A study of the effect of experimental test parameters on data scatter in microbond testing

Journal of Composite Materials

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 275-284

  Pandey, Gajendra ^a   Kareliya, Chirag H ^a   Singh, Raman P ^a  

^a Oklahoma State University   (United States)

Author keywords

fiber matrix bond; finite element analysis (FEA); interface interphase; mechanical properties; Microbond

Indexed keywords

2-D MODEL; 3D MODELS; BLADE GEOMETRY; DATA SCATTER; EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FIBER/MATRIX BONDS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS (FEA); INTERFACE/INTERPHASE; INTERFACIAL STRENGTH; MICROBOND; OBSERVED DATA; SHEAR LAG ANALYSIS; SHEAR-LAG MODEL; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) FINITE ELEMENT MODELS;

EXPERIMENTS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; STRESS CONCENTRATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 84863067953     PISSN: 00219983     EISSN: 1530793X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0021998311410508     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Simon RA, Prosen SP, Duffy J. Carbon fiber composites. Nature. 1967 ; 213: 1113-1114
2. Favre JP, Perrin J. Carbon fibre adhesion to organic matrices. J Mat Sci. 1972 ; 7: 1113-1118
3. Sarraf H, Skarpová L, Louda P. Surface modification of carbon fibers. J Achv Mat Manf Eng. 2007 ; 25 (2). 24-30
4. Kelly A, Tyson WR. Tensile properties of fiber-reinforced metals-cop- per/tungsten and copper/molybdenum. J Mech Phys Solids. 1965 ; 13 (6). 329-338
5. Drzal LT, Rich MJ, Camping JD and Park WJ. Interfacial shear strength and failure mechanisms in graphite fiber composites, 35th Conference of Rein- forced Plastics/Composites Institute New York (USA), 1980; Society of the Plastics Industry, Section 20C.
6. Herrerafeanco PJ, Drzal LT. Comparison of methods for the measurement of fiber matrix adhesion in composites. Composites. 1992 ; 23 (1). 2-27
7. Mandell JF, Chen JH and McGarry FJ. A microdebonding test for in-situ fiber-matrix bond strength and moisture effects, 35th Conference of Reinforced Plastics/Composites Institute New York (USA), 1980; Society of the Plastics Industry, Section 26D.
8. Mandell JF, Grande DH, Tsiang TH Composite materials: testing and design. Whitney JM, ed. Philadelphia (USA), 1986: ASTM-STP ; 1986: 87-108.
9. Favre JP, Perrin J. Carbon fiber adhesion to organic matrices. J Mater Sci. 1972 ; 7 (10). 1113-1118
10. Chua PS, Piggott MR. The glass-fiber polymer interface. 1. Theoretical consideration for single fiber pull-out tests. Compos Sci Technol. 1985 ; 22 (1). 33-42 (Pubitemid 15567255)
11. Miller B, Muri P, Rebenfeld L. A microbond method for determination of the shear-strength of a fiber-resin interface. Compos Sci Technol. 1987 ; 28 (1). 17-32 (Pubitemid 17527615)
12. Gaur U, Miller B. Microbond method for determination of the shear strength of a fiber/resin interface: evaluation of experimental parameters. Compos Sci Technol. 1989 ; 34: 35-51
13. Nairn JA. On the use of shear-lag methods for analysis of stress transfer in unidirectional composites. Mech Mater. 1997 ; 26: 63-80 (Pubitemid 127372148)
14. Liu CH, Nairn JA. Analytical fracture mechanics of the microbond test including the effects of friction and thermal stresses. J Adhes Adhesives. 1999 ; 19: 59-70
15. Kareliya CH, Pandey G, Singh RP and Hinkley J. Interfacial mi-cromechanics of fluorinated-epoxy carbon fiber composites, SEM Annual Conference & Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 2009; 203-302.
16. Zinck P, Wagner HD, Salmon L, Gerard JF. Are microcomposites realistic models of the fibre/matrix interface? I. Micromechanical modeling. Polymer. 2001 ; 42 (12). 5401-5413 (Pubitemid 32242278)
17. Kang S, Lee D, Choi N. Fiber/epoxy interfacial shear strength measured by the microdroplet test. Compos Sci Technol. 2009 ; 69 (2). 245-251
18. Ash JT, Cross WM, Svalstad D, Kellar JJ, Kjerengtroen L. Finite element evaluation of the microbond test: meniscus effect, interphase region, and vise angle. Compos Sci Technol. 2003 ; 63 (5). 641-651 (Pubitemid 36175013)
19. Herrera-Franco PJ, Rao V, Drzal LT, Chiang MY. Bond strength measurements in composites-analysis of experimental techniques. Composites Engr. 1992 ; 2 (1). 31-45
20. Day RJ, Rodrigez JVC. Investigation of the micromechanics of the microbond test. Compos Sci Technol. 1998 ; 58 (6). 907-914 (Pubitemid 28416242)
21. Kessler H, Schuller T, Beckert W, Lauke B. A fracture-mechanics model of the microbond test with interface friction. Compos Sci Technol. 1999 ; 59 (15). 2231-2242 (Pubitemid 30059561)
22. Schuller T, Bahr U, Beckert W, Lauke B. Fracture mechanics analysis of the microbond test. Composites Part A. 1998 ; 29A: 1083-1089 (Pubitemid 128416176)
23. Nishikawa M, Okabe T, Hemmi K, Takeda N. Micromechanical modeling of the microbond test to quantify the interfacial properties of fiber-reinforced composites. Int J Solids Struct. 2008 ; 45 (14-15). 4098-4113
24. Zhandarov SF, Pisanova EV. The local bond strength and its determination by fragmentation and pull-out tests. Compos Sci Technol. 1997 ; 7 (8). 957-964
25. Carroll BJ. Accurate measurement of contact-angle, phase contact areas, drop. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1976 ; 57 (3). 488-495
26. Song BH, Bismarck A, Tahhan R, Springer J. A generalized drop length-height method for determination of contact angle in drop-on-fiber systems. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1998 ; 197 (1). 68-77 (Pubitemid 28383534)