Nash, J.F. Non-cooperative Games; Princeton University: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1950; Available online: http://www.princeton.edu/mudd/news/faq/topics/Non-Cooperative_Games_Nash.pdf (accessed on 17 December 2009).
16. Kung, J. Choice of land tenure in China: The case of country with quasi-private property rights. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 2002, 50, 793-817.
17. Cui, T. Research on the system of field property rights in the Chinese countryside. In Proceedings of ERSEC International Conference on Sustainable Land Use and Water Management, Beijing, China, 8-10 October 2009; UNESCO Office Beijing: Beijing, China, 2009; pp. 75-80.
18. Cambodia Economic Watch; Economic Institute of Cambodia: Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2008; Available online: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTCAMBODIA/Resources/Economic-Watch-October-2008.pdf (accessed on 14 December 2009).
19. Sub-Decree No. 72 ANK, BK on Commune/Sangkat Land Use Planning Procedure. In Implementation Manual on Commune Land Use Planning-To Support Commune Development Plan and Commune Investment Program; Ministry of Land Management, Urban Planning and Construction, Cambodia (MLMUPC): Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2009.
20. Project Appraisal Document-Land Allocation for Social and Economic Development Project; The World Bank: London, UK, 23 April 2008; Available online: http://web.worldbank.org/external/projects/main?menuPK=51447259&pagePK=51351007&piPK=64675967&theSitePK=40941&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=51351213&theSitePK=40941&entityID=000333037_20080506000231&searchMenuPK=51351213&theSitePK=40941 (accessed on 14 December 2009).
21. German Federal Parliament (Deutscher Bundestag). Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Große Anfrage (Bundesdrucksache 16/7360)-Instrumente zur Reduzierung des Flächenverbrauchs; Printed Matter Inc.: Berlin, Germany, 2008; pp. 1-28; Available online: http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/16/097/1609720.pdf (accessed on 6 April 2010).
22. Zou, X.; Oskam, A.J. New Compensation Standard for Land Expropriation in China. China World Econ. 2007, 15, 107-120.
23. Mongabey.com Homepage. http://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/2000/Cambodia.htm (accessed on 9 January 2010).
24. Holland, A.S.; Ott, S.H.; Riddiough, T.J. The role of uncertainty in investment: An examination of competing investment models using commercial real estate data. Real Estate Econ. 2000, 28, 33-64.
25. von Thünen, J.H. Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie, oder Untersuchungen über den Einfluß, den die Getreidepreise, der Reichtum des Bodens und die Abgaben auf den Ackerbau ausüben; Perthes: Hamburg, Germany, 1826.
26. Ricardo, D. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation; Liberty Fund: Allison Pointe Trail, IN, USA, 1817; reprint 2004.
27. Thiel, F. Public Land Leasing International-Intelligente Bodenpolitik oder Instrument zum "Land Grabbing"? In Jahrbuch für Bodenpolitik 2008/2009; Dieterich, H., Löhr, D., Thiel, F., Tomerius, S., Eds.; vwf-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2010, (in print).
28. Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC). The Fixation of Concession Land Rental Fee; Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF): Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 31 May 2000; Available online: http://www.elc.maff.gov.kh/index.html (accessed on 5 March 2010).
29. Deng, F.F. Political Economy of Public Land Leasing in Beijing. In Leasing Public Land-Policy Debates and International Experiences, China; Bourassa, S.C., Hong, Y.H., Eds.; Lincoln Institute of Land Policy: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003; pp. 229-250.
30. Rectangular Strategy, Phase II; Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC): Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2008
31. Cullis, J.; Jones, P. Public Finance and Public Choice, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998.
32. Bretschneider, B. Hoheitsrechtlich geplant? Architektur Bauforum 2008, 20, 1-2.
33. Beisinger, C.; Diao, X. Economic Transformation in Theory and Practise: What Are the Messages for Africa? Discussion Paper 00797; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Washington, DC, September 2008; Available online: www.ifpri.org/publication/economic-transformation-theory-and-practice (accessed on 16 April 2010).
34. Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, 2nd ed.; Harvard University Press: Harvard, CA, USA, 1971.
35. Siedlungsentwicklung und Infrastrukturfolgekosten-Bilanzierung und Strategieentwicklung; Final Report; Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning Germany (Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, BBR): Bonn,Germany, 2006
36. Global Corruption Barometer; Transparency International: Berlin, Germany, 2009; Available online: http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/gcb/2009. (accessed on 8 November 2009).
37. Schutz der biologischen Vielfalt und Schonung von Ressourcen-Warum wir mit Flächen sorgsam und intelligent umgehen müssen; Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt, UBA): Dessau, Germany, 2008
38. Sources: Statistisches Jahrbuch 2008; Statistisches Bundesamt: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2009; Zunahme der Siedlungs- und Verkehrsfläche: 104 Hektar pro Tag, 11 November 2009; Available online: http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Presse/pm/2009/11/PD09__426__331,templateId=renderPrint.psml (accessed on 6 April 2010). Data processed by own calculations.
39. Communiqué on Land and Resources of China 2004 and 2006; Ministry of Land and Resources P.R.C. (MoLR): Beijing, China, 2006; Available online: http://www.mlr.gov.cn/mlrenglish/magazine/2006/200711/t20071108_90721.html and http://www.mlr.gov.cn/mlrenglish/magazine/2004/200710/t20071011_86304.html (accessed on 10 January 2010).
40. Lin, G.C.S.; Ho, S.P.S. China's land resources and land-use change: insights from the 1996 land survey. Land Use Policy 2003, 20, 87-107. Data referring to the population development are available online: http://www.chinability.com/Population.htm (accessed on 16 April 2010). Data processed by own calculations
41. The Report of Land and Human Development in Cambodia; Supreme National Economic Council: Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2007; Available online: http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/cambodia/land.pdf (accessed on 8 December 2009).
42. George, H. Progress and Poverty; William Hinton: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1879; Available online: http://www.progressandpoverty.org (accessed on 12 October 2009).
43. Pfannschmidt, M. Vergessener Faktor Boden-Marktgerechte Bodenbewertung und Raumordnung; Gauke-Verlag: Lütjenburg, Germany, 1990.
44. Situationsbericht 2010-Trends und Fakten zur Landwirtschaft; German Farmers' Association (Deutscher Bauernverband, DBV): Berlin, Germany, 2009
45. Evans, A.W. Economics, Real Estate and the Supply of Land; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2004.
46. Löhr, D. Das stumpfe Schwert der Bodenwertbesteuerung-Zugleich ein Plädoyer für das Erbbaurecht. Z Sozialökon. 2006, 43, 11-19.
47. Mankiw, N.G.; Taylor, M.P. Economics; Cengage Learning Ltd.: Andover; Hampshire, UK, 2006.
48. Warner, T. Die deutsche Land-und Steuerordnung von Tsingtau und ihr Weiterwirken auf China. Z Sozialökon. 1999, 36, 15-18.
49. Perkins, D.H. China's Land System: Past, Present and Future. In Property Rights and Land Policies; Ingram, G.K., Hong, Y.H., Eds.; Lincoln Institute of Land Policy: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 70-95.
50. Krumm, R. Die Baulandausweisungsumlage als ökonomisches Steuerungsinstrument einer nachhaltigen Flächenpolitik; IAW Discussion Papers; IAW: Tübingen, Germany, 2002.
51. Coase, R. The Problem of Social Cost. J. Law Econ. 1960, 3, 1-44.
52. Pejovich, S. The Economics of Property Rights: Towards a Theory of Comparative Systems; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.
53. Dieterich, H. Bodenordnung und Bodenpolitik. In Kompendium der Wohnungswirtschaft, 4th ed.; Jenkis, H., Ed.; Oldenbourg-Verlag: Munich, Germany; Vienna, Austria, 2001; pp. 516-542.
54. Asia Regional Assessment for the FAO Voluntary Guidelines on Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land and Other Natural Resources; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Hanoi, Vietnam, 2009; Available online: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/ak802e/ak802e00.pdf (accessed on 14 December 2009).