Clinical results after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty;Klinische Ergebnisse nach Descemet-Membran-Endothelzelltransplantation

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde

Volumn 229, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 615-619

  Yoeruek, E ^a   Bayyoud, T ^a   Rock D ^a   Szurman, P ^a,b   Bartz Schmidt, K U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b Knappschaftskrankenhaus Sulzbach   (Germany)

Author keywords

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; Descemet membrane preparation; membrane dissection; posterior lamellar keratoplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CELL DENSITY; CORNEA DYSTROPHY; DESCEMET MEMBRANE ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; ENDOPHTHALMITIS; ENDOTHELIAL CELL DECOMPENSATION; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUCHS ENDOTHELIAL DYSTROPHY; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOPATHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PACHYMETRY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; REFRACTION ERROR; SLIT LAMP; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IRIDOCORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL SYNDROME; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION DISORDERS;

EID: 84863085636     PISSN: 00232165     EISSN: 14393999     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312913     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ham L, Dapena I, van Luijk C et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: review of the first 50 consecutive cases. Eye: 2009; 2 1990 1998
2. Mühlbauer F. Über die Transplantation der Cornea. Gekrönte Preisschrift. J. Lindauer, München Abstract in Zeis: Schmidt CC (Hrsg) Jahrbücher der in- und ausländischen gesamten Medizin. Leipzig Otto Wiegand: 1840; 267 268
3. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, McAllum P et al. Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology: 2008; 115 1525 1533
4. Dapena I, Ham L, Melles GR. Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK - the thinner the better? Curr Opin Ophthalmol: 2009; 20 299 307
5. Jain S, Azar DT. New lamellar keratoplasty techniques: posterior keratoplasty and deep lamellar keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol: 2001; 12 262 268 (Pubitemid 32751683)
6. Price MO, Gorovoy M, Benetz BA et al. Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty outcomes compared with penetrating keratoplasty from the Cornea Donor Study. Ophthalmology: 2010; 117 438 444
7. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES et al. Precut tissue for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: vision, astigmatism, and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology: 2009; 116 248 256
8. Van Dijk K, Dapena I, Moutsouris K et al. First DLEK series: 10-year follow-up. Ophthalmology: 2011; 118 424.e1 424.e3
9. Melles GR. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. Cornea: 2006; 25 879 881 (Pubitemid 44763843)
10. Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea: 2006; 25 987 990 (Pubitemid 44763867)
11. Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. DMEK: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmologe: 2010; 107 370 376
12. Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K et al. Standardized no-touch" technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol: 2011; 129 88 94
13. Kruse FE, Laaser K, Cursiefen C et al. A stepwise approach to donor preparation and insertion increases safety and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea: 2011; 30 580 587
14. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Levinger E et al. Retrospective contralateral study comparing descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea: 2009; 28 485 488
15. Dapena I, Ham L, Droutsas K et al. Learning Curve in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: First Series of 135 Consecutive Cases. Ophthalmology: 2011; 118 2147 2154
16. Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: fellow eyes comparison of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea: 2011; 30 1382 1386
17. Hjortdal J, Ehlers N. Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Acta Ophthalmol: 2009; 87 310 314
18. Koenig SB, Covert DJ, Dupps WJ Jr et al. Visual acuity, refractive error, and endothelial cell density six months after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Cornea: 2007; 26 670 674 (Pubitemid 47080283)
19. Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B et al. Preliminary clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol: 2008; 145 222 227
20. Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM et al. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology: 2009; 116 2361 2368
21. Dirisamer M, Dapena I, Ham L et al. Patterns of corneal endothelialization and corneal clearance after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol: 2011; 152 543 555
22. Jacobi C, Zhivov A, Korbmacher J et al. Evidence of endothelial cell migration after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol: 2011; 152 537 542
23. Ham L, Dapena I, Moutsouris K et al. Refractive change and stability after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Effect of corneal dehydration-induced hyperopic shift on intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg: 2011; 37 1455 1464
24. Parker J, Dirisamer M, Naveiras M et al. Endothelial cell density after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 1- to 4-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol: 2011; 151 1107 1107
25. Ham L, Dapena I, Van Der Wees J et al. Endothelial cell density after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 1- to 3-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol: 2010; 149 1016 1017
26. Heindl LM, Riss S, Laaser K et al. Split cornea transplantation for 2 recipients - review of the first 100 consecutive patients. Am J Ophthalmol: 2011; 152 523 532
27. Heindl LM, Riss S, Bachmann BO et al. Split cornea transplantation for 2 recipients: a new strategy to reduce corneal tissue cost and shortage. Ophthalmology: 2011; 118 294 301