A new semiempirical codon substitution model based on principal component analysis of mammalian sequences

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 271-277

  Zoller, Stefan ^a,b   Schneider, Adrian ^c  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Codon substitutionmodel; Markov model; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CODON; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE SEQUENCE; MAMMAL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATION;

ANIMALS; CODON; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MAMMALS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

MAMMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84862886095     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr198     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Burnham K, Anderson D. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-Theoretic approach. New York: Springer.
2. Doron-Faigenboim A, Pupko T. 2007. A combined empirical and mechanistic codon model.Mol Biol Evol. 24:388-397. (Pubitemid 46204372)
3. Drummond A, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 7:214.
4. Goldman N, Yang Z. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 11: 725-736.
5. Guindon SJ, Dufayard J, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 59:307-321.
6. Hurvich C, Tsai C. 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297-307.
7. Ikemura T. 1985. Codonusage and trna content inunicellular andmulticellular organisms.Mol Biol Evol. 2:13-34. (Pubitemid 15152046)
8. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HM, editor. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic Press. p. 21-132.
9. Kosiol C, Holmes I, Goldman N. 2007. An empirical codon model for protein sequence evolution.Mol Biol Evol. 24:1464-1479. (Pubitemid 47216596)
10. Muse S, Gaut B. 1994. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol Biol Evol. 11: 715-724. (Pubitemid 24274880)
11. Nielsen R, Yang Z. 1998. Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the hiv-1 envelope gene. Genetics 148:929-936. (Pubitemid 28169008)
12. Schneider A, Cannarozzi G, Gonnet G. 2005. Empirical codon substitution matrix. BMC Bioinformatics 6:134.
13. Sugiura N. 1978. Further analysis of the data by Akaike's information criterion and the finite corrections. Commun Stat TheoryMethods 7:13-26.
14. Whelan S, de Bakker P, Goldman N. 2003. Pandit: A database of protein and associated nucleotide domains with inferred trees. Bioinformatics 19:1556-1563. (Pubitemid 37038872)
15. Yang Z. 1998. Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution.Mol Biol Evol. 15: 568-573. (Pubitemid 28194621)
16. Zanetti MS. 2010. Markovian codon models of evolution for phylogeny inference [master's thesis]. ETH Zurich. Zoller S, Schneider A. 2010. Empirical analysis of the most relevant parameters of codon substitution models. J Mol Evol. 70: 605-612.