Screening for Breast Cancer with Mammography: Current Status and An Overview

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 218-223

  Shetty, Mahesh K ^a,b  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Woman's Hospital of Texas   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Mammography; Screening

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EUROPE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84862851397     PISSN: 09757651     EISSN: 09766952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13193-010-0014-x     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Kamangar F, Dores G, Anderson W (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24(14): 2137-2150.
2. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, GLOBOCAN et al (2002) Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide, IARC CancerBase No 5, version 2. 0. IARC, Lyon, http://www-dep. iarc. fr/globocan/database. htm.
3. Porter PL (2009) Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality. Salud Pública Méx 51(suppl 2): S141-S146.
4. Nandakumar A, Gupta PC, Gangadharan P, Viswesara (2004) Development of an atlas of cancer in India. First All India Report-2001-2002. 1. 242-243.
5. Tabar L, Dean PB, Kaufman CA, Duffy SW, Chen H-H. A new Era in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America, 9, No 2, 233-239.
6. Tabár L, Fagerberg CJG, Gad A et al (1985) Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: randomized trial from the breast cancer screening working group of the Swedish national board of health and welfare. Lancet 1: 829-832.
7. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Chen HH et al (1995) Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish two-county trial. Cancer 75: 2507-2517.
8. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG (2003) Clinical practice: mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 348: 1672-1680.
9. Larsson LG, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G, Frisell J, Tabár L, Nyström L (1997) Updated overview of the Swedish randomized trials on breast cancer screening with mammography: age group 40-49 at randomization. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, (22): 57-61.
10. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen H-H, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA (2001) Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91(9): 1724-1731.
11. Feig SA (2002) Effect of service screening mammography on population mortality from breast carcinoma. Cancer 95(Number 3): 451-457.
12. Perry N, Broeders M, Wolf CD, Tornberg S, Holland R, Karsa LV (2008) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition-summary document. Ann Oncol 19: 614-622.
13. Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, Evans P, Monsees B, Monticello et al (2010) Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the society of breast imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 7: 18-27.
14. US Preventive Services Task Force (2009) Screening for breast cancer: U. S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 1519(10): 716-726, W-236.
15. Berlin L, Hall FM (2010) More mammography muddle: emotions, politics. science, costs and polarization. Radiology 255: 311-316.
16. Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992. Mammography facilities requirement for accrediting bodies, and quality standards and certifying requirements: interim rules (21 CFR 900). December 21, 1993; 58: 57558-57572.
17. Carney PA, Sickles EA, Monsees BA, Bassett LA et al (2010) Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology 255(Number 2): 354-361.
18. Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL et al (2003) Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 290: 2129-2137.
19. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Feig SA et al (1998) Breast imaging reporting and data system, 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston.
20. Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Sohlich RE, Dee KE Differential value of comparison with previous examination in diagnostic versus screening mammography.
21. Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW (1999) Does this patient have breast cancer? the screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? JAMA 282: 1270-1280.
22. Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM et al (2002) Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 1445-1457.
23. Elmore JG, Armstrong KA, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW (2005) Screening for breast cancer. JAMA 293(No 10): 1245-1256.
24. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al (2008) Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound vs. mammography alone in women with elevated risk for breast cancer. JAMA 299(18): 2151-2163.
25. Kuhl CK (2008) The "Coming off Age" of non-mammographic screening for breast cancer. JAMA 299(18): 2203-2205.
26. Gordon PG (2002) Ultrasound for breast cancer screening and staging. Radiol Clin N Am 40: 431-441.
27. Tohno E, Ueno E, Watanabe H (2009) Ultrasound screening of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 16: 18-22.
28. Kolb T, Lichy J, Newhouse J Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27, 825 patient evaluations.
29. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W et al (2007) American cancer society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57: 75-89.
30. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351: 427-437.