Daxx interacts with and modulates the activity of CREB

Cell Cycle

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 99-108

  Huang, Yen Sung ^a   Chang, Che Chang ^a   Huang, Tien Chi ^a,b   Hsieh, Yung Lin ^a,c   Shih, Hsiu Ming ^a,b,c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDICAL CENTER   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

cAMP responsive element binding protein (CREB); Death associated protein 6 (Daxx); PKA; SUMO interacting motif; Sumoylation; Transcriptional regulation

Indexed keywords

BASIC LEUCINE ZIPPER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; CYCLIC AMP DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; CYCLIC AMP RESPONSIVE ELEMENT BINDING PROTEIN; DAXX PROTEIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; FORSKOLIN; PROTEIN KINASE B; SHORT HAIRPIN RNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; BASIC LEUCINE ZIPPER MOTIF; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GEL MOBILITY SHIFT ASSAY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENE REPRESSION; GENE TARGETING; GROWTH INHIBITION; HYBRID; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MEDIATOR; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REPORTER GENE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; YEAST;

EID: 84862949855     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.11.1.18430     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Johannessen M, Delghandi MP, Moens U. What turns CREB on? Cell Signal 2004; 16:1211-27; PMID:15337521; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.05. 001.
2. Mayr B, Montminy M. Transcriptional regulation by the phosphorylation-dependent factor CREB. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001; 2:599-609; PMID:11483993; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35085068.
3. Shaywitz AJ, Greenberg ME. CREB: a stimulus-induced transcription factor activated by a diverse array of extracellular signals. Annu Rev Biochem 1999; 68:821-61; PMID:10872467; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.821.
4. Arias J, Alberts AS, Brindle P, Claret FX, Smeal T, Karin M, et al. Activation of cAMP and mitogen responsive genes relies on a common nuclear factor. Nature 1994; 370:226-9; PMID:8028671; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ 370226a0.
5. Chrivia JC, Kwok RP, Lamb N, Hagiwara M, Montminy MR, Goodman RH. Phosphorylated CREB binds specifically to the nuclear protein CBP. Nature 1993; 365:855-9; PMID:8413673; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/365855a0.
6. Kee BL, Arias J, Montminy MR. Adaptor-mediated recruitment of RNA polymerase II to a signal-dependent activator. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:2373-5; PMID:8576192; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.5.2373.
7. Korzus E, Torchia J, Rose DW, Xu L, Kurokawa R, McInerney EM, et al. Transcription factor-specific requirements for coactivators and their acetyltransferase functions. Science 1998; 279:703-7; PMID:9445475; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5351.703.
8. Nakajima T, Uchida C, Anderson SF, Parvin JD, Montminy M. Analysis of a cAMP-responsive activator reveals a two-component mechanism for transcriptional induction via signal-dependent factors. Genes Dev 1997; 11:738-47; PMID:9087428; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.6.738.
9. Lindsay CR, Giovinazzi S, Ishov AM. Daxx is a predominately nuclear protein that does not translocate to the cytoplasm in response to cell stress. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:1544-51; PMID:19372739; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.10. 8379.
10. Hollenbach AD, McPherson CJ, Mientjes EJ, Iyengar R, Grosveld G. Daxx and histone deacetylase II associate with chromatin through an interaction with core histones and the chromatin-associated protein Dek. J Cell Sci 2002; 115:3319-30; PMID:12140263.
11. Li H, Leo C, Zhu J, Wu X, O'Neil J, Park EJ, et al. Sequestration and inhibition of Daxx-mediated transcriptional repression by PML. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:1784-96; PMID:10669754; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.5.1784-96. 2000.
12. Muromoto R, Sugiyama K, Takachi A, Imoto S, Sato N, Yamamoto T, et al. Physical and functional interactions between Daxx and DNA methyltransferase 1-associated protein, DMAP1. J Immunol 2004; 172:2985-93; PMID:14978102.
13. Puto LA, Reed JC. Daxx represses RelB target promoters via DNA methyltransferase recruitment and DNA hypermethylation. Genes Dev 2008; 22:998-1010; PMID:18413714; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1632208.
14. Ishov AM, Vladimirova OV, Maul GG. Heterochromatin and ND10 are cell cycle regulated and phosphorylation-dependent alternate nuclear sites of the transcription repressor Daxx and SWI/SNF protein ATRX. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:3807-20; PMID:15252119; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01230.
15. Tang J, Wu S, Liu H, Stratt R, Barak OG, Shiekhattar R, et al. A novel transcription regulatory complex containing death domain-associated protein and the ATR-X syndrome protein. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:20369-77; PMID:14990586; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M401321200.
16. Xue Y, Gibbons R, Yan Z, Yang D, McDowell TL, Sechi S, et al. The ATRX syndrome protein forms a chromatin-remodeling complex with Daxx and localizes in promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:10635-40; PMID:12953102; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1937626100.
17. Shih HM, Chang CC, Kuo HY, Lin DY. Daxx mediates SUMO-dependent transcriptional control and subnuclear compartmentalization. Biochem Soc Trans 2007; 35:1397-400; PMID:18031230; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0351397.
18. Lin DY, Fang HI, Ma AH, Huang YS, Pu YS, Jenster G, et al. Negative modulation of androgen receptor transcriptional activity by daxx. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:10529-41; PMID:15572661; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.24.10529-41. 2004.
19. Chang CC, Lin DY, Fang HI, Chen RH, Shih HM. Daxx mediates the small ubiquitin-like modifier-dependent transcriptional repression of Smad4. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:10164-73; PMID:15637079; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M409161200.
20. Lin DY, Huang YS, Jeng JC, Kuo HY, Chang CC, Chao TT, et al. Role of SUMO-Interacting Motif in Daxx SUMO Modification, Subnuclear Localization and Repression of Sumoylated Transcription Factors. Mol Cell 2006; 24:341-54; PMID:17081986; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.10.019.
21. Kuo HY, Chang CC, Jeng JC, Hu HM, Lin DY, Maul GG, et al. SUMO modification negatively modulates the transcriptional activity of CREB-binding protein via the recruitment of Daxx. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:16973-8; PMID:16287980; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504460102.
22. Santiago A, Godsey AC, Hossain J, Zhao LY, Liao D. Identification of two independent SUMO-interacting motifs in Daxx: evolutionary conservation from Drosophila to humans and their biochemical functions. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:76-87; PMID:19106612; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.1.7493.
23. Ecsedy JA, Michaelson JS, Leder P. Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 1 modulates Daxx localization, phosphorylation and transcriptional activity. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:950-60; PMID:12529400; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23. 3.950-60.2003.
24. Walton KM, Rehfuss RP, Chrivia JC, Lochner JE, Goodman RH. A dominant repressor of cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate (cAMP)-regulated enhancer-binding protein activity inhibits the cAMP-mediated induction of the somatostatin promoter in vivo. Mol Endocrinol 1992; 6:647-55.
25. Tullai JW, Chen J, Schaffer ME, Kamenetsky E, Kasif S, Cooper GM. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 represses cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB)-targeted immediate early genes in quiescent cells. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:9482-91; PMID:17277356; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M700067200.
26. Comerford KM, Leonard MO, Karhausen J, Carey R, Colgan SP, Taylor CT. Small ubiquitin-related modifier-1 modification mediates resolution of CREB-dependent responses to hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:986-91; PMID:12552083; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0337412100.
27. Dwarki VJ, Montminy M, Verma IM. Both the basic region and the 'leucine zipper' domain of the cyclic AMP response element binding (CREB) protein are essential for transcriptional activation. EMBO J 1990; 9:225-32; PMID:2136830.
28. Canettieri G, Morantte I, Guzman E, Asahara H, Herzig S, Anderson SD, et al. Attenuation of a phosphorylation-dependent activator by an HDAC-PP1 complex. Nat Struct Biol 2003; 10:175-81; PMID:12567184; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nsb895.
29. Conkright MD, Canettieri G, Screaton R, Guzman E, Miraglia L, Hogenesch JB, et al. TORCs: transducers of regulated CREB activity. Mol Cell 2003; 12:413-23; PMID:14536081; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2003.08.013.
30. Williams JS, Andrisani OM. The hepatitis B virus X protein targets the basic region-leucine zipper domain of CREB. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:3819-23; PMID:7731990; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.9.3819.
31. Yin MJ, Paulssen EJ, Seeler JS, Gaynor RB. Protein domains involved in both in vivo and in vitro interactions between human T-cell leukemia virus type I tax and CREB. J Virol 1995; 69:3420-32; PMID:7745688.
32. Reddy UR, Basu A, Bannerman P, Ikegaki N, Reddy CD, Pleasure D. ZPK inhibits PKA induced transcriptional activation by CREB and blocks retinoic acid induced neuronal differentiation. Oncogene 1999; 18:4474-84; PMID:10442638; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1202813.
33. Li Z, Day CP, Yang JY, Tsai WB, Lozano G, Shih HM, et al. Adenoviral E1A targets Mdm4 to stabilize tumor suppressor p53. Cancer Res 2004; 64:9080-5; PMID:15604276; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2419.
34. Lin DY, Shih HM. Essential role of the 58-kDa microspherule protein in the modulation of Daxx-dependent transcriptional repression as revealed by nucleolar sequestration. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:25446-56; PMID:11948183; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M200633200.
35. Grimes CA, Jope RS. CREB DNA binding activity is inhibited by glycogen synthase kinase-3beta and facilitated by lithium. J Neurochem 2001; 78:1219-32; PMID:11579131; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00495.x.