Research participation as work: Comparing the perspectives of researchers and economically marginalized populations

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 102, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1254-1269

  Davidson, Peter ^a,b   Page, Kimberly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONNEL; POVERTY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; POVERTY; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SUBSTANCE ABUSE, INTRAVENOUS; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 84862848163     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300418     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Bio-medical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1979. Available at: http:// ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmonthtml. Accessed April 25, 2012.
2. Goffman E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press; 1986.
3. Hahn JA, Page-Shafer K, Lum P, Ochoa K, Moss AR. Hepatitis C virus infection and needle exchange use among young injection drug users in San Fran-cisco. Hepatology. 2001;34(1):180-187. (Pubitemid 32591498)
4. Page K, Hahn JA, Evans J, et al. Acute hepatitis C virus infection in young adult injection drug users: a prospective study of incident infection, resolution, and reinfection. J Infect Dis. 2009;200(8): 1216-1226.
5. Kittikraisak W, Davidson PJ, Hahn JA, et al. Incarceration among young injectors in San Francisco: associations with risk for hepatitis C virus infection. J Subst Use. 2006;11(4):271-281. (Pubitemid 44323778)
6. Shafer KP, Hahn JA, Lum PJ, Ochoa K, Graves A, Moss A. Prevalence and correlates of HIV infection among young injection drug users in San Francisco. JAcquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;31(4): 422-431. (Pubitemid 35397096)
7. Macklin R. On paying money to re-search subjects: "due" and "undue" in-ducements. IRB. 1981;3(5):1-6.
8. Dickert N, Grady C. What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(3):198-203. (Pubitemid 29325751)
9. Gordon BG, Brown J, Kratochvil C, Prentice ED. Paying research subjects. In: Amdur RJ, Bankert EA, eds. Institutional Review Board: Management and Function. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Pub-lishers; 2002:185-190.
10. Grady C, Hampson LA, Wallen GR, et al. Exploring the ethics of clinical re-search in an urban community. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(11):1996-2001. (Pubitemid 44655925)
11. Fry C, Dwyer R. For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users participate in research. Addic-tion. 2001;96(9):1319-1325. (Pubitemid 32835709)
12. Mc Keganey N. To pay or not to pay: respondents motivation for participating in research. Addiction. 2001;96(9): 1237-1238. (Pubitemid 32835699)
13. Festinger DS, Marlowe DB, Croft JR, et al. Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation? Drug Alcohol Depend 2005;78(3):275-281. (Pubitemid 40694049)
14. Onion D. Human guinea pigs orga-nize and win. 2007. Available at: http:// www.guineapigzero.com/onionstrike. html. Accessed March 23, 2008.
15. Helms RP. Human guinea pigs "band together." 2007. Available at: http:// www.guineapigzero.com/helmsstrike. html. Accessed March 23, 2008.
16. Jürgens R. "Nothing About Us With-out Us." Greater, Meaningful Involvement of People Who Use Illegal Drugs: A Public Health, Ethical, and Human Rights Imper-ative. Toronto, ON: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network; 2005. Available at: http://www.aidslaw.ca/publications/ publicationsdoc EN.php?ref=85. Accessed October 12, 2009.
17. Bourgois P. The moral economies of homeless heroin addicts: confronting ethnography, HIV risk, and everyday violence in San Francisco shooting encampments. Subst Use Misuse. 1998; 33(11):2323-2351. (Pubitemid 28439702)
18. Human participant protections edu-cation for research teams. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Hu-man Services, National Institutes of Health; 2002. Available at: http://phrp. nihtraining.0000com/users/login.php. Accessed April 19, 2012.
19. Resnik DB. Compensation for re-search-related injuries, ethical and legal issues.J Leg Med. 2006;27(3):263-287. (Pubitemid 44359747)
20. Jansson RL. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher mal-practice actions. Wash Law Rev. 2003; 78(1):229-263. (Pubitemid 36420131)
21. Steinbrook R. Compensation for in-jured research subjects. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(18):1871-1873.
22. Blumenthal DS. A community co-alition board creates a set of values for community-based research. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006;3(1):A16
23. NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Pre-vention Trial Group. Ethical issues in the NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Pre-vention Trial. AIDS. 2007;21(Suppl 2): S69-S80.
24. Mc Carty CA, Chapman-Stone D, Derfus T, et al. Community consultation and communication for a population-based DNA biobank: the Marshñeld clinic personalized medicine research project. Am JMed Genet A. 2008;146A(23): 3026-3033. (Pubitemid 352774642)
25. Vetlesen AJ. Perception, Empathy, and Judgment: An Inquiry Into the Pre-conditions of Moral Performance. Univer-sity Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Univer-sity Press; 1994.