Auditory-cognitive interactions underlying interaural asymmetry in an adult listener: A case study

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 124-134

  Davis, Tara ^a   Martin, Jeffrey ^b   Jerger, James ^b   Greenwald, Ralf ^c   Mehta, Jyutika ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^c CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potential; Auditory processing disorder; Dichotic listening; Event related potential; Hearing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CASE REPORT; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; DICHOTIC LISTENING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; WECHSLER INTELLIGENCE SCALE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDIOMETRY, SPEECH; AUDITORY PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; WECHSLER SCALES;

EID: 84862969003     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.615761     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Annett M. 1970. Classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol, 61, 303-321.
2. Debener S., Makeig S., Delorme A. & Engel A. 2005. What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 22, 309-321. (Pubitemid 40269240)
3. Delorme A., Fernsler T., Serby H. & Makeig S. 2006. EEGLAB Tutorial. Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego. Retrieved on January 15, 2007 from http://www.sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/eeglabdocs.html.
4. Delorme A., Makeig S. et al. 2002. EEGLAB: Matlab Toolbox for Electro-physiological Research, v.6.03b. Swartz Center for Computational Neu-roscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego. Retrieved June 3, 2008 from http://www.sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab.
5. Delorme A. & Makeig S. 2004. EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. J Neurosci Methods, 134, 9-21.
6. Hugdahl K. 2003. Dichotic listening: An experimental tool in clinical neu-ropsychology. In: K. Hugdahl (ed.), Experimental Methods in Neuropsy-chology. Norwell, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishing, pp. 29-46.
7. Hugdahl K., Law L., Kyllingsbaek S., Bronnick K., Gade A. et al. 2000. Effects of attention on dichotic listening: A 15O-PET study. Hum Brain Mapp, 10, 87-97. (Pubitemid 30390292)
8. J ä ncke L., Mirzazade S. & Shah N. 1999. Attention modulates activity in the primary and the secondary auditory cortex: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects. Neurosci Lett, 266, 125-128. (Pubitemid 29227340)
9. Jasper H. 1958. Report to the Committee on Methods of Clinical Examination in Electroencephalography. Appendix: The ten-twenty system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 10, 371-375.
10. Jerger J. 2001. Asymmetry in auditory function in elderly persons. Semin Hear, 22, 255-268. (Pubitemid 32757979)
11. Jerger J. Chmiel R., Allen J. & Wilson A. 1994. Effects of age and gender on dichotic sentences identification. Ear Hear, 15, 274-286. (Pubitemid 24258174)
12. Jerger J. & Lew H. 2004. Principles and clinical applications of auditory evoked potentials in the geriatric population. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 15, 235-250. (Pubitemid 38210041)
13. Jerger J. & Martin J. 2006. Dichotic listening tests in the assessment of auditory processing disorders. Audiol Med, 4, 25-34.
14. Jung T., Makeig S., Westerfield M., Townsend J., Courchesne E. et al. 2001. Analysis and visualization of single-trial event-related potentials. Hum Brain Mapp, 14, 166-185. (Pubitemid 33032349)
15. Kimura D. 1961. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Can J Psychol, 15, 166-171.
16. Kimura D. 1967. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3, 163-178.
17. Martin J., Jerger J. & Mehta J. 2007. Divided-attention and directed-attention listening modes in children with dichotic deficits: An event-related potential study. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 34-53. (Pubitemid 46165191)
18. McCoy S., Tun P., Cox L., Colangelo M., Stewart R. et al. 2005. Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults'memory for speech. Q J Exp Psychol A, 58, 22-33. (Pubitemid 40166893)
19. Mehta J., Jerger S., Jerger J. & Martin J. 2009. Electrophysiological correlates of word comprehension: Event-related potentials (ERP) and independent component analysis. Int J Audiol, 48, 1-11.
20. Milner B., Taylor L. & Sperry R. 1968. Lateralized suppression of dichoti-cally presented digits after commissural section in man. Science, 161, 184-186.
21. O'Leary D., Andreasen N., Hurtig R., Rogers M. & Kirchner P. 1996. A positron emission tomography study of binaurally and dichotically presented stimuli: Effects of level of language and directed attention. Brain Lang, 53, 20-39. (Pubitemid 26133749)
22. Penner I.K., Schlafli K., Opwis K. & Hugdahl K. 2009. The role of working memory in dichotic-listening studies of auditory laterality. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 31, 959-966.
23. Postle B. 2006. Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience, 139, 23-38.
24. Wechsler D. 1997. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Third Edition. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
25. Westerhausen R. & Hugdahl, K. 2008. The corpus callosum in dichotic listening studies of hemispheric asymmetry: A review of clinical and experimental evidence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 32, 1044-1054.
26. Wingfield A., Tun P. & McCoy S. 2005. Hearing loss in older adulthood: What it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 14, 144-148. (Pubitemid 41311934)