Mining the interests of Chinese microbloggers via keyword extraction

Frontiers of Computer Science in China

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 76-87

  Liu, Zhiyuan ^a   Chen, Xinxiong ^a   Sun, Maosong ^a  

^a TSINGHUA NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Chinese keyword extraction; microblogging; Sina Weibo; user interests

Indexed keywords

DAILY LIVES; KEYWORD EXTRACTION; MICRO-BLOG; MICROBLOGGING; NEWS ARTICLES; SCIENTIFIC PAPERS; SHARING INFORMATION; SINA WEIBO; USER INTERESTS; USERS' INTERESTS; WEB USERS;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

WEBSITES;

EID: 84863035913     PISSN: 16737350     EISSN: 16737466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11704-011-1174-8     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Kwak H, Lee C, Park H, Moon S. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2010, 591-600.
2. Liu Z, Chen X, Zheng Y, Sun M. Automatic keyphrase extraction by bridging vocabulary gap. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. 2011, 135-144.
3. Brown P F, Pietra S A D, Pietra V J D, Mercer R L. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation. Computational linguistics, 1993, 19(2): 263-311.
4. Koehn P. Statistical Machine Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
5. Berger A L, Lafferty J D. Information retrieval as statistical translation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1999, 222-229.
6. Karimzadehgan M, Zhai C X. Estimation of statistical translation models based on mutual information for ad hoc information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2010, 323-330.
7. Duygulu P, Barnard K, de Freitas J F G, Forsyth D A. Object recognition as machine translation: learning a lexicon for a fixed image vocabulary. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Computer Vision, Part IV. 2002, 97-112.
8. Berger A L, Caruana R, Cohn D, Freitag D, Mittal V O. Bridging the lexical chasm: statistical approaches to answer-finding. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2000, 192-199.
9. Echihabi A, Marcu D. A noisy-channel approach to question answering. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2003, 16-23.
10. Murdock V, Croft W B. Simple translation models for sentence retrieval in factoid question answering. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2004 Workshop on Information Retrieval for Question Answering. 2004.
11. Soricut R, Brill E. Automatic question answering using the web: beyond the factoid. Information Retrieval, 2006, 9(2): 191-206.
12. Xue X, Jeon J, Croft W B. Retrieval models for question and answer archives. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2008, 475-482.
13. Riezler S, Vasserman A, Tsochantaridis I, Mittal V, Liu Y. Statistical machine translation for query expansion in answer retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2007, 464-471.
14. Riezler S, Liu Y, Vasserman A. Translating queries into snippets for improved query expansion. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2008, 737-744.
15. Riezler S, Liu Y. Query rewriting using monolingual statistical machine translation. Computational Linguistics, 2010, 36(3): 569-582.
16. Banko M, Mittal V O, Witbrock M J. Headline generation based on statistical translation. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2000, 318-325.
17. Liu Z, Wang H, Wu H, Li S. Collocation extraction using monolingual word alignment method. In: Proceedings of 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2009, 487-495.
18. Liu Z, Wang H, Wu H, Li S. Improving statistical machine translation with monolingual collocation. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2010, 825-833.
19. Quirk C, Brockett C, Dolan W B. Monolingual machine translation for paraphrase generation. In: Proceedings of 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2004, 142-149.
20. Zhao S, Wang H, Liu T. Paraphrasing with search engine query logs. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2010, 1317-1325.
21. Frank E, Paynter G W, Witten I H, Gutwin C, Nevill-Manning C G. Domain-specific keyphrase extraction. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1999, 668-673.
22. Witten I H, Paynter G W, Frank E, Gutwin C, Nevill-Manning C G. Kea: practical automatic keyphrase extraction. In: Proceedings of 4th ACM conference on Digital Libraries. 1999, 254-255.
23. Turney P D. Learning algorithms for keyphrase extraction. Information Retrieval, 2000, 2(4): 303-336.
24. Salton G, Buckley C. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 1988, 24(5): 513-523.
25. Mihalcea R, Tarau P. Textrank: bringing order into texts. In: Proceedings of 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2004, 404-411.
26. Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T. The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. Technical Report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.
27. Landauer T K, Foltz PW, Laham D. An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 1998, 25(2&3): 259-284.
28. Hofmann T. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In: Proceedings of 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1999, 50-57.
29. Blei D M, Ng A Y, Jordan M I. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3: 993-1022.
30. Heinrich G. Parameter estimation for text analysis. http://www. arbylon. net/publications/text-est.
31. Blei D M, Lafferty J D. Topic Models. In: Srivastava A, Sahami M, eds. Text Mining: Classification, Clustering, and Applications. London: Chapman & Hall, 2009.
32. Zhao D, Rosson MB. How and why people twitter: the role that microblogging plays in informal communication at work. In: Proceedings of ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work. 2009, 243-252.
33. Savage N. Twitter as medium and message. Communications of the ACM, 2011, 54(3): 18-20.
34. Zhao W X, Jiang J, Weng J, He J, Lim E, Yan H, Li X. Comparing twitter and traditional media using topic models. In: Proceedings of the 33rd European Conference on IR Research. 2011, 338-349.
35. Java A, Song X, Finin T, Tseng B. Why we Twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In: Proceedings of 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis. 2007, 56-65.
36. Teevan J, Ramage D, Morris MR. #Twittersearch: a comparison of microblog search and web search. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining. 2011, 35-44.
37. Mustafaraj E, Metaxas P. From obscurity to prominence in minutes: political speech and real-time search. In: Proceedings of Web Science Conference. 2010.
38. Phelan O, McCarthy K, Smyth B. Using twitter to recommend realtime topical news. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Recommender systems. 2009, 385-388.
39. Sakaki T, Okazaki M, Matsuo Y. Earthquake shakes twitter users: realtime event detection by social sensors. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2010, 851-860.
40. Culotta A. Detecting influenza outbreaks by analyzing twitter messages. In: Proceedings of KDD Workshop on Social Media Analytics. 2010.
41. Earle P S, Guy M, Ostrum C, Horvath S, Buckmaster R A. Omg earthquake! Can twitter improve earthquake response? In: Proceedings of 2009 AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol 1. 2009.
42. Petrovic S, Osborne M, Lavrenko V. Streaming first story detection with application to Twitter. In: Proceedings of 2010 Human Language Technologies: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2010, 181-189.
43. Cha M, Haddadi H, Benevenuto F, Gummadi K P. Measuring user influence in Twitter: the million follower fallacy. In: Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social. 2010, 10-17.
44. Tumasjan A, Sprenger T O, Sandner P G, Welpe I M. Predicting elections with Twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In: Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2010, 178-185.
45. OConnor B, Balasubramanyan R, Routledge B R, Smith N A. From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference onWeblogs and Social Media. 2010, 122-129.
46. Pak A, Paroubek P. Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. 2010.
47. Jiang L, Yu M, Zhou M, Liu X, Zhao T. Target-dependent twitter sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Vol 1. 2011, 151-160.
48. Agarwal A, Xie B, Vovsha I, Rambowand O, Passonneau R. Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Language in Social Media. 2011, 30-38.
49. Qu Z, Liu Y. Interactive group suggesting for twitter. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Vol 2. 2011, 519-523.
50. Huang J, Thornton K M, Efthimiadis E N. Conversational tagging in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. 2010, 173-178.
51. Efron M. Hashtag retrieval in a microblogging environment. In: Proceeding of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2010, 787-788.
52. Gimpel K, Schneider N, Oonnor B, Das D, Mills D, Eisenstein J, Heilman M, Yogatama D, Flanigan J, Smith N A. Part-of-speech tagging for twitter: annotation, features, and experiments. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Vol 2. 2011, 42-47.
53. Finin T, Murnane W, Karandikar A, Keller N, Martineau J, Dredze M. Annotating named entities in twitter data with crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon's Mechanical Turk. 2010, 80-88.
54. Liu X, Zhang S, Wei F, Zhou M. Recognizing named entities in tweets. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Human Language Technologies, Vol 1. 2011, 359-367.
55. Ritter A, Clark S, Mausam, Etzioni O. Named entity recognition in tweets: an experimental study. In: Proceedings of 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2011, 1524-1534.
56. Han B, Baldwin T. Lexical normalisation of short text messages: makn sens a #twitter. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Vol 1. 2011, 368-378.
57. Wu W, Zhang B, Ostendorf M. Automatic generation of personalized annotation tags for twitter users. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of. 2010, 689-692.
58. Zhang K, Sun M. A stacked model based on word lattice for Chinese word segmentation and part-of-speech tagging. http://nlp. csai. tsinghua. edu. cn/thulac.
59. Jiang W, Mi H, Liu Q. Word lattice reranking for Chinese word segmentation and part-of-speech tagging. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2008, 385-392.
60. Viegas F B, Wattenberg M, Feinberg J. Participatory visualization with Wordle. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2009, 15(6): 1137-1144.
61. Och F J, Ney H. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Computational linguistics, 2003, 29(1): 19-51.
62. Wan X, Xiao J. Single document keyphrase extraction using neighborhood knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2008, 855-860.
63. Liu Y, Liu Q, Lin S. Discriminative word alignment by linear modeling. Computational Linguistics, 2010, 36(3): 303-339.