IT solutions for privacy protection in biobanking

Public Health Genomics

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 254-262

  Eder, J ^a   Gottweis, H ^b,d   Zatloukal, K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^d Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Biobank donors; Biobanks; Personal data; Privacy concerns; Research needs

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL;

ARTICLE; BIOBANK; DATA BASE; ETHICS; EUROPE; EXPECTATION; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT RIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; PUBLIC OPINION;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SECURITY; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; PRIVACY;

EID: 84862886630     PISSN: 16624246     EISSN: 16628063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000336663     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Yuille M, van Ommen GJ, Bréchot C, Cambon- Thomsen A, Dagher G, Landegren U, Litton JE, Pasterk M, Peltonen L, Taussig M, Wichmann HE, Zatloukal K: Biobanking for Europe. Brief Bioinform 2008; 9: 14-24.
2. Gaskell G, Gottweis H: Biobanks need publicity. Nature 2011; 471: 159-160.
3. Gaskell G, et al: Europeans and biotechnology in 2010. Winds of change? European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/public-opinion/archives/ebs/ebs-341- winds-en.pdf.
4. Gottweis H, Gaskell G, Starkbaum J: Connecting the public with biobank research: Reciprocity matters. Nat Rev Genet 2011; 12: 738-739.
5. Eder J, Dabringer C, Schicho M, Stark K: Information systems for federated biobanks. TLDKS 2009; 1: 156-190.
6. Wichmann HE, Kuhn K, Waldenberger M, Schmelcher D, Schuffenhauer S, Meitinger T, Wurst S, Lamla G, Fortier I, Burton P, Peltonen L, Perola M, Metspalu A, Riegman P, Landegren U, Taussig M, Litton JE, Fransson M, Eder J, Cambon-Thomsen A, Bovenberg J, Dagher G, Van Ommen GJ, Griffith M, Yuille M, Zatloukal K: Comprehensive catalog of European biobanks. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29: 795-797.
7. Denning DE, Denning PJ, Schwartz MD: The tracker. A threat to statistical database security. ACM T Database Syst 1979; 4: 75-95.
8. Denning DE, Schlörer J: A fast procedure for finding a tracker in a statistical database. ACM T Database Syst 1980; 5: 88-102. (Pubitemid 10485374)
9. Adam NR, Wortmann JC: Security-control methods for statistical databases: A comparative study. ACM Comput Surv 1989; 21: 515-556.
10. Sweeney L: Achieving k-anonymity privacy protection using generalization and suppression. Int J Uncertain Fuzz 2002; 10: 571-588. (Pubitemid 35384858)
11. Machanavajjhala A, Kifer D, Gehrke J, Venkitasubramaniam M: L-diversity: Privacy beyond k-anonymity. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data DOI: 10.1145/1217299.1217302.
12. Matthews GJ, Harel O: Data confidentiality: A review of methods for statistical disclosure limitation and methods for assessing privacy. Statist Surv 2011; 5: 1-29.
13. Li F, Zou X, Liu P, Chen JY: New threats to health data privacy. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12(suppl 12):S7.
14. Stark K, Eder J, Zatloukal K: Priority-based k-anonymity accomplished by weighted generalisation structures. Springer LNCS 2006; 4081: 394-404 (Pubitemid 44811913)
15. Stark K, Eder J, Zatloukal K: Achieving k-anonymity in DataMarts used for gene expressions exploitation. JIB DOI: 10.2390/biecoll-jib-2007-58.