Construction of a chemical ranking system of soil pollution substances for screening of priority soil contaminants in Korea

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 184, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 2193-2204

  Jeong, Seung Woo ^a   An, Youn Joo ^b  

^a Kunsan National University   (South Korea)

^b Konkuk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Chemical ranking and scoring (CRS); Ecological toxicity; Exposure; Human toxicity; Soil contaminant; Soil quality guideline; Toxic release inventory

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL TOXICITY; EXPOSURE; HUMAN TOXICITY; SOIL CONTAMINANTS; SOIL QUALITY; TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORIES;

CADMIUM; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONTAMINATION; IMPURITIES; PHENOLS; QUALITY CONTROL; SOIL POLLUTION; TOXICITY;

SOILS;

AROMATIC COMPOUND; CADMIUM; CHEMICAL COMPOUND; DIELDRIN; GROUND WATER; PENTACHLOROPHENOL; PESTICIDE; PHENOL; TERT BUTYL METHYL ETHER;

ALGORITHM; ECOTOXICOLOGY; PARTITION COEFFICIENT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL QUALITY; TOXIC SUBSTANCE; TOXICITY;

ARTICLE; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; KOREA; POLLUTION TRANSPORT; SCORING SYSTEM; SKIN TOXICITY; SOIL POLLUTANT; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL QUALITY;

CHEMICAL HAZARD RELEASE; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; SOIL POLLUTANTS;

KOREA;

EID: 84862906822     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-2109-4     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. California EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2005). Use of California human health screening levels in evaluation of contaminated properties. Sacramento: EPA.
2. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) (2006a). Canadian soil quality guidelines for the protection of environment and human health. Winnipeg: CCME.
3. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) (2006b). A Protocol for the derivation of environmental and human health soil quality guidelines. Winnipeg: CCME.
4. Danish Environmental ProtectionAgency (DEPA) (2002). Guidelines on remediation of contaminated sites. Copenhagen: DEPA.
5. Environment Agency (EA) (2002). Assessment of risks to human health from land contamination: An overview of the development of soil guideline values and related research. Bristol: EA.
6. European Chemical Substances Information System (ESIS) (2008). http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/esis/index. php?PGM=ein&DEPUIS=autre.
7. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (FMENCNS) (1999). Federal soil protection and contaminated sites ordinance. Germany: FMENCNS.
8. Hansen, B. G., Van Haelst, A. G, Van Leeuwen, K, & Van der Zandt, P. (1999). Priority setting for existing chemicals: European Union risk ranking method. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18(4), 772-779.
9. Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB) (2008). http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/ cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB.
10. Illinois EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2007). Soil remediation objectives for industrial/commercial properties/residential Properties. Springfield: EPA.
11. Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of Contaminated Land (ICRCL) (1987). Guidance on the assessment and redevelopment of contaminated land. Surrey: ICRCL.
12. Korean Release Prevention Research Centre (KCPRC) (2008). Chemical release database. http://www.ceicinfo. or.kr/data/list11.asp.
13. Louisiana DEQ (Department of Environmental Quality) (2003). Underground storage tank closure/changein-service guidance document. Surveillance Division. Baton Rouge: DEQ.
14. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM) (2000). Circular on target values and intervention values for soil remediation. Hague: VROM.
15. Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan (2005). Soil contamination countermeasures. Tokyo: Ministry Of The Environment Government Of Japan.
16. Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (2002). Risk evaluation procedures for voluntary cleanup and redevelopment of brownf ield sites. Jackson: Mississippi Department Of Environmental Quality.
17. Mitchell, R. R, Summer, C. L., Blonde, S. A., Bush, D. B., Hurlburt, G. K, Snyder E. M., et al. (2002). SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the NorthAmerican Great Lakes-resulting chemical scores and rankings. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 8(3), 537-557.
18. National Environmental Protection Council (NEPC) (1999). Schedule B(1) Guideline on the Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater. Adelaide: NEPC Service Corporation.
19. Norwegian Pollution Control Authority (NPCA) (1999). Guidelines for the risk assessment of contaminated sites. Oslo:NPCA.
20. Snyder, E. M., Snyder, S. A., Giesy, J. P., Blonde, S. A., Hurlburt, G. K., Summer, C. L., et al. (2000). SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances for the North AmericanGreat Lakes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 7(1), 52-61.
21. State of Delaware (2006). Part 261 - Identif ication and listing of hazardous waste. Dover: Division of Air and Waste Management.
22. State of Florida (1998). Guidelines for the management of recovered screen material from C&D debris recycling facilities in Florida. Tallahassee: Department of Environmental Protection.
23. State of Maryland (2000). Cleanup standards for soil and groundwater. Baltimore: Department of the Environment.
24. State of Massachusetts (2006). Final Amendments Massachusetts Contingency Plan. Boston: Department of Environmental Protection.
25. State of New Jersey (1999). Soil cleanup criteria. Trenton: Department of Environmental Protection.
26. State of New York (2006). Development of soil cleanup objectives technical support document. Albany: New York State Department of Health.
27. State of Oregon (1998). Guidance for ecological risk assessment: Levels I, II, III, IV. Portland, Oregon, USA: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.
28. Swartjes, F. A. (1999). Risk-based assessment of soil and groundwater quality in the Netherlands: Standards and remediation urgency. Risk Analysis, 19(6), 1235-1249.
29. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL) (1998). Derivation of trigger and clean up values for inorganic pollutants in the soil. Berne: SAEFL.
30. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL) (2001). Guideline reuse of excavated soils. Berne: SAEFL.
31. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) (2001). Guidance for conducting ecological risk assessments at remediation sites in Texas. Austin: Texas Risk Reduction Program.
32. US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (US CSHIB) (2008). Complete investigations. http://www. csb.gov/.
33. US Department of Health and Human Services (USDHH) (2005). 2005 CERCLA priority list of hazardous substances that will be the subject of toxicological profiles and support document, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Atlanta: USDHH.
34. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1994). Chemical hazard evaluation for management Strategies. Washington DC: Office of Research and Development.
35. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1996a). Soil screening guidance: User's guide. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
36. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1996b). Soil screening guide: Technical documents. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
37. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2002). Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for Superfund sites. Washington DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
38. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2007). Estimation programs interface suite for Microsoft Windows, v3.20. Washington, DC: Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
39. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2008). ECOTOX database. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/.
40. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) (2006). Waste Regulations Chapter 160. Richmond: Voluntary Remediation Program.