Forensic case formulation

International Journal of Forensic Mental Health

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 118-126

  Hart, Stephen ^a   Sturmey, Peter ^b   Logan, Caroline ^c   McMurran, Mary ^d  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Forensic assessment; Forensic treatment; Formulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862852913     PISSN: 14999013     EISSN: 19329903     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2011.577137     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Allon, R., Gauthier, J., Doyle, A. B., & Hutcheon, D. (2004). A model curriculum for a Doctor of Psychology (Psy.D.) programme: A report to the Board of Directors of the Canadian Psychological Association. Retrieved July 15, 2010, from http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/userfiles/Documents/publications/Psy%20D%20Model%20Curriculum%20final%202.pdf
2. American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology Inc. (2010). Psychiatry and neurology core competencies. Downloaded July 15, 2010, from http://www.abpn.com/downloads/corecompoutlines/core psychneurov4.1.pdf
3. American Psychological Association Task Force on theAssessment of Competence in Professional Psychology. (2006). APA Task Force on the Assessment of Competence in Professional Psychology: Final report. Retrieved July 15, 2010, from http://www.apa.org/ed/resources/competencyrevised.pdf
4. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct, 4th ed. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
5. Australian Psychological Society. (2006). APS College of Clinical Psychologists course approval guidelines. Retrieved July 15, 2010, from http://www.apac.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/clinicalguidelines 2006.pdf
6. Bentall, R. P., & Taylor, J. L. (2006). Psychological processes and paranoia: Implications for forensic behavioural science. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24, 277–294.
7. Bonta, J., Law, M., & Hanson, K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: Ameta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 123–142.
8. British Psychological Society Professional Practice Board (2008). Generic professional practice guidelines, 2nd ed. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
9. Bruner, J. S. (1985). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2010). Limitations of diagnostic precision and predictive utility in the individual case: A challenge for forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 259–274.
11. Corrie, S., & Lane, D. A. (2010). Constructing stories, telling tales: A guide to formulation in applied psychology. London: Karnac Books.
12. Daffern, M., Howells, K., & Ogloff, J (2007). What’s the point? Towards a methodology for assessing the function of psychiatric inpatient aggression. Behaviour, Research and Therapy, 45, 101–111.
13. Daffern, M., Jones, L., & Shine, J. (2011). Offence Paralleling Behaviour: A case formulation approach to offender assessment and intervention. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
14. Davidson, K. (2006). Cognitive formulation in personality disorder. In N. Tarrier (Ed.), Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: The treatment of challenging and complex cases (pp. 216–237). London: Routledge.
15. Doyle, M., & Dolan, M. (2002). Violence risk assessment: Combining actuarial and clinical information to structure clinical judgements for the formulation and management of risk. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 9, 649–657.
16. Dudley, R., Park, I., James, I., & Dodgson, G. (2010). Rate of agreement between clinicians on the content of a cognitive formulation of delusional beliefs: The effect of quantifications and experience. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38, 185–200.
17. Duggan, C., & Howard, R. (2009). The functional link between personality disorder and violence: A critical appraisal. In M. McMurran and R. Howard (Eds.), Personality, personality disorder, and violence (pp. 19–37). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
18. Eells, T. D. (Ed.). (2007a). Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford.
19. Eells, T.D. (2007b).History and current status of psychotherapy case formulation. In T. D. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation, 2nd ed. (pp. 3–32). New York: Guilford.
20. Eells, T. D., & Lombart, K. G. (2004). Case formulation: Determining the focus in brief dynamic psychotherapy. In D. P. Charman (Ed.), Core processes in brief psychodynamic psychotherapy (pp. 119–144).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Eells, T. D., & Lombart, K. G. (in press). Theoretical and evidencebased approaches to case formulation. In P. Sturmey and M. Mc- Murran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation. Chichester, UK: Wiley- Blackwell.
22. Fouad, N. A., Grus, C. L., Hatcher, R. L., Kaslow, N. J., Hutchings, P. S., Madson, M., Collins, F. L., Jr., & Crossman, R. (2009). Competency benchmarks: Amodel for the understanding andmeasuring of competence in professional psychology across training levels. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4, S5–S26.
23. Ghaderi, A. (2006). Does individualization matter? A randomized trial of standardized (focused) versus individualized (broad) cognitive behavior therapy for bulimia nervosa. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 273–288.
24. Ghaderi, A. (in press). Does case formulation make a difference to treatment outcome? In P. Sturmey and M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
25. Haig, B. D. (2008). Précis of “An Abductive Theory of Scientific Method.” Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 1019–1022.
26. Harman, G. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review, 74, 88–95.
27. Hart, S. D. (2003). Violence risk assessment: An anchored narrative approach. In M. Vanderhallen, G. Vervaeke, P. J. Van Koppen, and J. Goethals (Eds.), Much ado about crime: Chapters on psychology and law (pp. 209–230). Brussels: Uitgeverij Politeia NV.
28. Hart, S.D., & Logan, C. (in press). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In P. Sturmey and M. McMurran (Eds.). Forensic case formulation. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
29. Haynes, S. N. (1992). Models of causality in psychopathology. New York: Macmillan
30. Haynes, S. N., & O’Brien W. O. (2000). Principles of behavioral assessment: A functional approach to psychological assessment. New York: Plenum/Kluwer.
31. Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (Eds). (2006). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems. London: Routledge.
32. Jones, L. (2004). Offence Paralleling Behaviour (OPB) as a framework for assessment and interventions with offenders. In A. Needs and G. Towl (Eds.), Applying psychology to forensic practice (pp. 34–63). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
33. Josephson, J. R. (1996). Conceptual analysis of abduction. In J. R. Josephson and S. G. Josephson (Eds.), Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology (pp. 5–30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Kendjelic, E. M., & Eells, T. D. (2007). Generic psychotherapy case formulation training improves formulation quality. Psychotherapy, 44, 66–77.
35. Kuyken, W. (2006). Evidence-based case formulation: Is the emperor clothed? In N. Tarrier (Ed.), Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: The treatment of challenging and complex clinical cases (pp.12–35). London: Brunner-Routledge.
36. Kuyken, W., Fothergill, M., Musa, C. D., & Chadwick, P. (2005). The reliability and quality of cognitive case formulation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1187–1201.
37. Lewis, G., & Doyle, M. (2009). Risk formulation: What are we doing and why? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8, 286–292.
38. Logan, C., & Johnstone, L. (2010). Personality disorder and violence: Making the link through risk formulation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 610–633.
39. Logan, C., Nathan, R., & Brown, A. (2011). Formulation in clinical risk assessment and management. In R. W. Whittington and C. Logan (Eds.), Self-harm and violence: Towards best practice in managing risk. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
40. Makridakisa, S., & Taleb, N. (2009). Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability. International Journal of Forecasting, 25, 716–733.
41. McKnight, E. L., Nelson, R. O., Hayes, S. C., & Jarrett, R. B. (1984). Importance of treating individually assessed response classes on the amelioration of depression. Behavior Therapy, 15, 315–335.
42. Mumma, G. H. (2001). Increasing accuracy in clinical decision-making: Towards an integration of nomothetic-aggregate and intraindividualidiographic approaches. Behavior Therapist, 24, 77–94.
43. Mumma, G. H. (2004). Validation of idiosyncratic cognitive schema in cognitive case formulations: An intraindividual idiographic approach. Psychological Assessment, 16, 211–230.
44. Mumma, G. H. (in press). Current issues in case formulation. In P. Sturmey and M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
45. Mumma, G. H., & Mooney, S. R. (2007a). Comparing the validity of alternative cognitive case formulations: A latent variable, multivariate time series approach. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31, 451–481.
46. Mumma, G. H., & Mooney, S. R. (2007b) Incremental validity of cognitions in a clinical case formulation: An intraindividual test in a case example. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 17–28.
47. Mumma, G. H., & Smith, J. L. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral interpersonal scenarios: Inter-formulator reliability and convergent validity. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 203–221.
48. New Zealand Psychologists Board. (2010). Core competencies for the practice of psychology in New Zealand. Wellington, NZ: Author.
49. Niiniluoto, I. (1999). Defending abduction. Philosophy of Science, 66, S436–S451.
50. Orrell, D. (2007). The future of everything: The science of prediction. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.
51. Persons, J. B. (2008). The case formulation approach to cognitive-behavior therapy. New York: Guilford.
52. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In J. A. Hatch and R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 5–23). London: Flamer Press.
53. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. (2002). Curriculum basic training psychiatry. Melbourne: Author
54. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. (2009). Objectives of training in psychiatry. Downloaded July 15, 2010, from http://rcpsc.medical.org/residency/certification/objectives/psychiatrye.pdf
55. Royal College of Psychiatrists. (2009). A competency based curriculum for specialist training in psychiatry: Core module. Downloaded July 15, 2010, from http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/PDF/CoreFeb09.pdf
56. Schulte, D., Künzel, R., Pepping, G., & Schulte-Bahrenberg, T. (1992). Tailor-made versus standardized therapy of phobic patients. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14, 67–92.
57. Smith, A. D., & Taylor, P. J. (1999). Serious sex offending against women by men with schizophrenia: Relationship of illness and psychotic symptoms to offending. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 233–237.
58. Sturmey, P. (Ed.). (2007). Functional analysis in clinical treatment. New York: Academic Press.
59. Sturmey, P. (2009). Varieties of case formulation. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
60. Sturmey, P. & McMurran, M. (Eds.). (2011). Forensic case formulation. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
61. Tarrier, N. (Ed.). (2006). Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: The treatment of challenging and complex clinical cases. London: Brunner Routledge.
62. Ward, T., Vertue, F.M., & Haig, B.D. (1999).Abductive method and clinical assessment in practice. Behaviour Change, 16, 49–63.
63. Weerasekera, P. (1996). Multiperspective case formulation: A step towards treatment integration. Malabar, FL: Krieger
64. Weerasekera, P. (in press).Multiperspective case formulation. In P. Sturmey (Ed.), Clinical case formulation: Varieties of approaches. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
65. Wilson, G. T. (1996). Manual-based treatments: The clinical application of research findings. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 295–314.