On guiding principles for carbon allocation in eco-physiological growth models

Tree Physiology

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 644-647

  Mäkelä, Annikki ^a   Way, Danielle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; METABOLISM; NOTE; TREE;

CARBON; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; TREES;

EID: 84862994223     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: 17584469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps033     Document Type: Note

References (32)

1. Ågren, G.I., B. Axelsson, J.G.K. Flower-Ellis, S. Linder, H. Persson, H. Staaf and E. Troeng. 1980. Annual carbon budget for a young Scots pine. In Structure and Function of Northern Coniferous Forests-An Ecosystem Study. Ed. T. Persson. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 32:307-313.
2. Ahl, V. and T.F.H. Allen. 1996. Hierarchy theory, a vision, vocabulary and epistemology. Columbia University Press, New York.
3. Bossel, H. 1996. TREEDYN3 forest simulation model. Ecol. Model. 90:187-227.
4. Cannell, M.G.R. and R.C. Dewar. 1994. Carbon allocation in trees: a review of concepts for modelling. Adv. Ecol. Res. 25:59-104. (Pubitemid 2063913)
5. Dewar, R.C. 2010. Maximum entropy production and plant optimization theories. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365:1429-1435.
6. Dewar, R.C., O. Franklin, A. Mäkelä, R.E. McMurtrie and H.T. Valentine. 2009. Optimal function explains forest response to global change. BioScience 59:127-139.
7. Fontes, L., J.D. Bontemps, H. Bugmann, M. Van Oijen, C. Gracia, K. Kramer, M. Lindner, T. Rötzer and J.P. Skovsgaard. 2010. Models for supporting forest management in a changing environment. For. Syst. 19:8-19.
8. 2. New Phytol. 174:811-822. (Pubitemid 46743895)
9. Franklin, O., J. Johansson, R. C. Dewar, U. Dieckmann, R. E. McMurtrie, Å. Brännström and R. Dybzinski. 2012. Modeling carbon allocation in trees: a search for principles. Tree Physiol. 32:648-666.
10. Johnson, I.R. and J.H.M. Thornley. 1987. A model of shoot: root partitioning with optimal growth. Ann. Bot. 60:133-142.
11. King, D.A. 1990. The adaptive signifcance of tree height. Am. Nat. 135:809-828.
12. King, D.A. 1993. A model analysis of the infuence of root and foliage allocation on forest production and competition between trees. Tree Physiol. 12:119-135. (Pubitemid 24412739)
13. Landsberg, J.J. 1986. Physiological ecology of forest production. Academic Press, New York.
14. Le Roux, X., A. Lacointe, A. Escobar-Gutierrez and S. Le Dizes. 2001. Carbon-based models of individual tree growth: a critical appraisal. Ann. For. Sci. 58:469-506. (Pubitemid 32818114)
15. Mäkelä, A. 1985. Differential games in evolutionary theory: height growth strategies of trees. Theor. Popul. Biol. 27:7-24.
16. Mäkelä, A. and R. Sievänen. 1987. Comparison of two shoot-root partitioning models with respect to substrate utilization and functional balance. Ann. Bot. 59:129-140.
17. Mäkelä, A. and R. Sievänen. 1992. Height-growth strategies in open-grown trees. J. Theor. Biol. 159:443-467.
18. Mäkelä, A. and H. Valentine. 2006. Crown ratio infuences allometric scaling in trees. Ecology 87:2967-2972. (Pubitemid 44969245)
19. Mathieu, A., P. H. Cournède, V. Letort, D. Barthélé my and P. de Reffye. 2009. A dynamic model of plant growth with interactions between development and functional mechanisms to study plant structural plasticity related to trophic competition. Ann. Bot. 103:1173-1186.
20. Matyssek, R., R. Agerer, D. Ernst, J-C. Munch, W. Oßwald, H. Pretzsch, E. Priesack, H. Schnyder and D. Treutte. 2005. The plant's capacity in regulating resource demand. Plant Biol. 7:560-580. (Pubitemid 43004024)
21. Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. McMurtrie, R.E. and L. Wolf. 1983. Above-and belowground growth of forest stands: a carbon budget model. Ann. Bot. 52:437-l48.
23. Minchin, P. and A. Lacointe. 2005. New understanding on phloem physiology and possible consequences for modelling long-distance carbon transport. New Phytol. 166:771-779. (Pubitemid 40717680)
24. Niklas, K.J. 1995. Size-dependent allometry of tree height, diameter and trunk-taper. Ann. Bot. 75:217-227.
25. Niklas, K.J. and V. Kerchner. 1984. Mechanical and photosynthetic constraints on the evolution of plant shape. Paleobiology 10:79-101.
26. Pretzsch, H., R. Grote, B. Reineking, T. Rötzer and S.T. Seifert. 2008. Models for forest ecosystem management: a European perspective. Ann. Bot. 101:1065-1087.
27. Reynolds, J.F. and J. Chen. 1996. Modelling whole-plant allocation in relation to carbon and nitrogen supply: coordination versus optimization: opinion. Plant Soil 185:65-74. (Pubitemid 27050056)
28. Sterck, F. and Schieving, F. 2007. 3-D growth patterns of trees: effects of carbon economy, meristem activity, and selection. Ecol. Monogr. 77:405-420. (Pubitemid 351342491)
29. Thornley, J.H.M. 1972. A model to describe the partitioning of photo-synthate during vegetative plant growth. Ann. Bot. 36:419-430.
30. Thornley, J.H.M. 1991. A transport-resistance model of forest growth and partitioning. Ann. Bot. 68:211-226.
31. Warren-Wilson, J. 1972. Control of crop processes. In Crop Processes in Controlled Environments. Eds. A.R. Rees, K.E. Cockshull, D.W. Hand and R.G. Hurd. London: Academic Press, pp 7-30.
32. West, G.B., J.H. Brown and B.J. Enquist. 1999. A general model for the structure and 502 allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400:664-667.