|
Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 959-965
|
A double-blind randomized controlled comparison of apddr-0901, a novel cosmeceutical formulation, and 0.1% adapalene gel in the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris
|
Author keywords
Acne vulgaris; Adapalene; Cosmeceutical; Hexamidine diisethionate; Retinol; Rose extract
|
Indexed keywords
ACLENE GEL;
ADAPALENE;
APDDR 0901;
COSMETIC;
HEXAMIDINE ISETIONATE;
PLANT EXTRACT;
RETINOL;
ROSE EXTRACT;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
ACNE VULGARIS;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
BURNING SENSATION;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
DRUG EFFICACY;
DRUG SAFETY;
DRUG TOLERABILITY;
ERYTHEMA;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MILD TO MODERATE ACNE VULGARIS;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
PRICKING;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
ROSE;
SCALING;
SELF EVALUATION;
SIDE EFFECT;
SKIN IRRITATION;
ACNE VULGARIS;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
BENZAMIDINES;
COSMETICS;
DERMATOLOGIC AGENTS;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
FEMALE;
GELS;
HUMANS;
MALE;
NAPHTHALENES;
PLANT EXTRACTS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VITAMIN A;
YOUNG ADULT;
|
EID: 84862942905
PISSN: 11671122
EISSN: 19524013
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2011.1546 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (13)
|
References (15)
|