Reply to van Hoorn: Converging lines of evidence

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 26, 2012, Pages

  Henrich, Joseph ^a   Boyd, Robert ^b   McElreath, Richard ^c   Gurven, Michael ^d   Richerson, Peter J ^c   Ensminger, Jean ^e   Alvard, Michael ^f   Barr, Abigail ^g   Barrett, H Clark ^b   Bolyanatz, Alexander ^h   Camerer, Colin F ^e   Cardenas, Juan Camilo ⁱ   Fehr, Ernst ^j   Gintis, Herbert M ^k   Gil White, Francisco ^l   Gwako, Edwins Laban ^m   Henrich, Natalie ⁿ   Hill, Kim ^o   Lesorogol, Carolyn ^p   Patton, John Q ^q   Marlowe, Frank W ^r   Tracer, David P ^s   Ziker, John ^t   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^f TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^h Professor of Biology and Faculty Chair of Global Education   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

^j UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^k CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^l INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO AUTÓNOMO DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^m GUILFORD COLLEGE   (United States)

ⁿ CENTRE FOR HEALTH EVALUATION AND OUTCOME SCIENCES   (Canada)

^o ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^p WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^q CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^r UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^s UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^t BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; DEMOGRAPHY; FERTILITY; GENETIC PROCEDURES; HUMAN; INCOME; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; LETTER; MARKET; MIGRATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL NETWORK; TRUST;

EID: 84862980983     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1204165109     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. van Hoorn A (2012) Cross-cultural experiments are more useful when explanans and explanandum are separated. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:E1329.
2. Henrich J, et al. (2012) Culture does account for variation in game behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:E32-E33.
3. Fehr E, Hoff K (2011) Introduction: Tastes, castes and culture: The influence of society on preferences. Econ J 121:F396-F412.
4. Henrich N, Henrich J (2007) Why Humans Cooperate: A Cultural and Evolutionary Explanation (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
5. Lesorogol CK (2007) Bringing norms in - the role of context in experimental dictator games. Curr Anthropol 48:920-926.
6. Al-Ubaydli O, Houser D, Nye J, Paganelli MP, Pan X (2011) The Causal Effect of Market Participation on Trust: An Experimental Investigation Using Randomized Control (George Mason University, Fairfax, VA).