Open peer review by a selected-papers network

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue JANUARY 2012, 2012, Pages

  Lee, Christopher ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Engineering IV   (United States)

Author keywords

Interdisciplinary research; Journal; Open evaluation; Peer review; Publishing; Scientometrics

Indexed keywords

INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; JOURNAL; OPEN EVALUATION; PEER REVIEW; SCIENTOMETRICS;

PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; REVIEWS; SEARCH ENGINES;

PEER TO PEER NETWORKS;

COST; DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; REVIEW;

EID: 84863057282     PISSN: 16625188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00001     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Acharya, A., and Verstak, A. (2005). Google Scholar. Available at: http://scholar.google.com/
2. Adler, R., Ewing, J., and Taylor, P. (2008). Citation Statistics. A Report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS). IMU Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research. Available at: http://www. mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/ Report/CitationStatistics.pdf
3. Baez, J. (1993-2010). This Weeks Finds in Mathematical Physics. Available at: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/ TWF.html
4. Baez, J., Corfield, D., Hoffnung, A., Huerta, J., Leinster, T., Shulman, M., Schreiber, U., and Willerton, S. (2007). The n-Category Cafe. Available at: http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/ category/
5. Baez, M., Birukou, A., Casati, F., and Marchese, M. (2010). Addressing information overload in the scientific community. IEEE Internet Comput. 14, 31-38.
6. Birukou, A., Wakeling, J. R., Bar- tolini, C., Casati, F., Marchese, M., Mirylenka, K., Osman, N., Ragone, A., Sierra, C., and Wassef, A. (2011). Alternatives to peer review: novel approaches for research evaluation. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 5:56. doi:10.3389/fncom.2011.00056
7. Cameron, R., Hall, C., Emamy, K., and Caddy, J. (2004). citeUlike.Org A Free Service for Managing and Discovering Scholarly References. Available at: http://citeulike.org/
8. Cornell University Library. (1996). The arXiv e-print Repository. Available at: http://arxiv.org/
9. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., and Hilf, E. R. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Ser. Rev. 30, 36-40.
10. Hitchcock, S., Brody, T., Gutteridge, C., Carr, L., Hall, W., Harnad, S., Bergmark, D., and Lagoze, C. (2002). Open citation linking: the way forward. D-LibMag. 8.
11. Koonin, E. V., Landweber, L. F., and Lipman, D. J. (2006). Biology Direct, An Open Access, Peer-Reviewed Online Journal. Available at: http://www. biology-direct.com/
12. Kriegeskorte, N. (2009). The Future of Scientific Publishing: Open PostPublication Peer Review. Available at: http://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/
13. Lee, C. (2006). Peer review of interdisciplinary scientific papers: boundary-crossing research meetsborder patrol. Nature Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05034.html
14. National Library of Medicine. (1996). The PubMed Database of Biomedical Literature. Available at: http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
15. Neylon, C. (2005). Science in the Open. Available at: http://cameronneylon.net/
16. Nielsen, M. (2008). The Future of Science. Available at: http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of- science-2/
17. Peters, D. P., and Ceci, S. J. (1982). Peerreview practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles, submitted again. Behav. Brain Sci. 5,187-195.
18. Public Library of Science. (2006). PLoS ONE: Accelerating the Publication of Peer-Reviewed Science. Available at: http://www.plosone.org/
19. Smith, R. W. (2009). In search of an optimal peer review system. J. Particip. Med. 1, e13.
20. Tao, T. (2007). What's New. Available at: http://terrytao.wordpress.com/
21. The Peer Evaluation Team. (2010). PeerEvaluation.Org: Empowering Scholars. Available at: http://peer evaluation.org/
22. Torvalds, L., and Hamano, J. (2005). Git: The Fast Version Control System. Available at: http://git- scm.com/
23. von Muhlen, M. (2011). We Need a GitHub of Science. Available at: http://marciovm.com/i-want-a- github-of-science