IN THE CLASSROOM: APPROACHES TO BIOETHICS FOR SENIOR STUDENTS

Ethics in the Science and Technology Classroom: A New Approach to Teaching and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 55-67

  Conner, Lindsey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863109337     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789460910715_006     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Armstrong, K., & Weber, K. (1991). Genetic engineering - a lesson on bioethics for the classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 53(5), 294-297.
2. Butterfield, C. (1987). Values and biology. Cheltenham, Victoria: Hawker Brownlow Education.
3. Caldwell, R. (2005). Roadmap to a futures study. Retrieved from http://cals.arizona/edu/futures/rlc/futures-roadmap.html
4. Cheek, D. (1992). Thinking constructively about science, technology and society education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5. Conner, L. (2000). Societal Issues: recommendations for teaching in science and technology. Pacific Asian Education, 12(1), 19-30.
6. Conner, L. (2003). The importance of developing critical thinking in issues education. New Zealand Biotechnology Association, 56, 58-71.
7. Conner, L. (2004a). Let’s Ask: “Is the content important to our students”. New Zealand Council for Educational Research. SET, 2, 25-28.
8. Conner, L. (2004b). Teaching values through the process of facilitation. Pacific Asian Education, 16(2), 65-80.
9. Conner, L. (2005). Helping students to use metacognition. New Zealand Council for Educational Research. SET, (3), 54-58.
10. Conner, L. N. (2007). Cueing metacognition to improve researching and essay writing in a final year high school biology class. Research in Science Education, 37(1), 1-16.
11. Conner, L. (2008). The importance of knowledge development in bioethics education. In D. Macer (Ed.). Asia Pacific perspectives on bioethics education (pp. 1-7). Bangkok: UNESCO Regional Unit for Social and Human Science in Asia and the Pacific.
12. Conner, L., Buntting, C, Saunders, K., & Milne, L. (2007). A futures model for biotechnology education. Paper presented at the World STE conference, Perth Australia, 8-12 July, 2007.
13. Dawson, V. (1996). A constructivist approach to teaching transplantation technology in science. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42(4), 15-20.
14. De Bono, E. (1992). Teach your child how to think. London: Viking.
15. Fisher, R. (1998). Teaching thinking: Philosophical enquiry in the classroom. London: Cassell.
16. Fraenkel, J. (1977). How to teach about values: An analytic approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17. Geddis, A. (1991). Improving the quality of science classroom discourses in the science classroom: Reflecting on initial difficulties. Research in Science Education, 25(3), 317-336.
18. Gidley, J. (2002). Global youth culture: A transdisciplinary perspective. In J. Gidley & S. Inayatullah (Eds.), Youth futures: Comparative research and transformative visions. Westport, CA: Praeger.
19. Gilbert, J. (2005). Catching the knowledge wave? The knowledge society and the future of education. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
20. Hutchinson, F. (1998). Young people’s hopes and fears for the future. In D. Hicks & R. Slaughter (Eds.), World Year Book of education, 1998: Futures education (pp. 133-147). London: Kogan Page.
21. Jarvis, S., Hickford, J., & Conner, L. (1998). Biodecisions. Lincoln, New Zealand: Crop and Food.
22. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science : Language, learning and values . Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
23. Lipman, M. (1987). Ethical reasoning and the craft of moral practice. Journal oof Moral Education, 16 (2), 139-147.
24. Macer, D. (2006, July 26-28). Goals of bioethics education and the conference. Paper presented at the UNESCO Asia-Pacific Conference on Bioethics Education, Seoul, Rep. of Korea.
25. McKim, A., Buntting, C., Conner, L., Hipkins, R., Milne, L., Saunders, K., et al. (2006). Research and development of a biofutures approach for biotechnology education. Final report to the Ministry of Research, Science & Technology. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
26. Ministry of Education. (1993). Science in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
27. Ministry of Education. (1994). Biology in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
28. Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
29. Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
30. Nussbaum, M., & Sinatra, G. (2003). Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 384-395.
31. Oser, F. (1986). Moral education and values education. The discourse perspective. In M. C. Wittrock, (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 917-941). New York: Macmillan.
32. Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 26(4), 411-423.
33. Samanci, K., Keskin, O., & Arslan, O. (2006, July 26-28). Where are we standing on bioethics education? Paper presented at the UNESCO Asia-Pacific Conference on Bioethics Education, Seoul, Rep. of Korea.
34. Seethaler, S. (2004). Genetically modified food in perspective: An inquiry-based curriculum to help middle school students make sense of tradeoffs. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1765-1785.
35. Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 235-260.
36. Solomon, J. (1991). Group discussions in the classroom. School Science Review, 72(261), 29-34.
37. Sutton, C. (1992). Words, science and learning. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
38. Tsai, C.-C. (2002). A science teacher’s reflections and knowledge growth about STS instruction after actual implementation. Science Education, 86(1), 23-41.