Epigenetic neofunctionalisation and regulatory gene evolution in grasses

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 389-394

  Dickinson, Hugh ^a   Costa, Liliana ^a   Gutierrez Marcos, Jose ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOME IMPRINTING; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MAIZE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLANT GENOME; PLANT SEED; REGULATOR GENE; REVIEW;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, REGULATOR; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; SEEDS; ZEA MAYS;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; POACEAE; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84862845727     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.002     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Blanc K.G., Wolfe K.H. Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell 2004, 16:1679-1691.
2. Lynch M., Force A. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 2000, 154:459-473.
3. Lynch M., Conery J.S. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 2000, 290:1151-1155.
4. Maere S., et al. Modelling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:5454-5459.
5. Force A., et al. The preservation of duplicate genes by subfunctionalization. Am. Zool. 1999, 39:78A.
6. Duarte J.M., et al. Expression pattern shifts following duplication indicative of subfunctionalization and neofuntionalization in regulatory genes of Arabidopsis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:469-478.
7. Bennett M.D. DNA amount, latitude, and crop plant distribution. Env. Exp. Bot. 1976, 16:93-108.
8. Dubcovsky J., Dvorak J. genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 2007, 316:1862-1866.
9. Goff S.A., et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 2002, 296:92-100.
10. Schnable P.S., et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity and dynamics. Science 2009, 326:1112-1115.
11. Paterson A.H., et al. The Sorghum bicolour sequence and the diversification of grasses. Nature 2009, 457:551-556.
12. International Brachypodium Initiative Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature 2010, 463:763-768.
13. Luo M.C., et al. Genome comparisons reveal a dominant mechanism of chromosome number reduction in grasses and accelerated genome evolution in Triticeae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:15780-15785.
14. Woodhouse M.R., et al. Following tetraploidy in maize, a short deletion mechanism removed genes preferentially from one of the two homologs. PloS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000409.
15. Schnable J.C., et al. Dose-sensitivity, conserved non-coding sequences, and duplicate gene retention through multiple tetraploidies in the grasses. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2. 10.3389/fpls.2011.00002.
16. Yang L., Bennetzen J.L. Distribution, diversity, evolution, and survival of helitrons in the maize genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:19922-19927.
17. Meagher R. The Evolution of epitype. Plant Cell 2010, 22:1658-1666.
18. Vanderpoele K.C., et al. Evidence that rice and other cereals are ancient aneuploids. Plant Cell 2003, 15:2192-2202.
19. Yu J., et al. The genomes of Oryza sativa; a history of duplications. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e38.
20. Wang X., et al. Duplication and DNA segmental loss in the rice genome: implications for diploidization. New Phytol. 2005, 165:937-946.
21. Wei F., et al. Physical and genetic structure of the maize genome reflects its complex evolutionary history. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:1254-1263.
22. Salze J., et al. Identification and characterization of shared duplications between rice and wheat provide new insight into grass genome evolution. Plant Cell 2008, 20:11-24.
23. Swigonova Z., et al. Close split of sorghum and maize genome progenitors. Genome Research 2004, 14:1916-1923.
24. Gaut B.S., Doebly J.F. DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allopolyploid origin of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:6809-6814.
25. Wendel J.F., et al. Duplicated chromosomal segments in Zea mays L.: further evidence from hexokinase isozymes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1986, 72:178-185.
26. Ahn S., Tanksley S.D. Comparative linkage maps of the rice and maize genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90:7980-7984.
27. Danilevskya O.N., et al. Duplicated fie genes in maize expression pattern and imprinting suggest distinct functions. Plant Cell 2003, 15:425-438.
28. Chanvivattana Y., et al. Interaction of Polycomb-group proteins controlling flowering in Arabidopsis. Development 2004, 131:5263-5276.
29. Holec S., Berger F. Polycomb group complexes mediate developmental transitions in plants. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:35-43.
30. Mosquna A., et al. Regulation of stem cell maintenance by the Polycomb protein FIE has been conserved during land plant evolution. Development 2009, 136:2433-2444.
31. Ohad N., et al. A mutation that allows endosperm development without fertilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991, 93:5319-5324.
32. Kohler C., et al. Arabidopsis MSI1 is a component of the MEA/FIE Polycomb group complex and required for seed development. EMBO J. 2003, 22:4804-4814.
33. Luo M., et al. Expression, Imprinting and evolution of rice homologs of the Polycomb group genes. Mol. Plant 2009, 2:711-723.
34. Kapazoglou A., et al. Epigenetic chromatin modifiers in barley: IV. The study of barley Polycomb group (PcG) genes during seed development and in response to external ABA. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10:73.
35. Messing J., Bennetzen J. Grass genome structure and evolution. Genome Dyn. 2008, 4:41-56.
36. Salse J., et al. New in silico insight into the synteny between rice (Oryza sativa L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) highlights reshuffling and identifies new duplications in the rice genome. Plant J. 2004, 38:396-409.
37. Springer N.M., et al. Sequence relationships, conserved domains, and expression patterns for Zea mays homologs of the Drosophila Polycomb group genes E(z), esc, and E(Pc). Plant Phys. 2002, 128:1332-1345.
38. Gutierrez-Marcos J.F., et al. Epigenetic asymmetry of imprinted genes in plant gametes. Nature Genetics 2006, 38:876-878.
39. Hermon P., et al. Activation of the imprinted Polycomb Group Fie1 gene in maize endosperm requires demethylation of the maternal allele. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 64:387-395.
40. Haun W.J., et al. Genomic imprinting, methylation and molecular evolution of maize Enhancer of zeste (Mez) homologs. Plant J. 2007, 49:325-337.
41. Gutierrez-Marcos J.F., et al. Maternally expressed gene 1 is a novel maize transfer cell-specific gene with a maternal parent of origin expression. Plant Cell 2004, 16:1288-1301.
42. Stitzel M.L., Seydoux G. Regulation of the oocyte to zygote transition. Science 2007, 316:407-408.
43. Vielle-Calzada J.-P., et al. Delayed activation of the paternal genome during seed development. Nature 2000, 404:91-94.
44. Autran D., et al. Maternal epigenetic pathways control parental contributions to Arabidopsis early embryogenesis. Cell 2011, 145:707-719.
45. Meyer S., Scholten S. Equivalent parental contribution to early plant zygotic development. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1686-1691.
46. Nodine M.D., Bartel D.P. Maternal and paternal genomes contribute equally to the transcriptome of early plant embryos. Nature 2012, 482:94-97.
47. Slotkin R.K., Martienssen R. Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:272-285.
48. Kinoshita T., et al. One-way control of FWA imprinting in Arabidopsis endosperm by DNA methylation. Science 2004, 303:521-523.
49. Kohler C., Weinhofer-Molisch I. Mechanisms and evolution of genomic imprinting in plants. Heredity 2010, 105:57-63.
50. Hsieh T.-F., et al. Genome-wide demethylation of Arabidopsis endosperm. Science 2009, 324:1451-1454.
51. Gehring M., et al. Extensive demethylation of repetitive elements during seed development underlies gene imprinting. Science 2009, 324:1447-1451.
52. Jahnke S., Scholten S. Epigenetic resetting of a gene imprinted in plant embryos. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1677-1681.
53. Haig D., Westoby M. Parent-specific gene expression and the triploid endosperm. Am. Nat. 1989, 134:147-155.
54. Moore T., Haig D. Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet. 1991, 7:45-49.
55. Wolf J.B., Hager R. A maternal-offspring coadaptation theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e380.
56. Weinhofer I., et al. H3K27me3 profiling of the endosperm implies exclusion of polycomb group protein targeting by DNA methylation. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001152.
57. Hsieh T.-F., et al. Regulation of imprinted gene expression in Arabidopsis endosperm. PNAS 2011, 108:1755-1762.
58. Waters A.J., et al. Parent-of-origin effects on gene expression and DNA methylation in the maize endosperm. Plant Cell 2011, 23:4221-4233.
59. Zhang X., et al. Whole genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e129.
60. Costa L.M., et al. Maternal control of nutrient allocation in plant seeds by genomic imprinting. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:1-6.
61. Raissig M.T., et al. Regulation and flexibility of genomic imprinting during seed development. Plant Cell 2011, 23:16-26.
62. Walbot V., Evans M.M. Unique features of the plant life cycle and their consequences. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4:369-379.