Subsequent risks for cervical precancer and cancer in women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions unconfirmed by colposcopy-directed biopsy: Results from a multicenter, prospective, cohort study

International Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 233-239

  Matsumoto, Koji ^a   Hirai, Yasuo ^b   Furuta, Reiko ^c   Takatsuka, Naoyoshi ^d   Oki, Akinori ^a   Yasugi, Toshiharu ^e   Maeda, Hiroo ^f   Mitsuhashi, Akira ^g   Fujii, Takuma ^h   Kawana, Kei ^e   Iwasaka, Tsuyoshi ⁱ   Yaegashi, Nobuo ^j   Watanabe, Yoh ^k   Nagai, Yutaka ^l   Kitagawa, Tomoyuki ^c   Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b CANCER INSTITUTE HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c CANCER INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^d GIFU UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^f SAITAMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^g CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^h KEIO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

ⁱ SAGA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^j TOHOKU UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^k KINKI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^l UNIVERSITY OF THE RYUKYUS   (Japan)

more..

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Colposcopy; Human papillomavirus; Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SMOKING; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOPSY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84862862221     PISSN: 13419625     EISSN: 14377772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-011-0280-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R et al (2002) The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 287:2114-2119
2. Cox JT, Schiffman M, Solomon D et al (2003) Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1406-1412
3. Wentzensen N, Schiffman M, Dunn ST et al (2009) Grading the severity of cervical neoplasia based on combined histopathology, cytopathology, and HPV genotype distribution among 1,700 women referred to colposcopy in Oklahoma. Int J Cancer 124:964-969
4. Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ et al (2007) 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:346-355
5. Matsumoto K, Oki A, Furuta R et al (2011) Predicting the progression of cervical precursor lesions by human papillomavirus genotyping: a prospective cohort study. Int J Cancer 128: 2898-2910
6. Matsumoto K, Oki A, Furuta R et al (2010) Tobacco smoking and regression of low-grade cervical abnormalities. Cancer Sci 101:2065-2073
7. Castle PE, Stoler MH, Solomon D et al (2007) The relationship of community biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to the quality control pathology-reviewed diagnoses: an ALTS report. Am J Clin Pathol 127:805-815
8. Carreon JD, Sherman ME, Guillén D et al (2007) CIN2 is a much less reproducible and less valid diagnosis than CIN3: results from a histological review of population-based cervical samples. Int J Gynecol Pathol 26:441-446
9. Castle PE, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM et al (2009) Evidence for frequent regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 2. Obstet Gynecol 113:18-25
10. Yoshikawa H, Kawana T, Kitagawa K et al (1991) Detection and typing of multiple genital human papillomaviruses by DNA amplification with consensus primers. Jpn J Cancer Res 82:524-531
11. Nagano H, Yoshikawa H, Kawana T et al (1996) Association of multiple human papillomavirus types with vulvar neoplasias. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 22:1-8
12. Yamamoto T, Moji K, Kusano Y et al (1998) Trend in Chlamydia trachomatis infection among pregnant women in the past ten years in Japan: significance of Chlamydia trachomatis seroprev-alence. Sex Transm Dis 25:516-521
13. Clifford GM, Smith JS, Aguado T et al (2003) Comparison of HPV type distribution in high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 89:101-105
14. International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer, Appleby P, Beral V et al (2006) Carcinoma of the cervix and tobacco smoking: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 13,541 women with carcinoma of the cervix and 23,017 women without carcinoma of the cervix from 23 epide-miological studies. Int J Cancer 118:1481-1495
15. International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer (2006) Cervical carcinoma and reproductive factors: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 16,563 women with cervical carcinoma and 33,542 women without cervical carcinoma from 25 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer 119: 1108-1124
16. Smith JS, Bosetti C, Munoz N et al (2004) Chlamydia tracho-matis and invasive cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of the IARC multicentric case-control study. Int J Cancer 111:431-439
17. Nobbenhuis MA, Walboomers JM, Helmerhorst TJ et al (1999) Relation of human papillomavirus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening: a prospective study. Lancet 354:20-25
18. Pretorius RG, Peterson P, Azizi F et al (2006) Subsequent risk and presentation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or cancer after a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN 1 or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1260-1265
19. Jeronimo J, Schiffman M (2006) Colposcopy at a crossroads. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:349-353
20. Gage JC, Hanson VW, Abbey K et al (2006) Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 108: 264-272
21. Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Belinson JL et al (2004) Colposcopi-cally directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:430-434
22. Gage JC, Duggan MA, Nation JG et al (2010) Detection of cervical cancer and its precursors by endocervical curettage in 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:481.e1-481.e9
23. Stoler MH, Schiffman M, Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Triage Study (ALTS) Group et al (2001) Interobserver repro-ducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. JAMA 285:1500-1505
24. Heatley MK (2001) The prognosis in cervical epithelial changes of uncertain significance is similar to that of cervical intraepi-thelial neoplasia grade 1. J Clin Pathol 54:474-475