Treatment of trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation or dynamic hip screw systems: A meta-analysis

Journal of International Medical Research

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 839-851

  Zeng, C ^a   Wang, Y R ^a   Wei, J ^a   Gao, S G ^a   Zhang, F J ^a   Sun, Z Q ^a   Lei, Guang Hua ^a  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Dynamic hip screw; Hip fracture; Internal fracture fixation; Meta analysis; Perioperative variables; Postoperative complications; Proximal femoral nail antirotation

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BONE NAIL; BONE SCREW; BRAIN INFARCTION; DECUBITUS; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DYNAMIC HIP SCREW; FEMALE; FEMUR TROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; FIXATION FAILURE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEART FAILURE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG INFECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTIROTATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RELIABILITY; RISK REDUCTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRESS ULCER; SURGICAL RISK; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; URINARY TRACT INFECTION;

EID: 84863112065     PISSN: 03000605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/147323001204000302     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Gullberg B, Duppe H, Nilsson B, et al: Incidence of hip fractures in Malmö, Sweden (1950-1991). Bone 1993; 14(suppl 1): S23-S29.
2. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, et al: Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone 1996; 18(1 suppl): 57S-63S.
3. Duque G, Demontiero O, Troen BR: Prevention and treatment of senile osteoporosis and hip fractures. Minerva Med 2009; 100: 79-94.
4. Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Aharonoff GB, et al: Predictors of functional recovery after hip fracture in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 348: 22-28.
5. Parker MJ, Handoll HH: Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 16: CD000093.
6. Saudan M, Lübbeke A, Sadowski C, et al: Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: a randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. J Orthop Trauma 2002; 16: 386-393.
7. Wild M, Jungbluth P, Thelen S, et al: The dynamics of proximal femoral nails: a clinical comparison between PFNA and Targon PF. Orthopedics 2010; 33 [doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100625-04].
8. Stern R, Lübbeke A, Suva D, et al: Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 1855-1861.
9. Xu YZ, Geng DC, Mao HQ, et al: A comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation device and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fracture. J Int Med Res 2010; 38: 1266-1275.
10. Wu J, Chen B, Xu YQ, et al: A comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation device and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of elderly pertrochanteric fracture. Chinese Journal of Orthopedic Trauma 2009; 11: 1189-1191 [in Chinese].
11. Li QD: The treatment of elderly pertrochanteric fracture patients with proximal femoral nail. China Healthcare Innovation 2009; 4: 52-53 [in Chinese].
12. Cui HY: The Clinical Efficacy of Treatment of Elderly Pertrochanteric Fracture with PFNA. MSc dissertation, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China, 2009 [in Chinese].
13. Wei T: Clinical observation of proximal femoral nail antirotation in treatment of aged unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Practical Preventive Medicine 2010; 17: 1826-1828 [in Chinese, English abstract].
14. Zhang WC: A comparison of the PFNA device and DHS in the treatment of elderly pertrochanteric fracture. Medical Information 2010; 8: 2088-2089 [in Chinese].
15. Cheng HL, Pang RM, Liu HC, et al: Effect of PFNA on treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture. Journal of Hainan Medical College 2011; 4: 532-534 [in Chinese].
16. Lai XZ, Li F, Liu DX, et al: A comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation device and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of pertrochanteric fracture. Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine 2011; 34: 70-72 [in Chinese].
17. Wang CX: A comparison of the PFNA device and DHS in the treatment of elderly pertrochanteric fracture. Chinese and Foreign Medical Research 2011; 9: 131-132 [in Chinese].
18. Garg B, Marimuthu K, Kumar V, et al: Outcome of short proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw for fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures. A randomised prospective comparative trial. Hip Int 2011; 21: 531-536.
19. Zou J, Xu Y, Yang H: A comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw devices in trochanteric fractures. J Int Med Res 2009; 37: 1057-1064.
20. Zhu ES, Sun JY, Wang Y, et al: Clinical observation of PFNA and DHS in treatment of aged unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury 2009; 24: 150-151 [in Chinese].
21. Harris WH: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969; 51: 737-755.
22. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al: Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12.
23. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, et al: Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408-412.
24. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, et al: Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in metaanalyses? Lancet 1998; 352: 609-613.
25. Begg CB, Mazumdar M: Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50: 1088-1101.
26. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, et al: Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21(10 suppl): S1-S133.
27. Rha JD, Kim YH, Yoon SI, et al: Factors affecting sliding of the lag screw in intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop 1993; 17: 320-324.
28. PFNA. Leading the Way to Optimal Stability. Original Instruments and Implants of the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation-AO/ASIF. Bettlach: Stratec Medical, 2004 (available at: http://www.intrameduller civilemekursu.org/civi/SurgTech%20PFNA.pdf).
29. Kamel HK, Iqbal MA, Mogallapu R, et al: Time to ambulation after hip fracture surgery: relation to hospitalization outcomes. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003; 58: 1042-1045.
30. Kayali C, Agus H, Ozluk S, et al: Treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: internal fixation versus cone hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2006; 14: 240-244.
31. McKibbin B: The biology of fracture healing in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1978; 60-B: 150-162.