Introduction: Can academic research be managerially actionable? What are the requirements for determining this?

Academy of Management Learning and Education

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 244-246

  Bartunek, Jean M ^a   Egri, Carolyn P ^b  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863085940     PISSN: 1537260X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amle.2012.0134     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4: 75-91.
2. Markides, C. 2011. Crossing the chasm: How to convert relevant research into managerially useful research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47: 121-134.
3. Mohrman, S. A., & Lawler, E. E. (Eds.). 2011. Useful research: Advancing theory and practice. San Francisco: Berrett- Koehler.
4. O'Brien, J. P., Drnevich, P. L., Crook, T. R., & Armstrong, C. E. 2010. Does business school research add economic value for students? Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9: 638-651.
5. Palmer, D., Dick, B., & Freiburger, N. 2009. Rigor and relevance in organization studies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18: 265-272.
6. Pearce, J. L. 2009. Organizational behavior: Real research for real managers (2nd ed.). Irvine, CA: Melvin & Leigh.
7. Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. 2002. The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1: 78-95.
8. Porter, L. W., & McKibbin, L. E. 1988. Management education and development: Drift or thrust into the 21st century. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.