Effect of bladder neck preservation and posterior urethral reconstruction during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for urinary continence

Korean Journal of Urology

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 29-33

  You, Youn Chul ^a   Kim, Tae Hyo ^a   Sung, Gyung Tak ^a  

^a Dong A University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLADDER NECK; BLADDER NECK PRESERVATION; BLEEDING; CATHETERIZATION; CONTINENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; URETHROPLASTY; URINARY TRACT SURGERY; URINE CONTINENCE; URINE INCONTINENCE;

EID: 84863057017     PISSN: 20056737     EISSN: 20056745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.1.29     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cho JW, Kim TH, Sung GT. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's experience. Korean J Urol 2009;50:1198-202.
2. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 2001;166:2101-8.
3. Eden CG, Cahill D, Vass JA, Adams TH, Dauleh MI. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series. BJU Int 2002;90: 876-82.
4. Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Fromont G, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute. J Urol 2003;169:1261-6.
5. Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Katz R, De La Taille A, Saint F, Vordos D, et al. Urinary continence and erectile function: a prospective evaluation of functional results after radical laparoscopic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2002;42:338-43.
6. Peyromaure M, Ravery V, Boccon-Gibod L. The management of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2002;90:155-61.
7. Burnett AL, Mostwin JL. In situ anatomical study of the male urethral sphincteric complex: relevance to continence preservation following major pelvic surgery. J Urol 1998;160:1301-6.
8. Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, Gadda F, Dell'Orto P, Rocco B, et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2006;175:2201-6.
9. Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S, Santoro L, Bozzola A, Galli S, et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:996-1003.
10. Duthie JB, Pickford JE, Gilling PJ. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a 2010 update. N Z Med J 2010;123:30-4.
11. Rebuck DA, Haywood S, McDermott K, Perry KT, Nadler RB. What is the long-term relevance of clinically detected postoperative anastomotic urine leakage after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2011;108:733-8.
12. Asimakopoulos AD, Annino F, D'Orazio A, Pereira CF, Mugnier C, Hoepffner JL, et al. Complete periprostatic anatomy preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP): the new pubovesical complex-sparing technique. Eur Urol 2010;58:407-17.
13. Jeong W, Araki M, Park SY, Lee YH, Kumon H, Hong SJ, Rha KH. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the Asian population: modified port configuration and ultradissection. Int J Urol 2010;17:297-300.