Comparision of utility-based recommendation methods

PACIS 2008 - 12th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Leveraging ICT for Resilient Organizations and Sustainable Growth in the Asia Pacific Region

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Huang, Shiu Li ^a  

^a MING CHUAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Multi Attribute Utility Theory; Radial basis function networks; Recommender systems; SMARTER; Vector Space Model

Indexed keywords

CONTENT-BASED; CONTENT-BASED METHODS; ELICITATION METHODS; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; INFORMATION OVERLOADING; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY FUNCTION; MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY; NOMINAL ATTRIBUTES; NUMERICAL ATTRIBUTES; OVERSPECIALIZATION; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; RECOMMENDATION ACCURACY; RECOMMENDATION METHODS; RESEARCH RESULTS; SMARTER; USER PERCEPTIONS; USER PROBLEMS; UTILITY FUNCTIONS; VECTOR SPACE MODEL; VECTOR SPACE MODELS; WEB ENVIRONMENT;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; RESEARCH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; VECTOR SPACES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 84862965948     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Adomavicius, G. and Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17 (6), 734-749. (Pubitemid 40860454)
2. Balabanovic, M. and Shoham, Y. (1997). Fab: Content-based collaborative recommendation. Communications of the ACM, 40 (3), 66-72.
3. Edwards, W. (1977). How to use multi-attribute utility measurement for social decision making. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, 3 (5), 326-340.
4. Edwards, W. and Barron, H.F. (1994). SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 306-325.
5. Keeny, R. and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Willey & Sons.
6. Kumar, S. (2005). Neural Networks: A Classroom Approach. McGraw-Hill.
7. Laskey, K.B. & Fischer, G.W. (1987). Estimating utility functions in the presence of response error. Management Science, 33 (8), 965-980.
8. Lin, F.-R., Huang, S.-L., and Yang, Y.-C. (2005). Using radial basis function networks to model multi-attribute utility functions. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on e-Business, Las Vegas, USA.
9. Malakooti, B. and Zhou, Y.Q. (1994). Feedforward artificial neural networks for solving discrete multiple criteria decision making problems. Management Science, 40 (11), 1542-1561.
10. Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
11. Pomerol, J.-C. and Barba-Romero, S. (2000). Multicriterion Decision in Management: Principles and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Resnick, P. and Varian, H.R. (1997). Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40 (3), 56-58. (Pubitemid 127441130)
13. Salton, G. (1989). Automatic Text Processing. Addison-Wesley.
14. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Schoemaker, P.J.H. and Waid, C.C. (1982). An experiment comparison of different approaches to determining weights in additive utility models. Management Science, 28 (2), 182-196. (Pubitemid 12523656)
16. Srivastava, J., Connolly, T., and Beach, L.R. (1995). Do rank suffice? A comparison of alternative weighting approaches in value elicitation. Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 63, 112-116.
17. Sun, M., Stam, A., and Steuer, R.E. (1996). Solving multiple objective programming problems using feed-forward artificial neural networks: The interactive FFANN procedure. Management Science, 42 (6), 835-849. (Pubitemid 126577325)
18. Wang, M.S. and Yang, J.S. (1998). A multi-criterion experimental comparison of three multi-attribute weight measurement methods. Journal of Multi-Criterion Decision Analysis, 7, 340-350.
19. Witten, I.H. and Frank, E. (2005). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. 2nd Edition. Morgan Kaufmann.
20. Yamamoto, N., Saito, M., Miyazaki, M., and Koike, H. (2005). Recommendation algorithm focused on individual viewpoints. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Consumer communications and Networking Conference, pp. 5-70, Las Vegas, USA.
21. Yap, C.S., Raman, K.S., and Leong, C.M. (1992). Methods for information system project selection: an experimental study of AHP and SMART. In Proceedings of the 25th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 578-589, Hawaii, USA.