Flexible, stretchable and implantable PDMS encapsulated cable for implantable medical device

Biomedical Engineering Letters

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 199-203

  Kim, Sung Hwan ^a   Moon, Jin Hee ^a   Kim, Jeong Hun ^a   Jeong, Sung Min ^a   Lee, Sang Hoon ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Electrical connection; Implantable cable; PDMS

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862840481     PISSN: 20939868     EISSN: 2093985X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13534-011-0033-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Donaldson PE. The Cooper cable: an implantable multiconductor cable for neurological prostheses. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1983; 21(3): 371-374.
2. Marino JC. Flexible connector for implantable wiring harness. In.: US Patent App. 20, 080/009, 198; 2005.
3. Kaplan PM, Cross Jr TE, Bolea SL, Olsen JM. Implantable medical lead with axially oriented coiled wire conductors. In.: Google Patents; 2010.
4. O'brien RC. Implantable electrical lead wire. In.: EP Patent 1, 547, 647; 2005.
5. Kitamura S, Satomi K, Kurita T, Shimizu W, Suyama K, Aihara N, Niwaya K, Kobayashi J, Kamakura S. Long-term follow-up of transvenous defibrillation leads: high incidence of fracture in coaxial polyurethane lead. Circ J. 2006; 70(3): 273-277.
6. Ward B, Anderson J, Ebert M, McVenes R, Stokes K. In vivo biostability of polysiloxane polyether polyurethanes: resistance to metal ion oxidation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006; 77(2): 380-389.
7. Ward R, Anderson J, McVenes R, Stokes K. In vivo biostability of polyether polyurethanes with fluoropolymer and polyethylene oxide surface modifying endgroups; resistance to metal ion oxidation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007; 80(1): 34-44.
8. Szycher M, Reed AM, Siciliano AA. In vivo testing of a biostable polyurethane. J Biomat Appl. 1991; 6(2): 110-130.
9. Ellenbogen KA, Wood MA, Shepard RK, Clemo HF, Vaughn T, Holloman K, Dow M, Leffler J, Abeyratne A, Verness D. Detection and management of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead failure: incidence and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41(1): 73-80.
10. Kleemann T, Becker T, Doenges K, Vater M, Senges J, Schneider S, Saggau W, Weisse U, Seidl K. Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators over a period of >10 years. Circ. 2007; 115(19): 2474-2480.
11. Hauser RG, Cannom D, Hayes DL, Parsonnet V, Hayes J, Ratliff N, 3rd, Tyers GF, Epstein AE, Vlay SC, Furman S et al. Longterm structural failure of coaxial polyurethane implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002; 25(6): 879-882.
12. Luo YL, Nan YF, Xu F, Chen YS, Zhao P. Degradation behavior and biocompatibility of PEG/PANI-derived polyurethane copolymers. J Biomat Sci-Polym E. 2010; 21(8-9): 1143-1172.
13. Stachelek SJ, Alferiev I, Ueda M, Eckels EC, Gleason KT, Levy RJ. Prevention of polyurethane oxidative degradation with phenolic antioxidants covalently attached to the hard segments: structure-function relationships. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010; 94(3): 751-759.
14. Zuidema J, van Minnen B, Span MM, Hissink CE, van Kooten TG, Bos RR. In vitro degradation of a biodegradable polyurethane foam, based on 1, 4-butanediisocyanate: a three-year study at physiological and elevated temperature. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009; 90(3): 920-930.
15. Stachelek SJ, Alferiev I, Choi H, Chan CW, Zubiate B, Sacks M, Composto R, Chen IW, Levy RJ. Prevention of oxidative degradation of polyurethane by covalent attachment of di-tertbutylphenol residues. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006; 78(4): 653-661.
16. van Minnen B, Stegenga B, van Leeuwen MB, van Kooten TG, Bos RR. A long-term in vitro biocompatibility study of a biodegradable polyurethane and its degradation products. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006; 76(2): 377-385.
17. Gorna K, Gogolewski S. Preparation, degradation, and calcification of biodegradable polyurethane foams for bone graft substitutes. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003; 67(3): 813-827.
18. Belanger MC, Marois Y. Hemocompatibility, biocompatibility, inflammatory and in vivo studies of primary reference materials low-density polyethylene and polydimethylsiloxane: a review. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001; 58(5): 467-477.
19. Park J, Yoo S, Lee E-J, Lee D, Kim J, Lee S-H. Increased poly(dimethylsiloxane) stiffness improves viability and morphology of mouse fibroblast cells. BioChip J. 2010; 4(3): 230-236.
20. Peterson SL, McDonald A, Gourley PL, Sasaki DY. Poly(dimethylsiloxane) thin films as biocompatible coatings for microfluidic devices: Cell culture and flow studies with glial cells. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2005; 72A(1): 10-18.